Researchers discover more male than female mammalian fossils in museum collections

fossils
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A team of researchers from the University of Adelaide and the Polish Academy of Sciences has found that there are, on average, many more male mammalian fossil specimens in museums than female. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the group describes their fossil gender study and what they found.

Logic suggests that if you stroll through the catalogs of fossils collected by institutions over the years, you should find them divided roughly in half by —most mammals reproduce genders in equal number, after all. But the researchers with this new effort found that was not the case—there were many more than female fossils.

The researchers report that they began their study when they noticed a gender in the fossil collection at the University of Adelaide. They estimated that 75 percent of there were male. That got them to wondering if that might be the case in other museums, as well. To find out if that might be the case, they accessed databases of fossil information for museums across Europe and North America. They focused specifically on ancient bison and bear specimens. They chose the two because bison are herding animals and bears are not. They thought that the herding behavior of male bison might make them more likely to encounter situations in which their remains would be preserved if they died. This is because each herd has just one male—other males must wander about, trying to establish their own herd, or give up and congregate with other males. The researchers theorized that bear fossils, on the other hand, should have their remains more evenly distributed, because both genders are loners, except for when the females are caring for their young. The researchers report that they found the same gender bias in both species. They suggest the bias in the bears may be due to males wandering farther than females, or because they are more likely to win competitions for caves.

The researchers note that they also looked at some other in the database and found the same gender bias for most of those they studied—one exception was bats. For some reason, researchers have unearthed more female bat fossils than male. The researchers cannot explain the in the collections, but suggest the differences should be noted when scientists are studying them.


Explore further

Study suggests use of gender-neutral terms to describe people leads to gender equality

More information: Graham Gower el al., Widespread male sex bias in mammal fossil and museum collections, PNAS (2019). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1903275116

© 2019 Science X Network

Citation: Researchers discover more male than female mammalian fossils in museum collections (2019, September 3) retrieved 15 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-09-male-female-mammalian-fossils-museum.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
375 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 04, 2019
Maybe they should look at age too. Maybe there's the cause: males may die younger because of infighting and competition, while females may live longer and their bones don't preserve too well.

Sep 04, 2019
And why would they not preserve as well?

Sep 05, 2019
Because their bones may become frail with old age.

Sep 05, 2019
Because their bones may become frail with old age.

Sounds like females had a better survival strategy... :-)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more