Study suggests economic growth benefits wildlife but growing human populations do not

Study suggests economic growth benefits wildlife but growing human populations do not
Wildebeest on the Serengeti. Credit: ZSL

In a world first, researchers at ZSL and UCL compared changes in bird and mammal populations with socio-economic trends in low- and lower-middle income countries over the past 20 years. Their results suggest that national-level economic growth and more gender-balanced governments enhance wildlife populations and provide support for linking the UN's human development and conservation targets.

In 2015, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was formally adopted by all United Nations Member States to provide "a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future." At its core are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which call for world-wide collaboration to reduce inequality, improve and education, promote economic growth, tackle climate change and conserve biodiversity.

This blend of demographic and environmental development is complex, and the SDGs are not the only agenda the international community is working to. Evidence of continuing biodiversity loss has led to a succession of conservation-focussed policies too, chief of which are the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Aichi targets, set for 2020. With potentially competing priorities, the team at ZSL's Institute of Zoology and UCL's Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, wanted to understand whether progress towards socio-economic targets might limit the likelihood of meeting conservation ones.

To explore these links, researchers cross-referenced data from the Living Planet Index on 298 bird and mammal populations—recorded outside protected reserves—with indicators of social, economic and political progress towards the SDGs in 33 low- and lower-middle income countries obtained from the World Bank. Their analysis, published today in the journal People and Nature, found consistently between and wildlife abundance—so the richer the people, the safer the biodiversity. Similar relationships were found for more gender-equal societies, lower levels of government corruption and longer human lifespans too.

Lead author Judith Ament, Ph.D. researcher at ZSL and UCL, said: "Our study suggests that at a national level, it is possible to work towards conservation and economic development at the same time and underlines the need for further integration of strategies. We think this might be because as standards of living rise, people become less dependent on local natural resources for income and food, and environmental regulation becomes tighter. We are concerned that this could lead to more importing however, the impact of which would fall on wildlife elsewhere. This certainly merits further research."

Researchers also found that denser and faster-growing human populations reduced wildlife numbers and that there is evidence for national-level environmental benefits of urbanisation.

Dr. Chris Carbone, Senior Research Fellow in ZSL's Institute of Zoology, said: "This is consistent with other studies that have shown how humans compete with animals for space and resources and if more people are concentrated in one place, more areas are open to wildlife. It wasn't all good news though and we did find that aspects of had a negative impact on some species. Numbers of water-birds, for example, fell as wider water sanitation and treatment processes were implemented. It's only by understanding these relationships that we can mitigate them and put forward policies that are good for people and for the natural world. This paper provides the first empirical evidence that simultaneous progress for both international development and conservation is possible and, should further research uphold our findings, could revolutionise UN target setting in the future."

ZSL's research was essential to establishing major global monitoring and prioritisation programmes, such as the IUCN Red List and Living Planet Index, as well as setting and evaluating the UN's biodiversity targets. The next CBD targets, to replace the Aichi targets, will be set at the convention in Beijing, October 2020, where ZSL data on global biodiversity trends will again be key.


Explore further

Nations need to get serious about biodiversity loss or risk missing global targets

More information: Judith M. Ament et al, Compatibility between agendas for improving human development and wildlife conservation outside protected areas: Insights from 20 years of data, People and Nature (2019). DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10041
Citation: Study suggests economic growth benefits wildlife but growing human populations do not (2019, August 2) retrieved 16 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-08-economic-growth-benefits-wildlife-human.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
33 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

"This paper provides the first empirical evidence that simultaneous progress for both international development and conservation is possible and, should further research uphold our findings, could revolutionise UN target setting in the future."

The more important conclusion is that today's population growth and an intact nature contradict each other. The UN needs to urgently add the intentionally and recklessly left out target of overpopulation reduction.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more