Consumers want food labelling details spoon-fed

Consumers want food labelling details spoon-fed
Food manufacturers are looking at quick response codes, or QR codes, that allow shoppers to scan a label and access information on a bioengineered product. But a University of Delaware survey found consumers are not likely to scan the codes with their own phone, which could impact strategies for industry leaders. Credit: Monica Moriak/ University of Delaware

In 2016, Congress passed a federal mandate requiring manufacturers to label bioengineered foods. Since then, industry leaders have been searching for quick and easily accessible methods for sharing information about how and why a product was bioengineered, and the impact that might have on the consumer or the environment.

One way to reach is through quick response codes, or QR codes, that allow shoppers to scan a label to access information about the production, development or manufacturing process.

It remains to be seen if or how often consumers will access or use this additional information to find out more about genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Kent Messer, a professor of applied economics at the University of Delaware, recently conducted a study of QR codes on food packaging to determine how much additional effort consumers are willing to undertake in the search for product information. The research was recently published in the Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

Messer's team visited the Cape May-Lewes Ferry terminal in Lewes, Delaware. There, they recruited 417 research participants from the crowd of vacationers awaiting the next ferry.

Each person was asked to make a purchase decision based on information provided about triploid oysters. Triploid oysters have been engineered to contain an extra set of chromosomes and thus grow larger. At the completion of the study, participants were able to purchase oysters on site.

The team studied whether consumers are willing to make small efforts to read information that is not presented directly on the label and whether different labeling technologies produce different responses.

Participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups that each received varying information on triploid oysters: no additional information, printed information, a clickable link, and a QR code with or without a scanning device.

Results showed that 20% of consumers accessed additional information about the oysters when offered a clickable web link. When offered a QR code, only 1% accessed the information. However, this number jumped to over 50% when a QR scanning device was provided instead of consumers having to use their own mobile device.

This information could prove invaluable as the prepares to start implementing the bioengineered labeling standard.

"The mandatory labeling standard goes into effect in January 2020 for all major companies," said Messer, who is also director of UD's Center for Experimental and Applied Economics. "Small companies are exempted for a year, but by 2021 all companies are required to label bioengineered foods. From an industry perspective, companies need to know what their consumers want. They're looking for ways in which they can get information to people beyond a simple note on the label and this study provides evidence on how best to do that."

Knowing that consumers might only access information when it's convenient and when a device is available could have implications for grocers, as well. For instance, stores may want to provide free QR devices. Shoppers could scan their item and immediately read detailed information about its ingredients or production, much like the price check machines that already exist at many retailers.

"Consumers want to know what is in their food and this could be one way to offer them more information," Messer said. "But this study suggests that, despite consumer interest and demand for the new federal law, when consumers are offered via QR codes, many of them may not access it on a regular basis, if at all."

Explore further

Researchers explore consumer response to the use of recycled water in wine production

Citation: Consumers want food labelling details spoon-fed (2019, June 5) retrieved 15 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 05, 2019
"when consumers are offered information via QR codes, many of them may not access it on a regular basis, if at all."
Most people do not take pleasure in hanging out at the supermarket, myself included.
I want to get in, get what I came for and get out. I like to read food labels, if printed large enough I can see them.
As a child I could read the service dates inscribed in the back of a watch case but that is no longer possible.
I, really, do not want to bother, with QR codes, for all the food items in my basket.
That is too much time, in the market. I want to move on.
Also, many people, still, do not have smart phones. The population is large and that small percentage, without smart phones, is a very large number, of people. They are, mostly, the older crowd, who can't use a smart phone or feel no need, to pay $300 or more, for a phone.

Jun 05, 2019
I have a smart phone and do, on occasion, use QR codes. It is helpful when buying garden chemicals (and I can't read the label) or when shopping for tech items, which, often, do no show the specs, I am interested in, on the packaging.
Beyond all that, what's the big deal, about bio-engineered foods?
All livestock, grains, vegetables and fruits have been bred and cultivated, through the centuries, to give us what we have today. Nowadays, we can do the same thing faster, in the laboratory. There is no difference, except time. Moot point.

Jun 05, 2019
I'm sorry, I have one more point.
I take issue, with the author, of this article, using the title:
"Consumers want food labelling details spoon-fed"
This is not something even alluded to, in the reports.
I think this person needs an attitude adjustment.
There, absolutely, is nothing wrong with people wanting to know, what they are putting in their mouths.
The person makes it sound, as though, they are working for the, anti-labeling producers.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more