Subaru telescope helps determine that dark matter is not made up of tiny primordial black holes

Subaru telescope helps determine that dark matter is not made up of tiny primordial black holes
Figure 1: The Milky Way galaxy (left) and the Andromeda galaxy (right) are separated by 2.6 million light years. Compared with the areas where stars are clustered together, dark matter is believed to be distributed over a much larger volume. Credit: Kavli IPMU

An international team of researchers has put a theory speculated by the late Stephen Hawking to its most rigorous test to date, and their results based on the observations using the Subaru Telescope have ruled out the possibility that primordial black holes smaller than a tenth of a millimeter make up most of dark matter.

Scientists know that 27 per cent of the matter in the Universe is made up of dark matter. Its prevents stars in our Milky Way from flying apart. However, attempts to detect such dark matter particles using underground experiments, or accelerator experiments including the world's largest accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider, have failed so far.

This has led scientists to consider Hawking's 1974 theory of the existence of primordial black holes, born shortly after the Big Bang, and his speculation that they could make up a large fraction of the elusive dark matter scientists are trying to discover today.

An international team of researchers, led by Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe Principal Investigator Masahiro Takada, PhD candidate student Hiroko Niikura, Professor Naoki Yasuda, and including researchers from Japan, India and the US, have used the effect to look for primordial black holes between Earth and the Andromeda galaxy. Gravitational lensing, an effect first suggested by Albert Einstein, manifests itself as the bending of light rays coming from a distant object such as a star due to the gravitational effect of an intervening massive object such as a primordial black hole. In extreme cases, such light bending causes the background star to appear much brighter than it originally is.

Subaru telescope helps determine that dark matter is not made up of tiny primordial black holes
Figure 2: As the Subaru Telescope on Earth looks at the Andromeda galaxy, a star in Andromeda will become significantly brighter if a primordial black hole passes in front of the star. As the primordial black hole continues to move out of alignment, the star will also turn dimmer (go back to its original brightness). Credit: Kavli IPMU

However, gravitational lensing effects are very rare events because it requires a star in the Andromeda galaxy, a primordial black hole acting as the gravitational lens, and an observer on Earth to be exactly in line with one another. So to maximize the chances of capturing an event, the researchers used the Hyper Suprime-Cam on the Subaru Telescope, which can capture the whole image of the Andromeda galaxy in one shot. Taking into account how fast primordial black holes are expected to move in , the team took multiple images to be able to catch the flicker of a star as it brightens for a period of a few minutes to hours due to gravitational lensing.

Subaru telescope helps determine that dark matter is not made up of tiny primordial black holes
Figure 3: Data from the star which showed characteristics of being magnified by a potential gravitational lens, possibly by a primordial black hole. About 4 hours after data taking on the Subaru Telescope began, one star began to shine brighter. Less than an hour later, the star reached peak brightness before becoming dimmer. Credit: Niikura et al.

From 190 consecutive images of the Andromeda galaxy taken over seven hours during one clear night, the team scoured the data for potential gravitational lensing events. If dark matter consists of primordial black holes of a given mass, in this case masses lighter than the moon, the researchers expected to find about 1000 events. But after careful analyses, they could only identify one case. The team's results showed primordial black holes can contribute no more than 0.1 per cent of all mass. Therefore, it is unlikely the theory is true./p>

The researchers are now planning to further develop their analysis of the Andromeda galaxy. One new theory they will investigate is to find whether binary black holes discovered by gravitational wave detector LIGO are in fact .

Subaru telescope helps determine that dark matter is not made up of tiny primordial black holes
Figure 4: Constraints on the mass fraction of primordial black holes to dark matter in the Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy as a function of primordial black hole mass. Shaded regions show excluded regions where existence of such primordial black holes are not consistent with various observation data. The red color indicates the area where this study has contributed to the study of primordial black holes. One-night HSC/Subaru gives the most stringent constraints for primordial black holes with masses lighter than moon mass, e.g. compared to the NASA Kepler 2-year data. Credit: Niikura et al.

These results were published on April 1, 2019 in Nature Astronomy.


Explore further

Is dark matter made of primordial black holes?

More information: Hiroko Niikura et al. Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astronomy (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0723-1
Journal information: Nature Astronomy

Provided by Subaru Telescope
Citation: Subaru telescope helps determine that dark matter is not made up of tiny primordial black holes (2019, April 2) retrieved 19 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-04-subaru-telescope-dark-tiny-primordial.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
621 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 02, 2019
Dark matter is a supersolid that fills 'empty' space, strongly interacts with ordinary matter and is displaced by ordinary matter. What is referred to geometrically as curved spacetime physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the supersolid dark matter. The state of displacement of the supersolid dark matter is gravity.

The supersolid dark matter displaced by a galaxy pushes back, causing the stars in the outer arms of the galaxy to orbit the galactic center at the rate in which they do.

Displaced supersolid dark matter is curved spacetime.

In the Bullet Cluster collision the dark matter has not separated from the ordinary matter. The collision is analogous to two boats that collide, the boats slow down and their bow waves continue to propagate. The water has not separated from the boats, the bow waves have. In the Bullet Cluster collision the galaxy's dark matter displacement waves have separated from the colliding galaxies, causing the light to lense.

Apr 02, 2019
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Apr 02, 2019
Scientists know that 85 per cent of the matter in the Universe is made up of dark matter.


No they don't. Repeating such unverified material only makes reporting less believable. It is fake news. What scientists know is that the motion of stars does not match up with current gravitational theories. Dark matter is simply one proposal of many that tries to fill this void, but nothing has even been proven either way.

Apr 03, 2019
Bayesian approach is based on how much you are 'surprised' - this is a technical term, by the way - that your hypothesis is of lower likelihood than a chance.
Here, everyone throws all kind of stuff at the wall in hope it will stick. 'Surprise' is nothing sticks. Perhaps, it would be wiser to leave nonsense behind? And publish the finding, like Higgs bozon, for example, when a definite discovery is made.
And not keep making fools of themselves with - we tried this silly old idea again, and 'surprise', still no dark matter!

Apr 03, 2019
Yeah, I didn't think so after the MACHO search.

Apr 03, 2019
Yeah, I didn't think so after the MACHO search.


Me neither. Though I think MACHOs would have problems with the cosmic background spectra which Hawking's primordials did not. So nice to see virtually total elimination (since I see that there is a relatively small - measured as magnitudes - mass range left).

Off topic, but the troll block is super efficient! There was just one sensible (and worthwhile) comment on this thread.

Apr 03, 2019
I never did understand the hypothesized idea that there were a myriad of tiny, primordial black holes drifting around, every which way.

It would seem to me, that after 13+billion years those would have been sucking in photons & gases & dust in sufficient quantities to become noticeable as they accumulated Mass?

& wouldn't those midget BH have been attracted to the larger, supermassive BH/SOs?
Even if still outside the Big Boy's Event Horizon perimeter, wouldn't there have been detectable concentrations? With sufficient Mass to disrupt nearby gas clods & stellar clusters?

Apr 05, 2019
Epicycles are not caused by unicorns either.

Apr 05, 2019
gug? i coulda sworn i observed those circus unicorns riding epic-cycles!

Apr 08, 2019
As a layman, I've been fascinated by all of the articles on the dark matter and dark energy problems. I have proposed my own gravity-modification hypothesis to explain these effects. This hypothesis also explains the odd acceleration of Oumuamua, the interstellar asteroid that recently passed through our solar system. I paste a link to this article here:

https://redd.it/ao8vfo

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more