New model explains origins of empathy

empathy
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Researchers at the Max Planck Institute and the Santa Fe Institute have developed a new model to explain the evolutionary origins of empathy and other related phenomena, such as emotional contagion and contagious yawning. The model suggests that the origin of a broad range of empathetic responses lies in cognitive simulation. It shifts the theoretical focus from a top-down approach that begins with cooperation to one that begins with a single cognitive mechanism.

According to Fabrizio Mafessoni, who is a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, standard theoretical models of the origins of empathy tend to focus on scenarios in which coordination or are favored.

Mafessoni, and his co-author Michael Lachmann, a theoretical biologist and Professor at the Santa Fe Institute, explored the possibility that the underlying a broad range of empathetic responses—including emotional contagion, contagious yawning, and pathologies like echopraxia (compulsive repetition of others' movements) and echolalia (compulsive repetition of others' speech)—could evolve in the absence of kin selection or any other mechanism directly favoring cooperation or coordination.

Mafessoni and Lachmann posited that animals, including humans, can engage in the act of simulating the minds of others. We cannot read other minds—they are like black boxes to us. But, as Lachmann explains, all agents share almost identical "black boxes" with members of their species, and "they are constantly running simulations of what other minds might be doing." This ongoing as-actor is not necessarily geared toward cooperation: it's just something humans and animals do spontaneously.

An example of this process is represented by : it has been known for some time that the same neurons engaged in planning a hand movement are also used when observing the hand movement of others. Mafessoni and Lachmann wondered what the consequences would be if they were to extend that process of understanding to any .

When they modeled outcomes rooted in cognitive simulation, they found that actors engaged in as-actor simulation produce a variety of systems typically explained in terms of cooperation or kin-selection. They also found that an observer can occasionally coordinate with an actor even when this outcome is not advantageous. Their model suggests that empathetic systems do not evolve solely because agents are disposed to cooperation and kin-selection. They also evolve because animals simulate others to envision their actions. According to Mafessoni, "the very origin of empathy may lie in the need to understand other individuals."

For Lachmann, their findings "completely change how we think about humans and animals." Their is grounded in a single, cognitive mechanism that unifies a broad set of phenomena under one explanation. It therefore has theoretical import for a wide range of fields, including cognitive psychology, anthropology, neuroscience, complex systems, and evolutionary biology. Its power stems from both its unifying clarity and its theoretical interest in the limits of cooperation as an explanatory frame.

The study is published in Scientific Reports.


Explore further

Scientists develop new theoretical model on the evolution of cooperation

More information: Scientific Reports, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41835-5
Journal information: Scientific Reports

Provided by Santa Fe Institute
Citation: New model explains origins of empathy (2019, April 8) retrieved 18 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-04-empathy.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
196 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 08, 2019
Sigh. Social species *have* to cooperate. It is the essence of the social lifestyle. So any adaptation that is not geared toward cooperation is unlikely to offer an evolutionary advantage relative to an adaptation that does.

"the very origin of empathy may lie in the need to understand other individuals."

This is completely unoriginal. Social animals only need to understand other animals because we live in groups. Frans de Waal has been saying this for decades. This ability is not incidental.

And it goes hand in hand with reciprocity (Frans de Waal again). We not only model what they might do, we keep track of what they actually do and use that to constantly refine our model.

Not only do we model other individuals and our relationship with them, we keep track of all the social relationships in our group. Which Robin Dunbar proposed decades ago.


Apr 09, 2019
Social species *have* to cooperate.


No, but they have evolved to do so. In any case the majority of genes are under selfish selection rather than kinship selection (in UK humans, currently selection against hearth disease the strongest, IIRC). The paper suggest more such as the likely null hypothesis.

It is believed all animals model "self" as mice and rats do, and model as much of the enviornment as possible is advantageous whether or not social species or not, A possible difference is that it can be more advantageous when you meet more of the same population, as often in social species. But that has nothing to do with kinship selection, rather argues against.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more