CERN lab on the hunt for dark matter

CERN
Aerial View of the CERN. Credit: CERN

Europe's physics lab CERN on Tuesday said it was planning a new experiment to look for particles associated with dark matter which is believed to make up some 27 percent of the universe.

The European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN), which is home to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)—a giant lab in a 27-kilometre (17-mile) tunnel straddling the French-Swiss border—said the new experiment was "designed to look for light and weakly interacting particles".

Scientists say that so-called —which includes stars, gases, dust, planets and everything on them—accounts for only five percent of the universe.

But and dark energy account for the rest, and scientists have yet to directly observe either.

Invisible to telescopes, dark matter is a mysterious substance which is perceived through its on other objects in the cosmos.

"Some of these sought-after particles are associated with dark matter," a statement from CERN said.

Back in 2010, the LHC began smashing high-energy protons into each other at velocities near the speed of light. These collisions generate new particles, giving physicists an unprecedented look at the laws of nature in the hope of better understanding the universe.

But the LHC's four main detectors are not suited for picking up evidence of such light and weakly interacting particles associated with dark matter.

"They may travel hundreds of metres without interacting with any material before transforming into known and detectable particles, such as electrons and positrons. The exotic particles would escape the existing detectors along the current beam lines and remain undetected."

To address the problem, CERN has developed a new instrument known as FASER, which can perform highly-sensitive searches and is able to spot such particles.

"Although the protons in the particle beams will be bent by magnets around the LHC, the light, very weakly interacting particles will continue along a and their 'decay products' can be spotted by FASER," it said.

The aim is to search for hypothesised particles including so-called dark photons and neutralinos, which are also associated with dark matter, with the experiment expected to start running between 2021 and 2023.

In 2012, the LHC was used to prove the existence of the Higgs Boson—dubbed the God particle—which allowed scientists to make great progress in understanding how acquire mass.


Explore further

CERN approves hunt for new cosmic particles at the Large Hadron Collider

© 2019 AFP

Citation: CERN lab on the hunt for dark matter (2019, March 5) retrieved 21 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-03-cern-lab-dark.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1598 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 05, 2019
LOL What a waste of energy. Dark Matter/Dark Energy don't exist, even in the form of spooky Quantum Particles. Matter and Energy are interchangeable as each form transforms into the other and back again. Energies are also a form of Matter, so it is in Energy that Matter resides and is hidden from detection - which is why Gravity can affect normal Matter, as well as normal Energy. Without normal Mass, there are NO Gravitational effects.
The Universe has only a finite volume of both Matter and Energy. That 5% Matter that they claim to exist is all there is. If it isn't detectable, then it doesn't exist. Thus, DM/DE are figments of human imagination so that their math calculations that tell them that THERE HAS TO BE something more than ordinary Mater/Energy, and that "something" is in hiding, therefore it MUST BE a new as yet undiscovered Particle or Wave.
So they perform all kinds of math and mental exercises to find a new Particle when the answer was always there in plain sight.

Mar 05, 2019
> Egg, the whole thing is a move of desperation because all the other exotic tests with vats filled with exotic fluids & gases have failed to produce anything. The LHC is a collider, not a collection vessel.

Mar 05, 2019
"Scientists say that so-called ordinary matter—which includes stars, gases, dust, planets and everything on them—accounts for only five percent of the universe.
But dark matter and dark energy account for the rest, and scientists have yet to directly observe either."

Magical unicorns at work.
====

"The aim is to search for hypothesised particles including so-called dark photons and neutralinos, which are also associated with dark matter, with the experiment expected to start running between 2021 and 2023."

There are certain Laws of God and Nature that should never be tampered with - whether thought as justified or not. The Universe is what it is and was created for Life to exist. To steadily tamper with the Universe could result in dire consequences - even if it is for the sake of discovery and science. Proceed at your own risk.


Mar 05, 2019
> Egg, the whole thing is a move of desperation because all the other exotic tests with vats filled with exotic fluids & gases have failed to produce anything. The LHC is a collider, not a collection vessel.
says Benni

For all their training and knowledge, they still don't understand what it is they're doing - no matter how sophisticated and powerful their instruments are. Their collider can break apart Particles into smaller and smaller ones. When they get to the smallest possible Particles that are far below the Atomic level - they could force a 'chain reaction' that just might cause the known Universe to blink out of existence. I am not joking, Benni. These folks in Europe are unaware of what they could cause to happen. The Universe is a delicate thing that will not bounce back. I fear for humanity and all Life Forms everywhere in the Cosmos.

Mar 05, 2019
Hey look otto has found it

"GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF HYDRINO GAS PRODUCED BY THE SUNCELL®
Hydrino gas was observed to have a faster migration time and a higher thermal conductivity than any known gas as shown by a negative gas chromatographic peak before hydrogen in a helium carrier gas [link]. This data adds to the massive portfolio of other analytical tests that confirm the existence of hydrino [link], a smaller more stable form of hydrogen formed by the release of massive power. Brilliant Light Power is developing the proprietary SunCell® to harness this green power source to replace all other forms of power."

-right there in front of your faces-

Mar 05, 2019
In search of black holes and dark matter astrophysicists are relying on indirect observations. It would seem that the measurement of the event horizon of a black hole directly would be a direct evidence. However, by the nature of a horizon, any real measurement of the event horizon will be indirect. The Event Horizon Telescope will get picture of the silhouette of the Sgr A* which is due to optical effects of spacetime outside of the event horizon. The result will be determined by the simple quality of the resulting image that does not depend on the properties of the spacetime within the image. So, it will be also indirect and an existence of BH is a hypothesis.
https://www.acade...ilky_Way
https://www.acade...k_Energy

Mar 06, 2019
CERN. Desperately trying to find something to justify its existence since all discoveries stalled after the Higgs tentative identification.

Mar 06, 2019
It would seem that the measurement of the event horizon of a black hole directly would be a direct evidence.

The event horizon is a mathematical boundary. Not a real object.

Besides: There is no way to measure it directly because measurement relies on something to measure it WITH (e.g. some sort of measuring device or - at it's simplest - a photon). Since any device (or photon) that impacts the event horizon is lost to the outside universe you can't get any kind of information back from it.

Mar 06, 2019
Desperately trying to find something to justify its existence since all discoveries stalled after the Higgs tentative identification.

There's still petabytes of uneprocessed data from all the runs. Just because research results from CERN don't make the popular press like with the Higgs doesn't mean there isn't any kind of results coming out of the LHC.

There's been several hundred papers coming from that source in the last year alone
https://lpcc.web....ications
The LHC has definitely no problem "justifying its existence"

Mar 06, 2019
Hey look otto has found it

"GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF HYDRINO GAS PRODUCED BY THE SUNCELL®
Hydrino gas was observed to have a faster migration time and a higher thermal conductivity than any known gas as shown by a negative gas chromatographic peak before hydrogen in a helium carrier gas [link]. This data adds to the massive portfolio of other analytical tests that confirm the existence of hydrino [link], a smaller more stable form of hydrogen formed by the release of massive power. Brilliant Light Power is developing the proprietary SunCell® to harness this green power source to replace all other forms of power."

-right there in front of your faces-


Nonsense. Mills is a con artist who has been promising this product for decades. Hydrinos do not exist. They cannot exist.

Mar 06, 2019
We've looked for heavy dark matter particles. Nothing doing.

Time to look for light ones.

Mar 06, 2019
The Event Horizon Telescope will get picture of the silhouette of the Sgr A* which is due to optical effects of spacetime outside of the event horizon.
Thanks Val. I'd surmise based on my discussions at https://phys.org/...ure.html that the diameter of the silhouette scales with the total matter of the galaxy - dark and normal - for galaxies being held together by supermassive black holes. Presuming of course the diameter of the silhouette scales with the diameter of the ring singularity. Unfortunately this idea can't be tested with only one galaxy. Maybe someday...

Mar 06, 2019
that the diameter of the silhouette scales with the total matter of the galaxy

No it does not. It scales with the mass of the black hole.

Presuming of course the diameter of the silhouette scales with the diameter of the ring singularity

The idea of a "diameter" of anything inside a black hole's event horizon makes no sense. A diameter must be measurable by some type of 'yardstick'. In the most universal case this is the flight time between point A and B of a photon times the speed of light. No such (unambiguous) geodesics exist between points on a ring singularity (or for that matter between any two points within the event horizon)

Mar 06, 2019
Nonsense. Mills is a con artist who has been promising this product for decades. Hydrinos do not exist. They cannot exist
Perhaps. But your opinion was formed a decade or 2 ago, based on old info. So its worthless.

Dark energy wasnt discovered until 1998, yes?

Mar 06, 2019
Nonsense. Mills is a con artist who has been promising this product for decades. Hydrinos do not exist. They cannot exist
Perhaps. But your opinion was formed a decade or 2 ago, based on old info. So its worthless.

Dark energy wasnt discovered until 1998, yes?


I'm not talking about dark matter, I'm talking about Mills ludicrous claims that a hydrogen atom has states below the ground state. As Nobel physics laureate, Phillip Anderson, said;

If you could f*** around with the hydrogen atom, you could f*** around with the energy process in the sun. You could f*** around with life itself. Everything we know about everything would be a bunch of nonsense. That's why I'm so sure that it's a fraud.


https://rationalw...ll_Mills

Mar 06, 2019
I'm not talking about dark matter
-But mills claims his hydrino IS dark matter. See what you dont know?
I'm talking about Mills ludicrous claims that a hydrogen atom has states below the ground state. As Nobel physics laureate, Phillip Anderson, said "blah"
-and he said this -what- 20yrs ago? Nobel laureates say lots of uninformed things...

"Those are some impressive accomplishments, but according to Shockley, they weren't as important as the work he would carry out later in his career safeguarding the genetic future of the human race. Shockley proposed the idea that people with low IQs should be paid to undergo voluntary sterilization. Most of these people, he insisted, were African Americans."
https://www.realc...ers.html

-Im saying that mills has impressive rebuttals to those old arguments, as well as much impressive experimental data accrued since. You've got to debunk THAT.

Mar 06, 2019
Nothing about the ground state that is absolute. Very little about science that is absolute, as it should be.

As long as mills is creating his inexplicable fireworks
https://brilliant...a-video/

-then science ought to keep an open mind.

Mar 06, 2019


-Im saying that mills has impressive rebuttals to those old arguments, as well as much impressive experimental data accrued since. You've got to debunk THAT.


No, he hasn't. He is not even a physicist. And Anderson is far from the only scientist to trash his nonsense. There is no such thing as a hydrino. Never been seen. Never will be seen. He's either a con artist, or extremely incompetent.

Mar 06, 2019
Nothing about the ground state that is absolute. Very little about science that is absolute, as it should be.

As long as mills is creating his inexplicable fireworks
https://brilliant...a-video/

-then science ought to keep an open mind.


Lol. Mills' videos! Burning up electrodes may impress the gullible, but there is no independent backing for his crazy claims. As Anderson said, a state below the ground state would leave the universe looking very different. I tend to trust the physicists who have looked at this woo, rather than the unqualified crank making the claims for 3 decades................." nearly there, just a little more funding"!
Anybody that has invested in this nonsense might as well have set fire to their money. At least it would keep them warm. Mills will never produce anything that will do the same.

Mar 06, 2019
Nothing is coming out of Stygian Oubliette DBA as a Black Hole.

Nothing but Gravitational Attractant that we can see as Gravity Waves through the surrounding Accretion Disks & close-orbiting gas clouds.

Across the Event Horizon all Matter & Energy is disintegrates to it's Planck Foundational Gravitrons. You would think that in our Stochastic Universe some photons would randomly escape or be repelled? Creating a glow?
But so far, no one has seen that. So much for Random Probabilities...
& Free Will can go whistle up a tree.

I'm suspecting that at the Event Horizon, the nice & neatly packaged rules & regulations we expect & demand!
Such as Newtonian Physics & the Laws of Thermodynamics, simply do not apply?_exist?_continue?

Whatever is going on in there?
Is truly exotic phenomena that simply boggles our primitive monkey brains.

& we damn well aren't going to stand for that sort of insult from Reality.
Onward I say!
Onward to Quantum Gravity Theory!

Mar 06, 2019
@Castrogiovanni
And Anderson is far from the only scientist to trash his nonsense. There is no such thing as a hydrino. Never been seen. Never will be seen. He's either a con artist, or extremely incompetent
I wouldn't bother - this is one of the cons that many have fallen for, regardless of how many times you post evidence or refute, you'll simply get back more links to mills claims or his site

I've been making the exact same arguments against mills for years, with links and references, and it's come to nought

IMHO: let those who support mills and the mythological hydrino, which has never once been spotted, proven or validated, invest their life savings


Mar 06, 2019
IMHO: let those who support mills and the mythological hydrino, which has never once been spotted, proven or validated, invest their life savings


Quite so. He has reported validations, but they don't stand up to scrutiny. As per this, for example;

http://goodmath.s...no-saga/

That report mentions Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan;

https://www.linke...-3188517

Well, he certainly works for EnerSys (formerly Enser Corp.). Let's have a look further down the page..................................................

Staff Scientist
BlacklightPower
June 2000 – January 2002 1 year 8 months
Cranbury, NJ


Who'd have thunk it? It's a scam.

Mar 06, 2019
There has been a lot of speculation of just how bizarre reality gets inside an Event Horizon.
Such as wormholes, time_traveling,
entry to other universes_multiverses, traversing Dimensions,
punching holes in the so-called "fabric" of Space_Time,
are just a few.

But what have we actually observe? That there is a phenomena we are temporarily calling Black Holes because of clumsy wordsmithing.
Eventually you will adopt my term of Stygian Oubliette. As it is a much more accurate a description of the phenomena.
& makes me laugh every time I type it!
..
As only the influence of Gravity comes back out past the Event Horizon? There is nothing inside but Gravity as a Constant of the accumulated Mass of Gravitrons that never diminish.

& there it all stays. Which means, that it does not rip holes in Space_Time to escape into other dimensions & universes.
No wormholes.
Time is forward.
Gravity is inward.
Everything else such as E/M & plasma. are irrelevant noise.

Mar 06, 2019
@Castro, seems like deniers are scam bait. There's also Rossi and his cold fusion scam.

Mar 06, 2019
Lol. Mills' videos! Burning up electrodes may impress the gullible
Uh that was rossi.
I've been making the exact same arguments against mills for years, with links and references, and it's come to nought
Yah stump, by repeating the same old 20yr arguments. Castro seems to prefer more recent logic like this:

"Who is the ENSER corporation? They're an engineering consulting/staffing firm that's located in the same town as Blacklight's offices. So, pretty much, what we're seeing is that Mills hired his next door neighbor"

-Same town... well they must be colluding then.

Sorry that shit dont flush. You should be embarrassed to present it.

The central question remains... is there a state below the accepted ground state? There is NO PROOF, only opinions. Meanwhile mills continues to burn through steel cubes with abandon.

Mar 06, 2019
It's not "the accepted ground state."

We know this because we know the shapes and classification of the 3D waves that make up the orbitals. Unless you've got negative energy you can't go below zero. And the ground state is zero.

Mar 06, 2019


-Same town... well they must be colluding then.

The central question remains... is there a state below the accepted ground state? There is NO PROOF, only opinions. Meanwhile mills continues to burn through steel cubes with abandon.


And one of the Enersys validators just happened to be a former BLP employee? Scam.
Video's that show nothing. Claiming detections with equipment that could not detect such things/ Scam.
And no, there is no state below ground. It is called ground state for a reason. Hydrogen has had ~ 14 billion years to find its ground state. And the only person who says it has a below ground state? An unqualified crank.

Mar 06, 2019
@otto
Yah stump, by repeating the same old 20yr arguments
you should know better than to post absolute falsehoods, otto
our discussion of 2014 resulted in links to:
The European Physical Journal D, Volume 66, Issue 5, 2012
and
The European Physical Journal D, Volume 66, Issue 1, 2012
and
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Volume 6, Issue 6, 1 June 2011
even "Hydrinos: Impressive Free Energy Crackpottery" was from 2011 (8yrs ago today, but only 3 yrs old when we discussed it earlier)

even taking the date today the links aren't 20yr arguments and there has been zero proof validating mills
The central question remains... is there a state below the accepted ground state?
considering Hydrogen is the most widely studied element in history... I'm with CastroG et al

if there is evidence of it, I await its presentation and subsequent validation
until then, I suggest no

Mar 06, 2019
They should just perform a double-slit experiment, as wave-particle duality is a moving particle and its associated wave in the supersolid dark matter.

Mar 06, 2019
is a moving particle and its associated wave in the supersolid dark matter.

What does that even mean

(And yes: I bet my life's savings that you don't even know what it means)

Mar 06, 2019
Presuming of course the diameter of the silhouette scales with the diameter of the ring singularity

The idea of a "diameter" of anything inside a black hole's event horizon makes no sense. A diameter must be measurable by some type of 'yardstick'.
Ergo stick to the diameter of the silhouette.

Mar 06, 2019
Bob? Why can't you perform the experiment, yourself?
In front of witnesses experienced with using such equipment? Then permit them to use the same equipment to run the experiment themselves?

Yes, you can observe,
No, you cannot dictate how they set up for their recreation of your original experiment.

No, this is your "manifesto" of "SuperSolid Psychics.
You get to pay for the lab-time
& set-up,
equipment rentals,
videography,
coffee service
& lunch.

But hey, in return?
The Nobel Prize dinners are suppose to be pretty good. Something to look forward to.

Mar 06, 2019
And the ground state is zero
"In a quantum mechanical system such as the particle in the infinite square well, the ground-state energy is not zero [as in NOT ZERO]. This lowest possible kinetic energy is called the zero-point energy. Classically a particle at rest in a well has zero kinetic energy and zero velocity."

"For hydrogen (H), an electron in the ground state has energy −13.6 eV, relative to the ionization threshold. In other words, 13.6 eV is the energy input required for the electron to no longer be bound to the atom."

"This new model of the atom predicted the theoretical existence of the hydrino, or energy states of the hydrogen atom that exist below the -13.6 eV energy state of atomic hydrogen that is the basis of Brilliant Light Power's power source."
https://brilliant...verview/
He is not even a physicist
-and neither are you.

Mar 06, 2019
The European Physical Journal D, Volume 66, Issue 5, 2012
and
The European Physical Journal D, Volume 66, Issue 1, 2012
and
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Volume 6, Issue 6, 1 June 2011
-And werent they just summations of standard arguments first posited much earlier? I think they were.

Mill's most significant proposal since then is the idea that the hydrino is dark matter. Lots of new supporting info.

Please do note that Im the one who is refraining from drawing conclusions here. Im just saying maybe so, maybe so. Maybe his melting spheres are parlor tricks, maybe not.

Mar 06, 2019
@otto
And werent they just summations of standard arguments first posited much earlier? I think they were
no
there were 3 separate papers:
"Interpretation of EUV emissions observed by Mills et al." Phelps, Clementson (2012);
"Comment on "Time-resolved hydrino continuum transitions with cutoffs at 22.8 nm and 10.1 nm" " Lawler, Goebel (2012);
and "Patenting free energy: the BlackLight litigation and the hydrogen economy" Rimmer (2011) respectively

those were the starter papers
Mill's most significant proposal... Lots of new supporting info
again, I disagree: lots of speculation or hypothesis from mills, maybe
Please do note that Im the one who is refraining from drawing conclusions here
then also note that, from what I see, the evidence is against mills

until there is evidence supporting mills, with validation, I will have to conclude that the experts who study the subject and debunked mills are correct, unless otherwise proven wrong

Mar 07, 2019

He is not even a physicist
-and neither are you.


And the people who are telling you that he is talking crap are. Including Nobel Prize winners. If you choose to believe this con artist above real physicists, that is up to you. It is a belief. There is no science.

Mar 07, 2019
And the people who are telling you that he is talking crap are. Including Nobel Prize winners. If you choose to believe this con artist above real physicists, that is up to you. It is a belief. There is no science
Which usually comes first - evidence or theory? I never said I believe or disbelieve. I'm only impressed by his demonstrations and his explanations for it.

Tell you what... let's play a game. How many universally-accepted physics axioms can you name that have been called into question or overturned?

I'll go first: cosmological constant.

Your turn.

Mar 07, 2019
Heres an interesting discussion going on in another forum featuring Realitycheck
http://www.intern...12564008

-Im certainly not going to try to repeat it.

Mar 07, 2019
He is not even a physicist

-and neither are you
-which is why I'm not drawing conclusion like mills is a con artist.
Including Nobel Prize winners
And I've shown you that nobel prize winners often talk crap. So what?

Mar 07, 2019
And the people who are telling you that he is talking crap are. Including Nobel Prize winners. If you choose to believe this con artist above real physicists, that is up to you. It is a belief. There is no science
Which usually comes first - evidence or theory? I never said I believe or disbelieve. I'm only impressed by his demonstrations and his explanations for it.

Tell you what... let's play a game. How many universally-accepted physics axioms can you name that have been called into question or overturned?

I'll go first: cosmological constant.

Your turn.


I'm not interested in silly games. Mills is wrong, and has zero evidence for his unphysical claims. The only people who could be impressed by his nonsense are those who are as apparently clueless as he is.

Mar 07, 2019
And I've shown you that nobel prize winners often talk crap. So what?


And I've shown that an unqualified crank is talking crap. Which is why he has zero scientific support.

Mar 07, 2019
And I've shown that an unqualified crank is talking crap
And Ive shown you that youre an unqualified crank talking crap.
I'm not interested in silly games
>snorts and puffs chest

Mar 07, 2019
If @Castro is an unqualified crank you are claiming you have evidence to prove it.

Bring it, @THEGOO.

Mar 07, 2019
And I've shown that an unqualified crank is talking crap
And Ive shown you that youre an unqualified crank talking crap.
I'm not interested in silly games
>snorts and puffs chest


Go mortgage your house, sell your car, and invest the proceeds in this con artist's crap. Brave enough? There is no science backing up this garbage. It is a money making scheme aimed at the gullible and scientifically illiterate.

Mar 07, 2019
da scheide squeeks (back to nicknames I see)
If @Castro is an unqualified crank you are claiming you have evidence to prove it.

Bring it, @THEGOO
Fidel presents a source who says:

"Who is the ENSER corporation? They're an engineering consulting/staffing firm that's located in the same town as Blacklight's offices. So, pretty much, what we're seeing is that Mills hired his next door neighbor"

-and otto counters:
-Same town... well they must be colluding then.

Sorry that shit dont flush. You should be embarrassed to present it
You pinheads should stop wasting time defending fellow tribalists and discuss the science.

Mar 07, 2019
So no money @THEGOO.

Noted.

Mar 07, 2019
da scheide squeeks (back to nicknames I see)
If @Castro is an unqualified crank you are claiming you have evidence to prove it.

Bring it, @THEGOO
Fidel presents a source who says:

"Who is the ENSER corporation? They're an engineering consulting/staffing firm that's located in the same town as Blacklight's offices. So, pretty much, what we're seeing is that Mills hired his next door neighbor"

-and otto counters:
-Same town... well they must be colluding then.

Sorry that shit dont flush. You should be embarrassed to present it
You pinheads should stop wasting time defending fellow tribalists and discuss the science.


We discussed the 'science'. It is crap. You have been conned, you rube.

Mar 07, 2019
And you think this makes sense

"Who is the ENSER corporation? They're an engineering consulting/staffing firm that's located in the same town as Blacklight's offices. So, pretty much, what we're seeing is that Mills hired his next door neighbor"

-which means you dont know how to think at all. But youre in good company. Scheide thinks that
So no money @THEGOO
-is some kind of victory... akin to 'I know you are but what am I?'

So ignorant, so tiring.

Mar 08, 2019
@TheGhostofOtto1923 (and everyone).
Heres an interesting discussion going on in another forum featuring Realitycheck
http://www.intern...12564008

-Im certainly not going to try to repeat it.
An FYI: that "Reality Check" in your linked forum/discussion is NOT ME, "RealityCheck". Note the SPACE between Reality and the Check in that other person's username. My username is ONE WORD, ie, NO SPACE between the Reality and the Check. Thanks.

Mar 12, 2019
hey cern, don't you know dark matter is everywhere

Mar 12, 2019
@TheGhostofOtto1923 (and everyone).
Heres an interesting discussion going on in another forum featuring Realitycheck
http://www.intern...12564008

-Im certainly not going to try to repeat it.
An FYI: that "Reality Check" in your linked forum/discussion is NOT ME, "RealityCheck". Note the SPACE between Reality and the Check in that other person's username. My username is ONE WORD, ie, NO SPACE between the Reality and the Check. Thanks.

Actually, GOO had no space between..

Mar 12, 2019
Actually, GOO had no space between
-my ears? Thats not what I hear-

Mar 12, 2019
This Billion $$$ LHC

Is looking for matter that is dark
in all things
the LHC
in its magnetic confinement rings
it looks for matter that is dark
this matter that constitute 83% of this Vacuum
this vacuous vacuum that is space
and in this 83% of all matter since this creation
does it use this 83% of matter to prove its theory
does it use 53%, 23%, 13%, or even 0.083% of this 83% of matter that is dark
to prove darkmatters existence
is a shred of darkmatter used in this LHCs construction
There is not a shred of darkmatter in this LHCs construction
there is not a shred of darkmatter on this Earth
in fact there is so little darkmatter around us
the LHC is constructed of 100% matter
this Earth is constructed of 100% matter
in fact
to be brutally blunt
there is absolutely no darkmatter in this Universe
as
This Universe is constructed of 100% Matter

Mar 12, 2019
This Universe is constructed of 100% Matter


An opinion of somebody with zero scientific knowledge. Waste of pixels.

Mar 12, 2019
Are, but
This Universe is constructed of 100% Matter


An opinion of somebody with zero scientific knowledge. Waste of pixels.

These are not darkmatter pixels
These are matter pixels

Mar 12, 2019
Are, but
This Universe is constructed of 100% Matter


An opinion of somebody with zero scientific knowledge. Waste of pixels.

These are not darkmatter pixels
These are matter pixels


And you are wasting them. You know the square root of zero about the subject.

Mar 12, 2019
Are, but
Are, but
This Universe is constructed of 100% Matter

An opinion of somebody with zero scientific knowledge. Waste of pixels.

These are not darkmatter pixels
These are matter pixels

And you are wasting them. You know the square root of zero about the subject.

We're a waste of 83% pixels
or
a waste of 27% pixels
Take your pixels

Mar 12, 2019
And you are wasting them. You know the square root of zero about the subject.
.....and how well do you do with square root?

√2 + √2/√2= ?

Mar 13, 2019
Actually, GOO had no space between
-my ears? Thats not what I hear-

Oh, yeah. yer right.
I forgot about the echo effect... :-)

Mar 13, 2019
And you are wasting them. You know the square root of zero about the subject.
.....and how well do you do with square root?

That was actually kind o funny, Benni...

Mar 13, 2019
And you are wasting them. You know the square root of zero about the subject.
.....and how well do you do with square root?

�š2 + �š2/�š2= ?


2.414

Mar 13, 2019
And you are wasting them. You know the square root of zero about the subject.
.....and how well do you do with square root?

��2 + ��2/��2= ?

2.414
......Huh? This is an answer to this:
�š2 + �š2/�š2= ?
Where did you come up with this indecipherable salad of symbols?


Mar 13, 2019
And you are wasting them. You know the square root of zero about the subject.
.....and how well do you do with square root?

�����2 + �����2/�����2= ?


2.414
......Huh? This is an answer to this:
��2 + ��2/��2= ?
Where did you come up with this indecipherable salad of symbols?



They are your undecipherable symbols.

Mar 14, 2019
Actually, GOO had no space between
-my ears? Thats not what I hear
Oh, yeah. yer right.
I forgot about the echo effect... :-)
When I close my eyes I can hear the ocean...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more