Indigenous hunters have positive impacts on food webs in desert Australia

February 18, 2019, Pennsylvania State University
Indigenous hunters have positive impacts on food webs in desert Australia
Drawing of a Rufous Bettong from 'Mammals of Australia', John Gould, 1845-63. Credit: Public Domain

Australia has the highest rate of mammal extinction in the world. Resettlement of indigenous communities resulted in the spread of invasive species, the absence of human-set fires, and a general cascade in the interconnected food web that led to the largest mammalian extinction event ever recorded. In this case, the absence of direct human activity on the landscape may be the cause of the extinctions, according to a Penn State anthropologist.

"I was motivated by the mystery that has occurred in the last 50 years in Australia," said Rebecca Bliege Bird, professor of anthropology, Penn State. "The extinction of small-bodied mammals does not follow the same pattern we usually see with people changing the landscape and animals disappearing."

Australia's Western Desert, where Bird and her team work, is the homeland of the Martu, the traditional owners of a large region of the Little and Great Sandy Desert. During the mid-20th century, many Martu groups were first contacted in the process of establishing a missile testing range and resettled in missions and pastoral stations beyond their desert home. During their hiatus from the land, many native animals went extinct.

In the 1980s, many families returned to the desert to reestablish their land rights. They returned to livelihoods centered around hunting and gathering. Today, in a hybrid economy of commercial and customary resources, many Martu continue their traditional subsistence and burning practices in support of cultural commitments to their country.

Twenty-eight Australian endemic land mammal species have become extinct since European settlement. Local extinctions of mammals include the burrowing bettong and the banded hare wallaby, both of which were ubiquitous in the desert before the indigenous exodus, Bird told attendees at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science today (Feb. 17) in Washington, D.C.

Drawing of Banded-hare wallabies from John Gould Mammals of Australia, 1845-63. Credit: Public Domain
"During the pre-1950, pre-contact period, Martu had more generalized diets than any animal species in the region," said Bird. "When people returned, they were still the most generalized, but many plant and animal species were dropped from the diet."

She also notes that prior to European settlement, the dingo, a native Australian dog, was part of Martu life. The patchy landscape created by Martu hunting fires may have been important for dingo survival. Without people, the dingo did not flourish and could not exclude populations of smaller invasive predators—cats and foxes— that threatened to consume all the native wildlife.

Bird and her team looked at the —interactions of who eats what and who feeds whom, including humans—for the pre-contact and for the post-evacuation years. Comparisons of these webs show that the absence of indigenous hunters in the web makes it easier for invasive species to infiltrate the area and for some native animals to become endangered or extinct. This is most likely linked to the importance of traditional landscape burning practices, said Bird.

Indigenous Australians in the arid center of the continent often use fire to facilitate their hunting success. Much of Australia's arid center is dominated by a hummock grass called spinifex.

In areas where Martu hunt more actively, hunting fires increase the patchiness of vegetation at different stages of regrowth, and buffer the spread of wildfires. Spinifex grasslands where Martu do not often hunt, exhibit a fire regime with much larger fires. Under an indigenous fire regime, the patchiness of the landscape boosts populations of native species such as dingo, monitor lizard and kangaroo, even after accounting for mortality due to hunting.

"The absence of humans creates big holes in the network," said Bird. "Invading becomes easier for invasive species and it becomes easier for them to cause extinctions." The National Science Foundation and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology supported this work.

Explore further: Hunting with fire appears to benefit Australia's small-mammal populations, researchers say

Related Stories

Kangaroos win when Aborigines hunt with fire

August 4, 2014

Australia's Aboriginal Martu people hunt kangaroos and set small grass fires to catch lizards, as they have for at least 2,000 years. A University of Utah researcher found such man-made disruption boosts kangaroo populations ...

Recommended for you

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Thorium Boy
1 / 5 (2) Feb 18, 2019
Yes, only indigenous hunters benefit animals, not evil white middle-class or upper-middle class hunters who decimate animals. Hey! Maybe they can bring back whaling?
wailuku1943
5 / 5 (3) Feb 18, 2019
Reading and trying to understand the article is always recommended. Your comment has zero to do with the research or its conclusions.

A serious attempt to understand what's meant by "patchiness," "food webs" and, importantly, "invasive species" would pay off for you.

Fixating on the single word "hunter," which I can assure doesn't mean the same thing in the Western Desert as it does in Nebraska (for example) would pay off for you also.

That's assuming you actually want to understand the article.
SciTechdude
5 / 5 (1) Feb 18, 2019
Also assuming they are smart enough to tell the difference without sarcastically scapegoating white people every time someone says non-white people are good at something. I bet he doesn't have any idea about things like the fact that Indigenous Australians have the longest unbroken track record of habitation in a single area for any group of humanity, meaning they have been managing the food web there for 60 to 100 thousand years. White men came along and wrecked it all in about 200. But yeah, lets all pat ourselves on the back with fake condescension for being white. Boo Hoo, we can't hunt polar bears for our living room!
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
5 / 5 (1) Feb 18, 2019
That's assuming you actually want to understand the article.


For that handle, IIRC we can't assume that. It produces zero value comments for everyone, including itself.

Else, good work!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.