Do you know the carbon footprint of your food choices?

food store
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Shoppers greatly underestimate the difference their food choices can make to climate change, but they'll favour items with a lower carbon footprint if they're given clear information on the label, according to new research from the University of Technology Sydney and Duke University.

Between 19% and 29% of global come from production, with beef and lamb the biggest contributors, so shifting diets towards greater fruit and vegetable intake is a promising strategy for reducing .

Lead author Dr. Adrian Camilleri wanted to know how well consumers understood the carbon consequences of their , as previous research had shown people significantly underestimate the from electrical appliances.

"With an appliance such as a heater you can feel the energy used and see an electricity bill at the end of the month, so the impact is quite salient, whereas the impact of food production is largely invisible," says Dr. Camilleri.

The study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, asked more than 1000 people to estimate the energy embedded in 19 foods and 18 appliances, and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions associated with those appliances and foods.

The researchers found participants significantly underestimated energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for both electrical appliances and foods—but food was more severely underestimated.

"If you ask people to guess the difference between items such as beef and vegetable soup on the environment they assume there is not much difference, but beef soup creates more than 10 times the amount of greenhouse gases than vegetable soup," says Dr. Camilleri.

"This is a bit of a blind spot because if someone wants to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, they might think to turn off the heater, drive less or fly less. Very few people think to eat less beef."

The researchers also looked at whether they could improve people's perception of the environmental impact of their food choices through the use of labelling, in the same way that a five-star rating system for conveys energy use.

They presented 120 participants with a choice of soups to buy. When the soups had a carbon footprint label, participants bought fewer beef soups and more vegetable soups than when there was no label provided.

The research suggests that the introduction of carbon footprint labels on food items could be a simple intervention to increase understanding of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from food production, and so reduce environmental impacts.

Greenhouse gases emerging from beef and lamb production include those created in the production of fertiliser for feed, methane emitted from the animals, livestock transportation and the loss of trees to clear land for pasture.

A based on fruits, vegetables and grains has the least impact on the environment, with pork, chicken and fish creating a moderate impact, and beef and lamb the greatest impact.

"The choices we make at the can have a significant impact on global challenges such as climate change, and our research shows consumers are keen to make that choice," says Dr. Camilleri.


Explore further

Governments, researchers underestimate impact of inefficient land-use on climate change

More information: Adrian R. Camilleri et al, Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels, Nature Climate Change (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0354-z
Journal information: Nature Climate Change

Citation: Do you know the carbon footprint of your food choices? (2018, December 17) retrieved 18 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-12-carbon-footprint-food-choices.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
29 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 17, 2018
Good God, thousands of so called scientists are wasting millions of man hours on a hoax when they could be preforming useful work for mankind instead of being a parasitic drain on the taxpayers.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more