Teachers and Trump

Teachers felt immense pressure from school leaders and families to respond in a certain way—or not at all—in their classrooms following the 2016 presidential election, according to new research from Michigan State University.

The study, published in the American Educational Research Journal, addresses the widespread but often unspoken idea of political neutrality in the , and how that's not an effective teaching tactic, said lead researcher Alyssa Dunn, assistant professor of education.

"There were many teachers who said they wanted to talk with students about the and related issues but were also afraid of backlash," said Dunn, who conducted the nationwide questionnaire of more than 700 educators.

In the survey, some teachers said they felt election-related topics weren't appropriate in schools or weren't relevant to their subject. Others felt they shouldn't, or couldn't, share their political affiliations or feelings.

But the idea of neutrality, as this research indicates, doesn't always work in schools, because "education is inherently political," Dunn said.

She and her co-researchers argue that by remaining neutral, teachers are enacting the opposite of neutrality by "choosing to maintain the status quo and further marginalizing certain groups."

Dunn and her colleagues, Hannah Carson Baggett of Auburn University and Beth Sondel of the University of Pittsburgh, say the election is just one example of a renewed call for all teachers to consider the ethics of neutrality in the classroom.

"Midterm voting and the impact of results are an opportunity for them to say, 'I'm not going to be neutral,'" Dunn said. "Knowing what means, and how it can be a disservice to students and to themselves, teachers can think about how to adapt their curriculum leading up to and after the midterms and other major events."

Dunn said many educators and administrators believe that because something is happening "outside of ," it isn't relevant in the classroom. But that mentality is an injustice, she argues, and undermines the fact that the classroom is part of the real world.

In a separate study using the same data, the scholars studied what teachers did—or didn't do—in the days after the election. In that study, teachers reported their students were experiencing political trauma.


Explore further

Teacher resignation letters paint bleak picture of US education

More information: Alyssa Hadley Dunn et al, "I Don't Want to Come Off as Pushing an Agenda": How Contexts Shaped Teachers' Pedagogy in the Days After the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, American Educational Research Journal (2018). DOI: 10.3102/0002831218794892
Citation: Teachers and Trump (2018, November 5) retrieved 20 April 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-11-teachers-trump.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 05, 2018
Midterm voting and the impact of results are an opportunity for them to say, 'I'm not going to be neutral.' Knowing what neutrality means, and how it can be a disservice to students and to themselves, teachers can think about how to adapt their curriculum leading up to and after the midterms and other major events.

Rabid liberals excusing yet another form of their often rude, offensive, antisocial and tyrannical behavior.

Note to Dunn et al.: we don't hire teachers to indoctrinate the most impressionable in society, our children, with your brand of political nonsense. Keep your politics out of the classroom or we will have you fired.

Signed,
"Woke" parents

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more