Models show natural swings in the Earth's climate contribute to Arctic sea ice loss

Models show natural swings in the Earth’s climate contribute to Arctic sea ice loss
Arctic sea ice in September 2017, when the ice reached its annual minimum. In addition, a yellow line marks the 30-year average minimum sea ice extent from 1981 through 2010. Credit: NASA

Arctic sea ice loss in the last 37 year is not due to humans alone.

New research by a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) scientist and collaborators show that Arctic is enhanced by natural climate fluctuations such as El Niños and La Niñas. With manmade greenhouse gases on top of the natural climate variability, the decrease in sea ice is even more severe than climate models originally estimated.

Using a series of climate models, the team used a "fingerprint" method to estimate the impact of natural climate variability. Natural swings in the Earth's climate contribute to about 40 percent to 50 percent of the observed multi-decadal decline in Arctic sea ice.

"Internal variability can enhance or mute changes in climate due to greenhouse gas emissions. In this case, internal variability has tended to enhance Arctic sea ice loss," said Stephen Po-Chedley, an LLNL climate scientist and a co-author on a paper appearing in the Nov. 5 edition of Nature Geoscience.

As it turns out, observations of sea ice loss were larger than models predicted. Sea ice loss since 1979 has increased due to natural variability; observations show more Arctic sea ice loss than the climate models average.

"It is important to note that individual runs do show large changes in sea ice that are comparable to observed sea ice changes," Po-Chedley said. "In these simulations, like in the real world, Arctic sea ice loss was enhanced by natural variability.

"When natural variability is taken into account, Arctic sea ice loss is quite similar across models and observations."

According to NASA, the planet has been shedding sea ice at an average annual rate of 13,500 square miles (35,000 square kilometers) since 1979, the equivalent of losing an area of sea ice larger than the state of Maryland every year.

Model simulations (or "runs") exhibit a range of sea ice trends. Depending on the timing of natural fluctuations, individual runs can exhibit greater or smaller-than-average loss. Similarly, both natural and greenhouse gas changes contribute to the observed sea ice loss.

"This study helps to quantify the degree to which natural and anthropogenic factors contributed to Arctic sea ice loss over the last few decades," Po-Chedley said.

The team found that enhanced ridging over the Arctic Ocean promotes warming and moistening in the lower troposphere (the lowest layer of Earth's atmosphere where nearly all weather conditions take place), which in turn, leads to accelerated sea ice loss. Arctic sea ice decline may be important to rainfall in California. Previous research has suggested that Arctic sea ice loss can exacerbate droughts over California.


Explore further

Don't rule out severe global climate change yet

More information: Qinghua Ding et al. Fingerprints of internal drivers of Arctic sea ice loss in observations and model simulations, Nature Geoscience (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0256-8
Journal information: Nature Geoscience

Citation: Models show natural swings in the Earth's climate contribute to Arctic sea ice loss (2018, November 6) retrieved 25 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-11-natural-earth-climate-contribute-arctic.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
244 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 06, 2018
This article is more evidence that computer models of climate don't factor in variables that matter.

I'm sure the climate scientists will just add these additional factors, at which point they'll still be missing many important variables. I wonder if any of them factor in variability of the solar radiation over time, due to changes in the Sun.

Nov 06, 2018
This paper uses sea ice thickness (SIT) from PIOMAS model. SIT is still a highly uncertain variable and least understood with very little observations and high forecast errors. The work is a good effort, but I would avoid jumping onto the conclusions when there are numerous unknown variables, SIT being one of them.

Nov 07, 2018
This article is more evidence that computer models of climate don't factor in variables that matter.
I'm sure the climate scientists will just add these additional factors, at which point they'll still be missing many important variables. I wonder if any of them factor in variability of the solar radiation over time, due to changes in the Sun.


You mean like wobbles, and increase in the axis of the planet due to large earthquakes (happened in early ones) and increased speed of rotation from same cause (happened in early 10s)? The tilt would be a massive influence on polar temp, it also caused a tsunami that raised the arctic sea level in Northern Canada 2 feet, and it stabilized 8" higher than it was before, due to change in the shape of the planet. Increased rotation-even just 1/4 of sec is enough to affect wind speeds, tradewinds, ocean current strength, etc..
Don't forget the unexplained increase in temperature of every object in the solar system.
false data?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more