Can sustainable development co-exist with current economic growth?

Can sustainable development co-exist with current economic growth?
In low-income countries, populations often depend on extractive industries such as fishing, agriculture and mining, but have lower per capita consumption rates and higher population growth. Credit: ARC CoE for Coral Reef Studies/Jacqueline Lau

New research confronts the elephant in the room—the 'trilemma' of population growth, economic growth and environmental sustainability—and reveals the vast incompatibility of current models of economic development with environmental sustainability.

Using data collected from across the globe, national economies and natural resource use were closely examined by an international team of scientists using a mathematical model.

The results suggest that as long as our economic system retains its current structure, and if continues, both high- and low-income countries will fail to achieve environmental sustainability.

The study, published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is led by Professor Graeme Cumming of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University.

"There is a pervasive misconception that economic growth and development will eventually lead to ," said lead author, Prof Cumming.

"While may appear to support a more sustainable lifestyle, in practice, they consume more resources per capita than low-income countries."

"It's just that their ecological and economic impacts are felt in other places."

The researchers found that patterns of resource use for both high- and low-income countries reflected predicable environmental outcomes.

Can sustainable development co-exist with current economic growth?
In this study, Qatar, a high-income desert nation, is found to have a particularly large ecological footprint. Credit: Pixabay, https://pixabay.com. CC0

High-income countries often rely more on non-extractive industries, such as manufacturing and services, but also consume more per capita and import more raw materials.

In contrast, in low-income countries, populations depend more on extractive industries such as agriculture, logging and mining, but have lower per capita consumption rates and higher population growth.

For example, an estimated 500 million people globally rely on the goods and services provided by healthy coral reef ecosystems. The effects of climate change are already revealing threats to livelihoods and a potential ecological collapse that is beyond intervention.

"Feedbacks between income and population growth are pushing countries farther from sustainability," said co-author Professor Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel of the University of Göttingen.

"As a society, we need to find ways to make and good standards of living compatible with ecological sustainability. We can use this knowledge to steer economic growth towards win-win outcomes for people and the environment."

The researchers argue that one key to achieving this is to restructure the economic system, particularly in less wealthy nations where rapid may lead to significant declines in quality of life.


Explore further

Economic development does mean greater carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions

More information: Graeme S. Cumming el al., "Economic growth pathways and environmental sustainability: Understanding development as alternate social–ecological regimes," PNAS (2018). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1807026115
Citation: Can sustainable development co-exist with current economic growth? (2018, September 5) retrieved 15 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-09-sustainable-co-exist-current-economic-growth.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
112 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 06, 2018
Stop feeding people who can't feed themselves. First, you have 200,000 starving, you feed them, then you have 400,000 starving next time. If not for Western advances in agriculture, the Club of Rome's 1960's predictions about "mass starvation by 1980" would have come to pass.

Sep 07, 2018
Actually Thorium Boy those starving people feeding themselves is a prominent factor in environmental destruction, as they destroy forests and key habitats for agriculture and other extractions in order to generate income.
The developed countries do not have sustainable environmental consumption, they just shift the load to other regions.
Both economic growth _and_ population growth, come at the expense of the environment. the "trilemma".

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more