Canada top court rules Hollywood must pay to chase alleged internet pirates

September 15, 2018
Hollywood studios must pay internet service providers to chase down Canadians who illegally download movies or other online content, Canada's Supreme Court ruled

Canada's high court on Friday ruled that Hollywood studios and other copyright holders must pay internet service providers to chase down Canadians suspected of illegally downloading movies or other online content.

The decision will make slightly more difficult efforts to fight infringements under Canada's copyright law.

The amount that internet service providers should be reimbursed to dig up on subscribers accused of infringing on copyrights, however, must still be determined at a future hearing.

"This is an important win for our customers and millions of internet subscribers facing open season on their personal information," David Watt, of Canadian Rogers, said in a statement.

The case was triggered by a group of film producers who got together to fight illegal sharing of their films.

Led by Voltage Pictures, the production company behind "The Hurt Locker" and "Dallas Buyers Club," they sought to know the identity of a Rogers so that they could sue that person.

Eventually they planned to sue about 55,000 more Rogers customers.

Rogers collected the information, but asked the producers to pay a fee of Can$100 (US$77) for it. A court order is also required for such disclosures of .

In court, Voltage argued that charging for the information would make it cost-prohibitive to track down tens of thousands of alleged law breakers.

Rogers says it receives more than two million requests from rights holders per year to send notices to customers alleging breaches in an effort to discourage ongoing infringement.

Taking the additional step to identify those customers to rights holders risked multiplying its administrative costs, which were above and beyond the requirements of the act, it argued.

The Supreme Court in its ruling said Rogers is entitled to "reasonable costs" for complying with so-called Norwich orders, and sent the matter to a lower to determine the amount.

Explore further: Australia clamps down on web pirates in 'Dallas Buyers Club' ruling (Update)

Related Stories

Rogers, Videotron team on wireless service

September 20, 2005

Rogers Wireless and Videotron signed an agreement Tuesday to provide an array of telecom and Internet services to Canadian customers starting next year.

Recommended for you

Privacy becomes a selling point at tech show

January 7, 2019

Apple is not among the exhibitors at the 2019 Consumer Electronics Show, but that didn't prevent the iPhone maker from sending a message to attendees on a large billboard.

China's Huawei unveils chip for global big data market

January 7, 2019

Huawei Technologies Ltd. showed off a new processor chip for data centers and cloud computing Monday, expanding into new and growing markets despite Western warnings the company might be a security risk.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 16, 2018
It is astonishing to me that anyone could argue that external entities, such as internet providers, should have to bear the costs of copyright enforcement. If companies want to sue, they are responsible for figuring out who the target of the suit is.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.