Republicans and Democrats agree on climate change—they just don't realize it

July 20, 2018 by Shelly Leachman, University of California - Santa Barbara
Credit: iStock/leolintang

Just how far apart are Republicans and Democrats when it comes to views on climate change? Not all that far, as it turns out. They're just too party-focused to notice.

That's according to scientists from UC Santa Barbara and the University of Colorado Boulder in new research just published in the journal Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Surveying 2,000 adults, the research team found that, across party lines, there is general agreement that is real, that it is caused by human activity and that something should be done to mitigate it.

The study further reveals that people are more likely to support the same climate proposal when they think that their own political party supports it—and that both Democrats and Republicans overestimate how much their peers oppose the ideas of the other party.

"Democratic and Republican citizens alike evaluate a carbon tax or cap and trade policy based on who proposed it—above and beyond their thoughts on the details of the policy, or on whether it is consistent with their beliefs about the importance of climate change," said David Sherman, a UC Santa Barbara professor of psychological and brain sciences and senior author on the paper. "They do this despite stating themselves that policy considerations should be more important than partisanship."

Added lead author Leaf Van Boven, a psychology and neuroscience professor at CU Boulder, "We found that people routinely place party over policy and disagree for the sake of disagreeing."

Disagreeing for the sake of disagreement

For their project, Sherman, Van Boven and Phil Ehret, who just completed his Ph.D. in social psychology at UC Santa Barbara, set out to explore the psychological reasons that—despite warnings about economic, social and humanitarian impacts of climate change—U.S. lawmakers have yet to enact a national policy.

Previous studies and conventional wisdom suggested this was primarily because most Republicans are skeptical of climate change.

So the researchers conducted two studies in 2014 and 2016 with diverse national panels of over 2,000 U.S. adults, asking: Is climate change happening? Does it pose a risk to humans? Is human activity responsible? And can reducing greenhouse gas emissions reduce climate change?

Sixty-six percent of Republicans, 74 percent of Independents and 90 percent of Democrats said they believed in human-caused climate change and the utility of reducing greenhouse gases.

"Just before the presidential election when most Republicans were voting for Trump, who characterized climate change as a 'hoax,' they nevertheless expressed a belief in climate change," noted Van Boven.

Policy is nearly irrelevant

As part of the 2014 study, the researchers showed participants one of two proposed policies. One was a cap-and-trade policy that historically has been championed by Democrats. The other was a revenue-neutral carbon tax based on policies recently advocated by Republicans. Participants were told that 95 percent of Republicans and 10 percent of Democrats supported the policy, or vice versa.

Regardless of the content, Democrats supported policies from Democrats more strongly, and Republicans supported policies from Republicans more strongly. "If you want to know who will support a climate policy, just look at which political party supports it," Ehret said. "Climate change belief alone is not the whole story."

In a related study of 500 people, co-authored by the same researchers and published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, the authors used actual language from a proposed climate change policy that was part of ballot initiative I-732 in Washington State in 2016.

The researchers highlighted either Democrats or Republicans who genuinely supported or opposed the policy to the study volunteers and found similar results.

"What is more, people anticipate that others, their fellow Republican and Democratic citizens will be even more polarized and influenced by political party than they actually are," Sherman said. "This creates a false norm of consensus and unanimity within each party that, for example, other Republicans will reject any policy proposed by Democrats. This perception of within-party unanimity makes it very difficult to cross party lines."

In a unique contribution of their paper, the researchers also interviewed four retired members of Congress who have worked on environmental issues: Mickey Edwards, R-Okla., Robert Inglis, R-S.C., David Skaggs, D-Colo., and Tim Wirth, D-Colo. All four reported that as climate change became closely associated with Democrats, Republican disagreement increased.

"If you were interested in supporting climate change, that meant you were interested in supporting Al Gore," Wirth told the researchers. In his interview, Edwards said, "Nobody wants to be an outlier—nobody."

This distrust of the other side, combined with a false assumption that the two parties sharply disagree has made it difficult for good, bipartisan ideas to gain traction, according to the researchers.

"One of the foundational insights of social psychology is the under-appreciated influence of social norms and that actions are determined more by perceptions of norms than the actual norms," Sherman said. "It is crucially important for lawmakers and voters alike to be informed about what others actually think about environmental issues such as change.

"There are many reasons the media focuses on differences between partisans," he added, "but our work shows why it is important to highlight this strong consensus as well as the even stronger consensus that citizens should evaluate policies on their details and impact and ability to address problems, and not based on which proposes them."

Explore further: Not all Republicans are climate change doubters: study

More information: Phillip J. Ehret et al. Partisan Barriers to Bipartisanship, Social Psychological and Personality Science (2018). DOI: 10.1177/1948550618758709

Leaf Van Boven et al. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy, Perspectives on Psychological Science (2018). DOI: 10.1177/1745691617748966

Related Stories

Not all Republicans are climate change doubters: study

November 29, 2017

The idea that all Republicans think climate change isn't happening is a myth. A new study published in Springer's journal Climatic Change finds substantial differences in the climate change views of both Republicans and Democrats ...

Recommended for you

Researchers engineer a tougher fiber

February 22, 2019

North Carolina State University researchers have developed a fiber that combines the elasticity of rubber with the strength of a metal, resulting in a tougher material that could be incorporated into soft robotics, packaging ...

A quantum magnet with a topological twist

February 22, 2019

Taking their name from an intricate Japanese basket pattern, kagome magnets are thought to have electronic properties that could be valuable for future quantum devices and applications. Theories predict that some electrons ...

Solving the jet/cocoon riddle of a gravitational wave event

February 22, 2019

An international research team including astronomers from the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn, Germany, has combined radio telescopes from five continents to prove the existence of a narrow stream of material, ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

barakn
4 / 5 (4) Jul 20, 2018
True enough. The Endangered Species Act was signed into law by a Republican, Richard Nixon, and now the orange turd is trying to gut it.
julianpenrod
1 / 5 (5) Jul 20, 2018
Take a lesson where it is offered.
The "research" mentioned in the article asserts that, no matter the party, majorities tend to accept "climate change" as occurring. They emphasize that, "Previous studies and conventional wisdom suggested" that the failure of lawmakers to enact change is because "most Republicans are skeptical of climate change". If the "previous studies" couldn't get it right, why should this "research" be trusted? What faulty methods led to the "conclusion" that Republicans are skeptical of climate change if the supposedly superior methods here say they're not?
Also, what so many fail to accept, politicians know what's going on. It is all happening to make them richer! They aren't "skeptical of climate change", they just don't want to do anything about it.
A reason for that is that, in fact, the change in the weather comes from the government project of "chemtrails", not "fossil fuels".
TheGhostofOtto1923
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 20, 2018
True enough. The Endangered Species Act was signed into law by a Republican, Richard Nixon, and now the orange turd is trying to gut it.
Orange is a color too you know.

Hey that would make a great t shirt-
aksdad
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 21, 2018
There are obvious flaws in this study—probably the survey question wording—because the majority of Republicans do not believe humans are the PRIMARY cause of climate change and they do not believe action needs to be taken to mitigate it. And of course the science is on their side. And that's the reason, folks, why the U.S. has done nothing about it. Despite your precious belief that humans are "causing" climate change, that is actually a minority opinion in the U.S. if you ask precise questions:

"Do you think humans are the PRIMARY cause of climate change?"
"Do you think humans can significantly reduce climate change?"
"Do you think the government should do something to reduce climate change?"
Mark Thomas
5 / 5 (2) Jul 22, 2018
This distrust of the other side, combined with a false assumption that the two parties sharply disagree has made it difficult for good, bipartisan ideas to gain traction


Years ago, I was driving through a small California town in the middle of an Iraq war protest. One side of the street had protesters with signs that read, "Bring them home!" The other side of the street had counter-protestors with signs that read, "Respect our troops!" I thought it the greatest irony that both sides had it right, but were unwilling to open their minds and see the absurdity of the whole thing.

We need to stop relying on misleading labels like "liberal" and "conservative" and develop our critical thinking skills. For example, the giant tax cut for the rich the Republicans put in place in an era of massive budget deficits is clearly NOT conservative, it is massively corrupt.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.