Bolder targets needed to protect nature for people's sake

June 18, 2018, Wildlife Conservation Society
The Niassa Reserve in Mozambique. Researchers argue that the world needs more diverse, ambitious and area-specific targets for retaining important natural systems to safeguard humanity. Credit: JB Deffontaines

University of Queensland (UQ) and Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) researchers argue that the world needs more diverse, ambitious and area-specific targets for retaining important natural systems to safeguard humanity. The findings are published in Nature Ecology and Evolution.

The researchers say that current conservation targets such as Aichi Target 11, established by the Convention on Biological Diversity, currently lack the scope required to support the critical services that nature provides. The authors note that even if fully achieved, Aichi Target 11 potentially leaves 83 percent of the land and 90 percent of the ocean not effectively conserved.

Most evolutionary processes, ecological functions and biota are, and probably will always be, beyond the boundaries of nationally gazetted protected areas. This means that most of the ecosystem services on which humanity relies will be provided predominantly by areas that are not officially protected. Achieving the objectives reflected in the other Aichi Targets, and the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, depends heavily on what happens in that 83-90 percent, the authors say.

"Humanity asks a lot of the world. We need it to purify our water and air, to maintain our soils, and to regulate our climate," said lead author Associate Professor Maron of the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences at UQ. "Yet even as we increase the extent of protected areas, they don't necessarily prevent the loss of . They're often located in areas that might not have been lost anyway—and the current target of protecting 17 percent of terrestrial systems will never be enough to protect species as well as provide the benefits humanity needs."

The authors argue for the need to retain enough of the Earth's natural systems in the right places, to preserve healthy watersheds, to store carbon, to protect the last wilderness areas, and to maintain human-nature interactions, but at the moment we don't have specific, area-based targets for all these goals.

In the article, the researchers say that that reforms are urgently needed on how we make decisions about what nature must be retained, and where.Said senior author James Watson of UQ and WCS: "It is clear that we are running out of time. Every time we analyze humanity's footprint on the planet, we see broad-scale alteration of the last remaining intact, functioning systems. These losses are irreversible and we must acknowledge that the status quo is failing nature and humanity."

Recent calls for the protection of "half earth" and "nature needs half," calling for conservation of 50 percent of the planet, are bold, but the researchers believe this may still fall short of what is needed for the integrity of critical earth systems, like a stable climate.

Said Watson: "We need a big, bold plan. There is no doubt that when we add up the different environmental goals to halt biodiversity loss, stabilize run-away climate change and to ensure other critical ecosystems services such as pollination and clean water are maintained, we will need far more than 50 percent of the earth's natural systems to remain intact. And we must remember that most nations have committed to this in various environmental treaties. It is time for nations to embrace a diverse set of bold retention targets to limit the ongoing erosion of the nature humanity relies upon."

The paper was published as conservationists gather this week in Oxford for a major international conference on Intact Forests in the 21st Century hosted by the University of Oxford and WCS. The conference will bring together leading scientists, researchers, policy experts and practitioners from around the world to review and debate the current state of knowledge relating to intact forests, their values, the threats they face, and the most appropriate responses.

Explore further: Study shows one third of world's protected areas degraded by human activities

More information: Martine Maron et al, Bold nature retention targets are essential for the global environment agenda, Nature Ecology & Evolution (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0595-2

Related Stories

Three urgent steps for better protected areas

November 5, 2015

A group of scientists have developed a three-point plan to ensure the world's protected areas meet new biodiversity targets set by the 193 signatory nations of the Convention on Biological Diversity's (CBD). They recognize ...

Study shows climate value of earth's intact forests

February 26, 2018

New research published today in Nature Ecology & Evolution demonstrates the extraordinary value of Earth's remaining intact forests for addressing climate change and protecting wildlife, critical watersheds, indigenous cultures, ...

It pays to invest in biodiversity

May 18, 2018

In 2010, 193 countries stepped up to halt the global decline of biodiversity by 2020 as part of their commitment to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Recommended for you

Space-inspired speed breeding for crop improvement

November 16, 2018

Technology first used by NASA to grow plants extra-terrestrially is fast tracking improvements in a range of crops. Scientists at John Innes Centre and the University of Queensland have improved the technique, known as speed ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1 / 5 (2) Jun 18, 2018
nature is fine and is getting better as more of the world is brought into the 20th century (it's too much to ask that they be brought into the 21st). Small steps.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.