Global warming of 1.5C or 2C: The lower limit would reduce flood hazards

May 3, 2018, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main
Access to clean water is a major challenge facing many people, such as this boy in the semi-arid Northeast Region of Brazil. Credit: Petra Döll

What difference does it make to the Earth's water resources if humans limit global warming to 1.5°C instead of 2°C? A research group led by Goethe University Frankfurt has simulated these scenarios with global hydrological models. An important result: High flows and thus flood hazards will increase significantly over an average of 21 percent of the global land area if the temperature rises by 2°C. On the other hand, if we manage to limit the rise in global warming to 1.5°C only 11 percent of the global land area would be affected.

According to the Paris Agreement on climate change of December 2015, the increase in global average temperature should be kept well below 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels—if possible, even below 1.5°C. To find out what the two scenarios mean specifically in terms of reducing risks for the global freshwater system, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research commissioned a study which has now been published and is intended for inclusion in the forthcoming special report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on of 1.5°C.

The research group led by Professor Petra Döll from the Department of Physical Geography at Goethe University Frankfurt reports in the current issue of Environmental Research Letters that they used two global hydrological models for the analysis, which were applied to newly developed HAPPI climate simulations. These are more suitable than previous types of simulations for quantifying the risks of the two long-term goals. By calculating seven indicators, risks for humans, freshwater organisms and vegetation were characterized.

"If we compare four groups of countries with different per-capita incomes, those countries with a low or lower middle income would profit most from a limitation of global to 1.5°C in the sense that the increase in flood in those countries would remain far lower than at 2°C," explains Petra Döll, first author of the study. Countries with a high income would profit most of all from the fact that rivers and land would dry out far less in the dry months of the year.

Explore further: Global warming poses substantial flood risk increase for Central and Western Europe

More information: Petra Döll et al. Risks for the global freshwater system at 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming, Environmental Research Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab792

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Evidence of earliest life on Earth disputed

October 17, 2018

When Australian scientists presented evidence in 2016 of life on Earth 3.7 billon years ago—pushing the record back 220 million years—it was a big deal, influencing even the search for life on Mars.

Arctic greening thaws permafrost, boosts runoff

October 17, 2018

A new collaborative study has investigated Arctic shrub-snow interactions to obtain a better understanding of the far north's tundra and vast permafrost system. Incorporating extensive in situ observations, Los Alamos National ...

Arctic ice sets speed limit for major ocean current

October 17, 2018

The Beaufort Gyre is an enormous, 600-mile-wide pool of swirling cold, fresh water in the Arctic Ocean, just north of Alaska and Canada. In the winter, this current is covered by a thick cap of ice. Each summer, as the ice ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.