Ozone at lower latitudes is not recovering, despite Antarctic ozone hole healing

Credit: NASA

The ozone layer - which protects us from harmful ultraviolet radiation - is recovering at the poles, but unexpected decreases in part of the atmosphere may be preventing recovery at lower latitudes.

Global ozone has been declining since the 1970s owing to certain man-made chemicals. Since these were banned, parts of the layer have been recovering, particularly at the poles.

However, the new result, published today in the European Geosciences Union journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, finds that the bottom part of the ozone layer at more populated latitudes is not recovering. The cause is currently unknown.

Ozone is a substance that forms in the - the region of the atmosphere between about 10 and 50 km altitude, above the troposphere that we live in. It is produced in tropical latitudes and distributed around the globe.

A large portion of the resulting ozone layer resides in the lower part of the stratosphere. The ozone layer absorbs much of the UV radiation from the Sun, which, if it reaches the Earth's surface, can cause damage to DNA in plants, animals and humans.

In the 1970s, it was recognised that chemicals called CFCs, used for example in refrigeration and aerosols, were destroying ozone in the stratosphere. The effect was worst in the Antarctic, where an ozone 'hole' formed.

In 1987, the Montreal Protocol was agreed, which led to the phase-out of CFCs and, recently, the first signs of recovery of the Antarctic ozone layer. The at lower latitudes is also showing clear signs of recovery, proving the Montreal Protocol is working well.

However, despite this success, scientists have today revealed that is likely not recovering at lower latitudes, between 60 N and 60 S (London is at 51 N), due to unexpected decreases in ozone in the lower part of the stratosphere.

Study co-author Professor Joanna Haigh, Co-Director of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment at Imperial College London, said: "Ozone has been seriously declining globally since the 1980s, but while the banning of CFCs is leading to a recovery at the poles, the same does not appear to be true for the lower latitudes.

"The potential for harm in lower latitudes may actually be worse than at the poles. The decreases in ozone are less than we saw at the poles before the Montreal Protocol was enacted, but UV radiation is more intense in these regions and more people live there."

The cause of this decline is not certain, although the authors suggest a couple of possibilities. One is that climate change is altering the pattern of atmospheric circulation, causing more ozone to be carried away from the tropics.

The other possibility is that very short-lived substances (VSLSs), which contain chlorine and bromine, could be destroying ozone in the . VSLSs include chemicals used as solvents, paint strippers, and as degreasing agents. One is even used in the production of an ozone-friendly replacement for CFCs.

Dr William Ball from ETH Zurich and PMOD/WRC Davos, who led the analysis, said: "The finding of declining low- ozone is surprising, since our current best atmospheric circulation models do not predict this effect. Very short-lived substances could be the missing factor in these models."

It was thought that very short-lived substances would not persist long enough in the atmosphere to reach the height of the stratosphere and affect ozone, but more research may be needed.

To conduct the analysis, the team developed new algorithms to combine the efforts of multiple international teams that have worked to connect data from different satellite missions since 1985 and create a robust, long time series.

Dr Ball said: "The study is an example of the concerted international effort to monitor and understand what is happening with the ; many people and organisations prepared the underlying data, without which the analysis would not have been possible."

Although individual datasets had previously hinted at a decline, the application of advanced merging techniques and time series analysis has revealed a longer term trend of ozone decrease in the stratosphere at lower altitudes and latitudes.

The researchers say the focus now should be on getting more precise data on the decline, and determining what the cause most likely is, for example by looking for the presence of VSLSs in the stratosphere.

Dr Justin Alsing from the Flatiron Institute in New York, who took on a major role in developing and implementing the statistical technique used to combine the data, said: "This research was only possible because of a great deal of cross-disciplinary collaboration. My field is normally cosmology, but the technique we developed can be used in any science looking at complex datasets."

Explore further

First direct proof of ozone hole recovery due to chemicals ban

More information: Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery, 18, 1379-1394, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2018). DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018
Citation: Ozone at lower latitudes is not recovering, despite Antarctic ozone hole healing (2018, February 6) retrieved 20 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-02-ozone-latitudes-recovering-antarctic-hole.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 06, 2018
I believe it would have been prudent to include a section / paragraph on the direct consequences and effects of ozone depletion and what that will do to people, animals & vegetation. The higher UV means more sun burns and increased risks if skin cancer etc but what else ! Or at minimum the article should include a link to an article that does cover that.

Feb 06, 2018
I believe it would have been prudent to include a section / paragraph on the direct consequences and effects of ozone depletion ...

Steve, if you are interested in science - and presumably you are if you frequent this website - then why don't you make the tiny effort required to type "ozone depletion" into Google search and find out for yourself?

Feb 06, 2018
I think Steve was claiming that higher UV causes more damage than just sun burns and skin cancer. He was not asking for help to figure this out for himself. The issue is educating with a minimum of words with a link for those inclined to learn more. A little extra effort, but still keeping it simple.

Feb 07, 2018
I think Steve was claiming...

If that is the case then I apologize to Steve if my comment was unfairly critical of him. But the thrust of my comment applies to anyone wishing to learn more about ozone depletion. It is not at all difficult to obtain links to more information on subjects reported in news items on phys.org.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more