Beaming with the light of millions of suns

Beaming with the light of millions of suns
The Whirlpool galaxy, or M51. X-ray light seen by NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory is shown in purple, and optical light from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope is red, green and blue. The ultraluminous X-ray source, or ULX, in the new Caltech-led study is indicated. Credit: NASA/CXC/Caltech/M.Brightman et al.; Optical: NASA/STScI

In the 1980s, researchers began discovering extremely bright sources of X-rays in the outer portions of galaxies, away from the supermassive black holes that dominate their centers. At first, researchers thought these cosmic objects, called ultraluminous X-ray sources, or ULXs, were hefty black holes with more than ten times the mass of the sun. But observations beginning in 2014 from NASA's NuSTAR and other space telescopes are showing that some ULXs, which glow with X-ray light equal in energy to millions of suns, are actually neutron stars—the burnt-out cores of massive stars that exploded. Three such ULXs have been identified as neutron stars so far.

Now, a Caltech-led team using data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory has identified a fourth ULX as being a neutron star—and found new clues about how these objects can shine so brightly.

Neutron stars are extremely dense objects—a teaspoon would weigh about a billion tons, or as much as a mountain. Their gravity pulls surrounding material from companion stars onto them, and as this material is tugged on, it heats up and glows with X-rays. But as the "feed" on the matter, there comes a time when the resulting X-ray light pushes the matter away. Astronomers call this point—when the objects cannot accumulate matter any faster and give off any more X-rays—the Eddington limit.

"In the same that we can only eat so much food at a time, there are limits to how fast neutron stars can accrete matter," says Murray Brightman, a postdoctoral scholar at Caltech and lead author of a new report on the findings in Nature Astronomy. "But ULXs are somehow breaking this limit to give off such incredibly bright X-rays, and we don't know why."

In the new study, the researchers looked at a ULX in the Whirlpool galaxy, also known as M51, which lies about 28 million light-years away. They analyzed archival X-ray data taken by Chandra and discovered an unusual dip in the ULX's light spectrum. After ruling out all other possibilities, they figured out that the dip was from a phenomenon called cyclotron resonance scattering, which occurs when charged particles—either positively charged protons or negatively charged electrons—circle around in a . Black holes don't have magnetic fields and neutron stars do, so the finding revealed that this particular ULX in M51 had to be a neutron star.

Cyclotron resonance scattering creates telltale signatures in a star's spectrum of light and the presence of these patterns, called cyclotron lines, can provide information about the strength of the star's magnetic field—but only if the cause of the lines, whether it be protons or electrons, is known. The researchers don't have a detailed enough spectrum of the new ULX to say for certain.

"If the cyclotron line is from protons, then we know that these magnetic fields around the neutron star are extremely strong and may in fact be helping to breaking the Eddington limit," says Brightman. Such strong magnetic fields could reduce the pressure from a ULX's X-rays—the pressure that normally pushes away matter—allowing the neutron star to consume more matter than what is typical and shine with the extremely bright X-rays.

If the cyclotron line is from circling electrons, in contrast, then the magnetic field strength around the neutron star would not be exceptionally strong, and thus the is probably not the reason these stars break the Eddington limit. To further address the mystery, the researchers are planning to acquire more X-ray data on the ULX in M51 and look for more cyclotron lines in other ULXs.

"The discovery that these very bright objects, long thought to be with masses up to 1,000 times that of the sun, are powered by much less massive neutron stars, was a huge scientific surprise," says Fiona Harrison, Caltech's Benjamin M. Rosen Professor of Physics; the Kent and Joyce Kresa Leadership Chair of the Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy; and the principal investigator of the NuSTAR mission. "Now we might actually be getting firm physical clues as to how these small objects can be so mighty."


Explore further

What are neutron stars?

More information: M. Brightman et al. Magnetic field strength of a neutron-star-powered ultraluminous X-ray source, Nature Astronomy (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0391-6
Journal information: Nature Astronomy

Citation: Beaming with the light of millions of suns (2018, February 26) retrieved 15 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-02-millions-suns.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
80 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 27, 2018
Neutron stars are extremely dense objects—a teaspoon would weigh about a billion tons, or as much as a mountain. Their gravity pulls surrounding material from companion stars onto them, and as this material is tugged on, it heats up and glows with X-ray

A teaspoon of this pseudoscientific tripe cost $3-billion-dollars, it ain't worth 2-cents.

Feb 27, 2018
It's worth a hell of a lot more than the unscientific crap you believe in. (This bloke believes Earth used to orbit Saturn. Recently! I kid you not.)
At least neutron stars exist, unlike electric stars, eh?

Feb 27, 2018
Neutron star are the same pseudoscientific fantasy as your non-existent black holes, dark matter, and dirty snowballs. All of these fanciful faerie tales are from the pre-space-age years when gas-lights brightened the streets and jonesdumb was learning how to use an abacus.

Feb 27, 2018
Neutron star are the same pseudoscientific fantasy as your non-existent black holes, dark matter, and dirty snowballs. All of these fanciful faerie tales are from the pre-space-age years when gas-lights brightened the streets and jonesdumb was learning how to use an abacus.


Except for the inconvenient fact that there is plenty of evidence for all those things, and zero for the woo you believe in. Which isn't surprising, as it is all based on the ramblings of the scientifically illiterate moron Velikovsky. Get back to us when you've actually got some proof of something. Hell, even a decent model, written up in a decent journal would be a start. How long has this EU con been going? Decades. And they have accomplished the square root of **** all.

Feb 27, 2018
There is no evidence of your fanciful faerie tales, never seen a BH, never found DM, and nary a dirty snowball has been discovered. It is but your acolyte beliefs which allows you to see these abominations of science.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more