In broadest view yet of world's low oxygen, scientists reveal dangers and solutions

January 4, 2018, University of California - San Diego
Low-oxygen zones are spreading around the globe. Red dots mark places on the coast where oxygen has plummeted to 2 milligrams per liter or less, and blue areas mark zones with the same low-oxygen levels in the open ocean. Credit: GO2NE working group. Data from World Ocean Atlas 2013 and provided by R. J. Diaz

In the past 50 years, the amount of water in the open ocean with zero oxygen has gone up more than fourfold. In coastal water bodies, including estuaries and seas, low-oxygen sites have increased more than 10-fold since 1950. Scientists expect oxygen to continue dropping even outside these zones as Earth warms.

To halt the decline, the world needs to rein in both climate change and nutrient pollution, an international team of scientists including Lisa Levin, a biological oceanographer at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California San Diego, asserted in a new paper published Jan. 4 in Science.

"Oxygen is fundamental to life in the oceans," said Denise Breitburg, lead author and marine ecologist with the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. "The decline in ocean ranks among the most serious effects of human activities on the Earth's environment."

"It's a tremendous loss to all the support services that rely on recreation and tourism, hotels and restaurants and taxi drivers and everything else," said Levin. "The reverberations of unhealthy ecosystems in the ocean can be extensive."

The study came from a team of scientists from GO2NE (Global Ocean Oxygen Network), a new working group created in 2016 by the United Nation's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. The review paper is the first to take such a sweeping look at the causes, consequences and solutions to low oxygen worldwide, in both the and coastal waters. The article highlights the biggest dangers to the ocean and society, and what it will take to keep Earth's waters healthy and productive.

The Stakes

"Approximately half of the oxygen on Earth comes from the ocean," said Vladimir Ryabinin, executive secretary of the International Oceanographic Commission that formed the GO2NE group. "However, combined effects of nutrient loading and climate change are greatly increasing the number and size of 'dead zones' in the open ocean and coastal waters, where oxygen is too low to support most marine life."

In areas traditionally called "dead zones," like those in Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico, oxygen plummets to levels so low many animals suffocate and die. As fish avoid these zones, their habitats shrink and they become more vulnerable to predators or fishing. But the problem goes far beyond "dead zones," the authors point out. Even smaller oxygen declines can stunt growth in animals, hinder reproduction and lead to disease or even death. It also can trigger the release of dangerous chemicals such as nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas up to 300 times more powerful than carbon dioxide, and toxic hydrogen sulfide. While some animals can thrive in , overall biodiversity falls.

Low oxygen caused the death of these corals and others in Bocas del Toro, Panama. The dead crabs pictured also succumbed to the loss of dissolved oxygen. Credit: Arcadio Castillo/Smithsonian

Climate change is the key culprit in the open ocean. Warming surface waters make it harder for oxygen to reach the ocean interior. Furthermore, as the ocean as a whole gets warmer, it holds less oxygen. In , excess nutrient pollution from land creates algal blooms, which drain oxygen as they die and decompose. In an unfortunate twist, animals also need more oxygen in warmer waters, even as it is disappearing.

People's livelihoods are also on the line, the scientists reported, especially in developing nations. Smaller, artisanal fisheries may be unable to relocate when low oxygen destroys their harvests or forces fish to move elsewhere. In the Philippines, fish kills in a single town's aquaculture pens cost more than $10 million. Coral reefs, a key tourism attraction in many countries, also can waste away without enough oxygen.

Some popular fisheries could benefit, at least in the short term. Nutrient pollution can stimulate production of food for fish. In addition, when fish are forced to crowd to escape low oxygen, they can become easier to catch. But in the long run, this could result in overfishing and damage to the economy.

Winning the War: A Three-Pronged Approach

To keep low oxygen in check, the scientists said the world needs to take on the issue from three angles:

Address the causes: and climate change. While neither issue is simple or easy, the steps needed to win can benefit people as well as the environment. Better septic systems and sanitation can protect human health and keep pollution out of the water. Cutting fossil fuel emissions not only cuts greenhouse gases and fights climate change, but also slashes dangerous air pollutants like mercury.

Protect vulnerable marine life. With some low oxygen unavoidable, it is crucial to protect at-risk fisheries from further stress. According to the GO2NE team, this could mean creating marine protected areas or no-catch zones in areas animals use to escape low oxygen, or switching to fish that are not as threatened by falling oxygen levels.Improve low-oxygen tracking worldwide. Scientists have a decent grasp of how much oxygen the could lose in the future, but they do not know exactly where those low-oxygen zones will be. Enhanced monitoring, especially in developing countries, and numerical models will help pinpoint which places are most at risk and determine the most effective solutions.

"This is a problem we can solve," Breitburg said. "Halting climate change requires a global effort, but even local actions can help with nutrient-driven oxygen decline." As proof Breitburg points to the ongoing recovery of Chesapeake Bay, where nitrogen pollution has dropped 24 percent since its peak thanks to better sewage treatment, better farming practices and successful laws like the Clean Air Act. While some low-oxygen zones persist, the area of the Chesapeake with zero oxygen has almost disappeared. "Tackling may seem more daunting," she added, "but doing it is critical for stemming the decline of oxygen in our oceans, and for nearly every aspect of life on our planet."

Explore further: Warmer waters from climate change will leave fish shrinking, gasping for air

More information: D. Breitburg at Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in Edgewater, MD el al., "Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters," Science (2018). science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi … 1126/science.aam7240

Related Stories

Study: Global warming worsening watery dead zones

November 10, 2014

Global warming is likely playing a bigger role than previously thought in dead zones in oceans, lakes and rivers around the world and it's only going to get worse, according to a new study.

Aquatic 'dead zones' contributing to climate change

March 11, 2010

The increased frequency and intensity of oxygen-deprived "dead zones" along the world's coasts can negatively impact environmental conditions in far more than just local waters. In the March 12 edition of the journal Science, ...

Recommended for you

Amazon River pirating water from neighboring Rio Orinoco

August 16, 2018

The Amazon River is slowly stealing a 40,000-square-kilometer (25,000-square-mile) drainage basin from the upper Orinoco River, according to new research suggesting this may not be the first time the world's largest river ...

10 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nik_2213
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 04, 2018
Inshore, what would it take for small, wind- & solar-powered buoys to pump oxygenated surface water down to their anchor ??
Parsec
2.5 / 5 (4) Jan 05, 2018
I am absolutely convinced that climate change is real and action must be taken if we are to avert serious problems.

In this particular case however I do not see the data showing any type of trending or before/now analysis to support any claim of that the changes documented were caused by or even exacerbated by climate change.

Lets all say it together shall we?

Correlation is not Causation.
h0dges
4.2 / 5 (5) Jan 05, 2018
I am absolutely convinced that climate change is real and action must be taken if we are to avert serious problems.

In this particular case however I do not see the data showing any type of trending or before/now analysis to support any claim of that the changes documented were caused by or even exacerbated by climate change.

Lets all say it together shall we?

Correlation is not Causation.


Except when it comes to the solubility of oxygen in water there is a well known temperature dependence!

http://lmgtfy.com...perature
Tessellatedtessellations
1.6 / 5 (7) Jan 05, 2018
This is obviously just more liberal hysteria and fear mongering. The stupid sheeple forget that the entire Earth has been without free oxygen in the past. Besides oxygen is very dangerous to life since it allows fires to burn and, duh, is an oxidizer capable of destroying flesh. Fish may not have to worry much about fire, but it is only a matter of time before THE LIBTARD ELITE start claiming there is less oxygen in the air because the seas are dead. Will they rejoice that there are fewer wildfires in CA, of course not! Damn pessimists out to tax me to death and take my 30 story 4x4 and boggart my okra.
katesisco
1.6 / 5 (5) Jan 05, 2018
When you wake up early am with a headache from low O2 and high CO2 this article will have more meaning. Those scenes on tv with the young guy with an sleep apnea aka insufficient O2 problem is real.
The news articles about drivers filing suit because of a CO2 problem with their car when its really that the highway is a river of CO2 the car is driving in are real.
The climate problems are real but couched in such distant concepts that one is deterred from seeing that our furnace outlets now at ground level is to keep the CO2 in our yard instead of drifting off down to the interstate. We've hidden the problem while pretending to tackle it. Why do we have a 10% efficient internal engine when improvements could have been made long ago? Because it would have cost industry with little profit. An entire new car engine, electric, makes more profit. But will we be around to buy them?
rodkeh
1 / 5 (4) Jan 05, 2018
Except when it comes to the solubility of oxygen in water there is a well known temperature dependence


Apparently not! Look at the map! Dead zones appear in all water temperatures by the look of it and it is only human agriculture to blame.
Nik_2213
5 / 5 (3) Jan 05, 2018
#R, regardless of the variation of oxygen solubility due to temperature, dying algal blooms can consume the lot.
unrealone1
1 / 5 (2) Jan 08, 2018
What was the Oxygen content of the oceans during the Jurassic period?
About 55-56 million years ago. The episode is known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM). The Arctic was Tropical.
The Oxygen content was?
michael_frishberg
not rated yet Jan 08, 2018
When you wake up early am with a headache from low O2 and high CO2 this article will have more meaning. /snip/ But will we be around to buy them?

Ah, when corporate spread sheets show human population going to zero, then we'll see climate change mediation, and not until. We have about 80 years left on Planet Earth, since we aren't going to change anytime soon, or enough.
SteveS
5 / 5 (2) Jan 11, 2018
What was the Oxygen content of the oceans during the Jurassic period?
About 55-56 million years ago. The episode is known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM). The Arctic was Tropical.
The Oxygen content was?


https://www.clim-...2014.pdf

"A global data compilation indicates that O2 concentrations dropped in all ocean basins in response to warming, hydrological change, and carbon cycle feedbacks."

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.