Bacterial biofilm cellulose found to differ from plant cellulose

e coli
Escherichia coli. Credit: Rocky Mountain Laboratories, NIAID, NIH

A team of researchers with members from the U.S., Germany and Sweden has discovered that the cellulose found in bacterial biofilms differs from the cellulose in plants. In their paper published in the journal Science, the group describes how they found the difference and what their findings might mean for developing new ways to combat bacterial infections. Michael Galperin with NIH in the U.S. and Daria Shalaeva with Moscow State University offer a Perspective piece on the work done by the team in the same journal issue.

One of the reasons that bacterial infections can be difficult to treat is their tendency to form biofilms resistant to penetration, making it difficult for to reach and kill them. Such biofilms, Galperin and Shalaeva note, can cause a to shift from an to a chronic infection. Over the years, scientists have studied bacterial biofilms hoping to find a weakness that might be exploited to make them less protective of the bacteria hiding within them. Unfortunately, up until now, little progress has been made in this area. In this new effort, however, it appears the researchers have found something in the makeup of the biofilms that might make it possible to weaken them.

To learn more about the makeup of biofilms created by Escherichia coli, the team took a closer look at some samples using nuclear . They discovered that the cellulose that forms the backbone of the biofilms differed from the cellulose found in plants—it had a phosphoethanolamine sidechain that does not occur in plants. That sidechain allowed for the creation of a form of that was denser than is seen in plants, making it more resistant to shear forces. The researchers also found the gene responsible for it—bcsG. And when they turned that gene off in test bacteria, they found the films produced were less robust. This suggests, of course, that developing a method to turn off the gene in bacteria involved in an infection could weaken the biofilm, allowing antibiotic agents to penetrate and kill them.


Explore further

Scientist finds link between antibiotics, bacterial biofilms and chronic infections

More information: Wiriya Thongsomboon et al. Phosphoethanolamine cellulose: A naturally produced chemically modified cellulose, Science (2018). DOI: 10.1126/science.aao4096

Abstract
Cellulose is a major contributor to the chemical and mechanical properties of plants and assumes structural roles in bacterial communities termed biofilms. We find that Escherichia coli produces chemically modified cellulose that is required for extracellular matrix assembly and biofilm architecture. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the intact and insoluble material elucidates the zwitterionic phosphoethanolamine modification that had evaded detection by conventional methods. Installation of the phosphoethanolamine group requires BcsG, a proposed phosphoethanolamine transferase, with biofilm-promoting cyclic diguanylate monophosphate input through a BcsE-BcsF-BcsG transmembrane signaling pathway. The bcsEFG operon is present in many bacteria, including Salmonella species, that also produce the modified cellulose. The discovery of phosphoethanolamine cellulose and the genetic and molecular basis for its production offers opportunities to modulate its production in bacteria and inspires efforts to biosynthetically engineer alternatively modified cellulosic materials.

Journal information: Science

© 2018 Phys.org

Citation: Bacterial biofilm cellulose found to differ from plant cellulose (2018, January 19) retrieved 22 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-01-bacterial-biofilm-cellulose-differ.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
170 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more