Birth of a storm in the Arabian Sea validates climate model

December 6, 2017
Cyclone Chapala over the Gulf of Aden Nov. 2, 2015. Credit: NASA image by Jeff Schmaltz, LANCE/EOSDIS Rapid Response

Researchers from Princeton University and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) report in the journal Nature Climate Change that extreme cyclones that formed in the Arabian Sea for the first time in 2014 are the result of global warming and will likely increase in frequency. Their model showed that the burning of fossil fuels since 1860 would lead to an increase in the destructive storms in the Arabian Sea by 2015, marking one of the first times that modeled projections have synchronized with real observations of storm activity, the researchers said.

In October 2014, Cyclone Nilofar formed off the western coast of India. The unusual system was the first extremely severe cyclonic (ESCS)—defined by wind speeds greater than 102 miles per hour—on record to appear in the Arabian Sea after South Asia's monsoon season. Cyclones commonly develop in the Arabian Sea after the monsoon season, but none as ferocious as Nilofar, which produced winds of up 130 miles per hour and led to the evacuation of 30,000 people in India.

Then, in 2015, two even stronger extreme cyclones rolled in off the Arabian Sea—in one week. From Oct. 28 to Nov. 4, Cyclone Chapala—the second strongest ever recorded on the Arabian Sea—brought winds of up to 150 miles per hour and dumped the equivalent of several years' worth of rain on the arid nations of Yemen, Oman and Somalia. Cyclone Megh unleased a second wave of destruction only a few days later. The storms killed 27 people and devastated the already fragile economies and infrastructures of the affected nations. The Yemeni island of Socotra was destroyed by flooding and wind damage.

The researchers analyzed simulations of global and regional cyclone cycles shortly after the 2015 storms to help determine their cause.

Especially notable is that their model projected an increase in post-monsoon extreme cyclones in the Arabian Sea by 2015 that was similar to what actually happened, said first author Hiro Murakami, an associate research scholar in Princeton's Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences. It is difficult for a climate model to accurately project for a defined location at a certain time.

"This may be the first time that we see synchronicity between a modeled projection and real observations of storm activity in a specific region during a specific season," Murakami said. He worked with Gabriel Vecchi, Princeton professor of geosciences and the Princeton Environmental Institute, and Seth Underwood at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) located on Princeton's Forrestal Campus.

"It is still challenging to predict the year in which an ESCS will occur in the future," Murakami said. "What we emphasize is that the probability of occurrence is increasing relative to that in preindustrial conditions. It would not be surprising if we see a new ESCS generated in late season in the next few years."

This year, Cyclone Ockhi, which formed Nov. 29 and dissipated Dec. 6, left at least 39 dead in Sri Lanka and India. Belonging to the lower classification of a very severe cyclonic storm, Ockhi was nonetheless the most intense Arabian Sea cyclone since Megh with wind speeds peaking at 115 miles per hour.

These powerful new storms strike areas of the world made vulnerable by poverty, conflict and a lack of experience with a cyclone's heavy wind and rain, Murakami said.

"Large economic losses would be expected in Africa, the Middle East and South Asia along the Arabian Sea," he said. "These countries are highly sensitive to storm hazards and impacts due to a lack of adaption strategies. These regions experience comparatively low climatological storm exposure."

The driving force behind the appearance of the ESCSs was higher-than-normal temperatures. Murakami, Vecchi and Underwood used a high-resolution model at GFDL known as HiFLOR to simulate cyclone activity in the Arabian Sea under two scenarios. The first was natural variability such as some years being hotter than others. HiFLOR is able to reproduce observed variations in the frequency of category 4 and 5 hurricanes in the North Indian Ocean, then project that fluctuation onto other regions and storm systems. This results in a realistic simulation of natural variability.

The second simulation factored in increased atmospheric concentrations of sulfate, organic carbon, black carbon and other compounds that result from human activities. Black carbon and sulfates especially result from burning fossil fuels and biomass such as wood, a popular fuel in South Asia. The researchers ran their simulations with the levels of these substances as they were in the years 1860, 1940, 1990 and 2015.

They found significant increases in the occurrence of post-monsoon ESCSs in the Arabian Sea in 1990 and 2015—the latter of which matched the recent storms. (Real observations of extreme cyclone activity in the Arabian Sea are limited because there was no full weather-satellite coverage in this area before 1998.) New models are being developed to more accurately account for the influence of human-made aerosols on the creation of extreme cyclones over the Arabian Sea, Murakami said.

The paper, "Increasing frequency of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Arabian Sea," was published in the December 2017 print edition by Nature Climate Change.

Explore further: NASA gets a final look at Tropical Cyclone Ockhi's rainfall

More information: Hiroyuki Murakami et al. Increasing frequency of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Arabian Sea, Nature Climate Change (2017). DOI: 10.1038/s41558-017-0008-6

Related Stories

NASA gets a final look at Tropical Cyclone Ockhi's rainfall

December 5, 2017

Tropical Cyclone Ockhi is quickly weakening in the Arabian Sea and is expected to dissipate on Dec. 6 when it makes landfall in northwestern India. The Global Precipitation Measurement mission or GPM core satellite passed ...

Rapid-fire cyclones over the North Indian Ocean

November 6, 2015

With Chapala's destructive landfall in Yemen just a couple of days in the past, a second tropical cyclone, Megh, has just formed in the Arabian Sea. This one is not forecast to become anywhere near as intense as Chapala did—though ...

Recommended for you


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.9 / 5 (11) Dec 06, 2017
Now isn't that the weirdest thing. Hurricanes in Arabia. Looks like another notch in the gun of truth that AGW is altering the climate. If it isn't over there, it's over here. Massive wild fires in CA, Huston floods, Puerto Rico devastated, etc etc and all linked to usage of fossil fuels and the ever *increasing* CO2 levels which is now at 405.14ppm.

1 / 5 (8) Dec 06, 2017
more propaganda ,,, see lots of storms here ,,,https://en.wikipe...Pre-1900

and of course we r just making this up as we go

''(Real observations of extreme cyclone activity in the Arabian Sea are limited because there was no full weather-satellite coverage in this area before 1998.) ''

1 / 5 (5) Dec 06, 2017
Several days before these storms began there was prolonged solar activity with an "Earth directed component".
Their prediction was likely merely a coincidence.
5 / 5 (10) Dec 06, 2017
If you aren't sure which side's more likely to be correct, take a look at the evidence for and against human-caused climate change. That's the good thing about science: it makes you less wrong.

Snoosebaum and cantrdrive, here, are demonstrating how propogandists promote uncertanty and doubt. What they don't realize is that science is all about doubt. The people who are most skeptical about climate change are climate scientists. It's because they're skeptical that they do studies like this one. And it's the results of those studies, in aggregate, that show us beyond a reasonable doubt that climate change is a real threat, caused by humans, and a something we can fix.
1 / 5 (5) Dec 06, 2017
The people who are most skeptical about climate change are climate scientists.

That is the biggest pile of horseshit I've read in awhile. It's their religion in which they are the priests passing around their collection plates. And they don't wait until Sunday, they do it daily.
1 / 5 (7) Dec 07, 2017
Take a look at hard evidence , yes go look at monthly avg charts at weather sites ( if u can find them ) u won't see any hockey sticks.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (8) Dec 07, 2017
Arguing against evidence again.

#climatetrolls and #physicstrolls always argue against evidence. It's their signature.
5 / 5 (10) Dec 07, 2017
I can see making ridiculous and counter factual comments and assertions about climate change in the Post, or the NYT, where the average forum participant isn't too bright.

But coming to a science forum where most of the visitors are going to know your post indicates only ignorance seems sort of like broadcasting one's stupidity in a place where it is maximally visible.
1 / 5 (4) Dec 07, 2017
Interesting ? What things look like isn't evidence . Monthly avg charts look flat .
1 / 5 (1) Dec 07, 2017
5 / 5 (4) Dec 07, 2017
@snoosebaum says;
Take a look at hard evidence , yes go look at monthly avg charts at weather sites ( if u can find them ) u won't see any hockey sticks.

Just follow the link to your enlightenment.

1 / 5 (1) Dec 07, 2017
''Since the hockey stick paper in 1998, there have been a number of proxy studies analysing a variety of different sources including corals, stalagmites, tree rings, boreholes and ice cores. They all confirm the original hockey stick conclusion: the 20th century is the warmest in the last 1000 years and that warming was most dramatic after 1920.''

thanks for making my point , anything cept the actual temp record ordinaire

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.