NIST's next-generation atomic clocks may support official timekeeping

November 16, 2017, National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST physicist Judah Levine with the NIST time scale, an array of hydrogen masers (microwave versions of lasers) that maintains official US civilian time. NIST atomic clocks are used to calibrate the time scale. Credit: Burrus/NIST

For more than a decade, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been unveiling experimental next-generation atomic clocks. These clocks, based on ytterbium, strontium, aluminum, and mercury atoms, among others, have set records for precision and stability.

But, so what? It's all part of NIST's continual effort to improve its ability to maintain and disseminate official U.S. civilian time. A practical question has been when such experimental clocks could begin to be used to support official timekeeping.

New NIST simulations suggest these clocks may now be reliable and practical enough to start contributing to calibrations that support official U.S. civilian time.

Currently, cesium fountain clocks NIST-F1 and NIST-F2 are operated for about one week each month to calibrate NIST time scales , arrays of hydrogen masers—microwave versions of lasers—maintaining official U.S. civilian time for distribution to financial markets and millions of other users around the world. Without such calibrations, official time drifts a bit.

Next-generation clocks operate at optical frequencies, much higher than the microwave frequencies of cesium clocks. Optical clocks are complex physics laboratory setups and typically run only intermittently.

"In principle, the should be the best frequency reference in the building," said Chris Oates, chief of NIST's Time and Frequency Division. "These clocks are getting more reliable, more robust all the time. There have been experiments where they run these things for days."

"We wanted to answer the question, 'Is it worth it right now spending some effort in trying to compare our existing optical clocks to the ?' This paper confirmed that it makes sense to perform a first evaluation."

Indeed, similar first demonstrations are underway at other National Metrological Institutes around the world. In such demonstrations, optical clocks are not generating or keeping official time—rather, they provide extremely stable (intermittent) frequency references that support time generation.

The NIST simulations found that to achieve the same performance as a cesium-fountain-calibrated time , NIST would need to run an optical for 12 minutes every 12 hours, or 1 hour per day, or 4 hours every 2 and 1/3 days, or 12 hours per week. Among other benefits, such calibrations could reduce the error in official time to just 2 nanoseconds (ns), better than current offsets in NIST official time.

Because any timing error gets progressively worse, the study suggests running an optical clock 4 hours at a time at least 3 times a week.

NIST is already using optical clocks to monitor masers in the time scale. The plan now is to build a system to use optical clock results to create a "paper time scale" and accumulate data on how it compares to the real thing. In principle, any time and frequency input can be used to calibrate the time scale; more accurate inputs are given more weight. The expectation is that optical clocks will prove useful for real calibrations even with their modest availability, as they could provide good support while running less often than cesium clocks.

To make the process easier, NIST could operate multiple optical clocks and switch between them for calibration purposes. By running different optical clocks in different time slots, NIST could distribute the workload to different labs and staff.

The NIST simulation study found that various types of optical clocks could be used to calibrate the time scale. That's because most of these clocks have higher stability and lower uncertainty than the time scale, so any uncertainty in estimates of the frequency sources that support official time would be due mainly to the stability limitations of the time scale. Further, NIST official time cannot be more accurate than international standards, so for now there is no pressing need to improve on the time scale.

That could soon change, however. These studies may be helpful in a future redefinition of the International System of Units (SI). The standard unit of , the second, has been based on properties of the cesium atom since 1967. In the coming years, the international scientific community is expected to redefine the second, selecting a new atom as the basis for standard atomic clocks and official timekeeping.

Explore further: Mercury atomic clock keeps time with record accuracy

More information: Jian Yao et al. Incorporating an Optical Clock into a Time Scale, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control (2017). DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2773530

Related Stories

Mercury atomic clock keeps time with record accuracy

July 14, 2006

An experimental atomic clock based on a single mercury atom is now at least five times more precise than the national standard clock based on a "fountain" of cesium atoms, according to a paper by physicists at the Commerce ...

NIST launches a new US time standard: NIST-F2 atomic clock

April 3, 2014

The U.S. Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has officially launched a new atomic clock, called NIST-F2, to serve as a new U.S. civilian time and frequency standard, along with the ...

NIST ytterbium atomic clocks set record for stability

August 22, 2013

A pair of experimental atomic clocks based on ytterbium atoms at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has set a new record for stability. The clocks act like 21st-century pendulums or metronomes that ...

Recommended for you

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.