Wealth redistribution, not tax cuts, key to economic growth

October 18, 2017

President Trump's new tax plan will follow the familiar script of reducing taxes for the rich in the name of job creation. Not only will these trickle-down policies not work—they'll make the problem worse. A new report by a team of complexity scientists demonstrates an alternative: Increase wages to create more investment opportunities for the wealthy, thus creating new jobs and a stronger economy.

In the 10 years since the financial crisis, despite massive economic interventions and zero interest rates, unemployment rates have only now returned to pre-crisis levels. Poverty and debt continue to be widespread, and struggles to reach 3 percent.

The new complexity science analysis describes the flows of money through the economy, not just the overall activity. It shows that there are two cycles of activity that have to be balanced against each other. The first is that workers earn salaries and consume goods and services. The second is that the wealthy invest in production and receive returns on their investments. The two loops have to be in the right balance in order for growth to happen. If there is more money in the worker loop, there aren't enough products for them to purchase. If there is more money in the loop, consumers don't have enough money to buy products so investment doesn't happen.

The paper shows that before 1980, there was too much money in the worker/consumer loop. That money was chasing too few products, giving rise to dangerously increasing inflation. After 1980, likely because of the Reaganomics tax changes, the balance tilted the other way. There was too much money in the investor loop and the result was a series of recessions. The Federal Reserve repeatedly intervened by lowering interest rates to compensate workers' low wages with increased borrowing, in order to increase consumption.

The research shows that the way the government is regulating the economy is like driving a car with only the accelerator and without using the steering wheel. Steering means keeping the balance between the two loops in the right proportion. While Federal Reserve interventions have helped overcome the recessions, today, we are up against the guardrail and need to rebalance the economy by shifting money back to the labor/consumer loop.

Since 1980, consumers have accumulated trillions of dollars of debt, and the wealthy have accumulated trillions of dollars of savings that is not invested because there is nothing to invest in that will give returns. This is the result of government policy reducing taxes for the wealthy in the name of increasing economic activity. No matter how much money investors have, these so-called "job creators" do not create jobs when consumers don't have to buy products. Increased requires both investment and purchase power to pay for the things the investment will produce.

The research shows that Reaganomics had the right idea at the time, but there is need today for a new, bold policy change in the opposite direction. The economy will grow if the flow is shifted toward workers/ and away from wealthy investors. The work cautions, however, that this has to be done in the right amount. Reaganomics moved things too far toward the wealthy, so shifting the flow in the other direction has to be done in the right measure.

The results suggest that current approaches to correcting economic problems by reducing government spending (austerity), while decreasing taxes for the wealthy to promote investment, are misguided. They may have been good policies in 1980, but they are long outdated today. It turns out that economic inequality is not just a social justice problem, but actually an economic problem. Fixing will have dramatic benefits for economic growth.

Explore further: Don't listen to the rich—inequality is bad for everyone

More information: Preliminary steps toward a universal economic dynamics for monetary and fiscal policy, New England Complex Systems Institute (October 10, 2017). necsi.edu/research/economics/econuniversal

Related Stories

Don't listen to the rich—inequality is bad for everyone

August 7, 2017

A world where a few people have most of the wealth motivates others who are poor to strive to earn more. And when they do, they'll invest in businesses and other areas of the economy. That's the argument for inequality. But ...

Study: Child health may suffer in strong economy

March 18, 2010

A short-term economic boom is not always a good thing for children in developing nations, according to a new study in the Journal of Political Economy. The study found that when Colombia's coffee trade suddenly booms, illness ...

Recommended for you

The oldest plesiosaur was a strong swimmer

December 14, 2017

Plesiosaurs were especially effective swimmers. These long extinct "paddle saurians" propelled themselves through the oceans by employing "underwater flight"—similar to sea turtles and penguins. Paleontologist from the ...

Averaging the wisdom of crowds

December 12, 2017

The best decisions are made on the basis of the average of various estimates, as confirmed by the research of Dennie van Dolder and Martijn van den Assem, scientists at VU Amsterdam. Using data from Holland Casino promotional ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

szore88
1 / 5 (2) Oct 18, 2017
WRONG. Typical Communist BS. "Wealth redistribution" is a welfare fantasy. Look at Europe. BANKRUPT.
SkyAbove
3 / 5 (1) Oct 18, 2017
We see and friends tell us that homelessness, underemployment and stagnate wages are a gigantic growing problem in the US. Cities and towns are decaying around us. It all began with Reagan's policies of diverting money to the wealthy and diverting cost to the lower & middle classes. Trickle-down theory is a regressive theory dating back 100 years to Herbert Spencer's Survival of the Fittest theory. We all know how well that theory worked.
rrwillsj
1 / 5 (1) Nov 11, 2017
Well s8, the robot replacing you in your job? To reduce labor costs and pump up profits.

Will be programmed to agree with you. I'm sure Homeland Security is busy, busy, busy making sure your owner is not pestered by any nasty consequences of plutocracy.

Such as Civic Virtue or Social Conscience. And you and your family can smugly starve in a homeless encampment. Enjoying all the non-existent benefits of an unfettered Wall Street Casino.

Cause you made it clear to them, you are prey and you will meekly submit your family to their predatory awesomeness.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.