New study highlights the impacts of a global strategy to reduce antibiotic consumption in food animal production

September 28, 2017, Burness
Antimicrobial consumption for food animal production by country in 2013 (light red) and projected for 2030 (dark red). Credit: Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy

A new study in Science by researchers at the Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy (CDDEP) and partners analyzes and describes a comprehensive strategy for preserving antibiotic effectiveness by reducing antibiotic use in farm animals up to 80 percent globally by the year 2030. The study was co-authored by researchers at the Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University (USA); Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich (Switzerland); the Université Libre de Bruxelles (Belgium); and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Italy).

Overuse of in animal food production is fueling a global health crisis in antibiotic resistance. Nearly 80 percent of all antibiotics used in the United States are given to food , mainly for growth promotion. Global antibiotic use in food animals outweighs human by nearly three times. Left unchecked, antibiotic use in food animal production will rise 53 percent globally between 2013 and 2030.

"This scale up in antibiotics, primarily as a substitute for good nutrition and hygiene in livestock production, is simply unsustainable and will be devastating to efforts to conserve the effectiveness of our current antibiotics. We already face a crisis, but continuing to use medically important antibiotics for growth promotion in animals is like pouring oil on a fire," said the study's senior author and CDDEP Director Ramanan Laxminarayan.

In the Science study, researchers estimated the global impact of three interventions on reducing antibiotic use in animals. Together, these interventions could reduce animal consumption of antibiotics worldwide by up to 80 percent.

Antimicrobial consumption in largest consumers in 2013 and projected in 2030. Credit: Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy

  1. Regulations capping the use of antibiotics in could achieve a 64 percent reduction in consumption.
  2. Limiting meat intake to the equivalent of one fast-food burger per person per day globally, could reduce antibiotic consumption in animals by 66 percent.
  3. Imposing a 50 percent user fee on the price of could reduce consumption by 31 percent while generating revenues of US $ 1.7 billion to $4.6 billion per year, which could be used to spur drug development.

Globally, more than 131,000 tons of antibiotics were used in animals in 2013, the researchers found. By 2030, projected consumption will increase to more than 200,000 tons. The current top five users of antibiotics in food production, by country, are:

  • China - 78,200 tons in 2013 (projected to increase 59 percent by 2030)
  • United States - 9,476 tons (projected increase of 22 percent by 2030)
  • Brazil - 6,448 tons (projected increase of 41 percent by 2030)
  • India - 2,633 tons (projected increase of 82 percent by 2030)
  • Spain - 2,202 tons (projected increase of 6 percent by 2030)
Antimicrobial consumption per population correction unit (PCU) by class of antimicrobials. Credit: Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy

Even in many countries where current use of antibiotics for food production is relatively low, researchers predict that consumption will explode over the next dozen years. For example, in Uganda, which used 199 tons of antibiotics for food animals in 2013, consumption is projected to double by 2030. And consumption is projected to increase 215 percent in Vietnam, which used 515 tons of antibiotics for production in 2013.

Last year's meeting on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the United Nations General Assembly recognized the inappropriate use of these drugs in animals as a leading cause of rising AMR. "We face a critical choice if we are to have antibiotics that work. We can restrict our meat consumption to a recommended daily intake, or adopt state-of-art livestock practices globally to reduce antibiotic consumption," study author Thomas Van Boeckel noted. "We cannot have both without putting the health of future populations at risk."

"A modest user fee on the price on veterinary antibiotics is appropriate given the magnitude of the threat and could discourage livestock rearing practices that involve using large quantities of antibiotics," Laxminarayan added. "We must act decisively and we must act now, in a comprehensive manner, to preserve antibiotic effectiveness," he said.

Explore further: High levels of antibiotic-resistance in Indian poultry farming raises concerns

More information: T.P. Van Boeckel el al., "Reducing global antimicrobial use in food animals," Science (2017). science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi … 1126/science.aao1495

Related Stories

Why we should tax meat that contains antibiotics

April 5, 2017

The use of antibiotics in meat production is a major contributor to one of the biggest threats facing human health in the 21st century: antibiotic resistance. Finding a solution to this requires us to start taking responsibility ...

Fish food for marine farms harbor antibiotic resistance genes

August 30, 2017

From isolated caves to ancient permafrost, antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes for resistance have been showing up in unexpected places. As scientists puzzle over how genes for antibiotic resistance arise in various environments ...

Recommended for you

Old species learn new tricks... very slowly

August 15, 2018

A quick look at the fossil record shows that no species lasts forever. On average, most species exist for around a million years, although some species persist for much longer. A new study published in Scientific Reports ...

The secret behind cell revival revealed

August 15, 2018

Scientists from the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), have identified 85 genes essential for fission yeast cells at rest, under nutritionally limited environmental conditions, to maintain ...

How gene hunting changed the culture of science

August 15, 2018

Years after the end of the Human Genome Project (HGP), which mapped the human genetic blueprint, its contributions to science and scientific culture are still unfolding. Ioannis Pavlidis, Eckhard Pfeiffer Professor of Computational ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.