Three-degree rise in temperature will cancel out European emission reduction efforts

Three-degree rise in temperature will cancel out European emission reduction efforts
Credit: Shutterstock

As a debilitating heatwave, nicknamed 'Lucifer' by the press, currently engulfs southern Europe, a new study part-supported by two EU-funded projects has warned that a rise in global temperatures of three degrees would reverse Europe's dedicated efforts to reduce ozone pollution.

Despite the COP21 international agreement to reduce global warming to below two degrees, the research team behind the study published in Nature Communications has warned that a global temperature rise of about three degrees is not only possible but highly likely when considering the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions submitted for the COP21.

Specifically, the study argues that if states reduce their as promised at COP 21 in 2015, the planet could warm by three degrees in 2050 compared to the pre-industrial era. For several decades, European regulations to limit the emissions of ozone have improved and could theoretically continue to bear fruit by 2050. But climate change and, in parallel, continued through emissions being generated in other regions of the world would tip the balance against such stringent European efforts. Indeed, for the three degrees increase scenario, climatologists predict that there would be an overall doubling by 2100 of the global concentration of methane.

Through numerical simulations using a cascade of models of atmospheric chemistry and climate, developed within the EU-funded ECLIPSE project (that ended in 2015), the researchers have warned that in this scenario European efforts to reduce ozone emissions be effectively cancelled out. They also argue that the greatest impact would be on industrial regions, big cities and southern Europe. With a rise in temperatures by three degrees instead of two, air quality would clearly degrade, especially in southeastern Europe, where the health of the population could be severely exposed to an average of 100 ozone exceedance days a year. The researchers warn that considering the adverse effects of even short-term exposure to daily ozone concentrations, this would strongly impact both human health, as well as vegetation.

To overcome these obstacles, the research team argues that if European air quality is to be improved, then there must be concerted global regulation on global methane emissions, which would provide positive effects on regional air quality but also benefit the fight against climate change. Moreover, it is important to note that these projections relate to a specific region and climate scenario, and the authors explain that different or temperature trajectories may alter the predicted increases.

As well as being supported by the ECLIPSE project, the authors also acknowledge support from the EU-funded IMPACT2C project, also officially ended in 2015, which comprehensively mapped the effects of climate change on Europe from a two degree rise in . Together, both projects received nearly EUR 9 million of EU funding.

With southern Europe continuing to bake in the 'Lucifer' heatwave and the recent release of another article that warns up to 150 000 people could be killed per year in Europe as a result of change, it is evermore obvious that to effectively fight growing air pollution, Europe must continue to cooperate and encourage its global partners to also take effective and decisive action against as outlined in the COP21 agreement.

Explore further

Government report sees drastic climate change impact in US: NYT

More information: ECLIPSE—Evaluating the Climate and Air Quality Impacts of Short-Lived Pollutants:

IMPACT2C—Quantifying projected impacts under 2°C warming:

Journal information: Nature Communications

Provided by CORDIS
Citation: Three-degree rise in temperature will cancel out European emission reduction efforts (2017, August 14) retrieved 31 March 2020 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments