Experimental method measures robustness of quantum coherence

July 27, 2017, Autonomous University of Barcelona

Researchers at the UAB have come up with a method to measure the strength of the superposition coherence in any given quantum state. The method, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A, is based on the measurement of experimental parameters related to the visibility of the interference fringe patterns produced when the two states are superimposed.

One of the main principles of quantum physics is the superposition of states. Systems are simultaneously in different states, i.e. "alive and dead" at the same time, in the case of the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment. When measured, the superstate collapses to one of the possibilities. As long as the superposition lasts, the system is said to be in a coherent state. In real systems, a set of diverse elemental particles or atoms existing in a state of superposition—for example, in different positions simultaneously, with different levels of energy, or with two opposite spins (rotating trajectories)—are said to have weak coherence. The superposition is broken easily by the vibrations associated with temperature and environmental interactions.

Researchers from the UAB Department of Physics and the Indian Institute of Science, Education and Research Kolkata propose a new way of measuring the robustness of the of a superimposed state. The method is based on the measurement of the visibility of characterized by alternate dark and intense stripes produced when two coherent states coincide.

According to UAB researcher Andreas Winter, "The existence of quantum superpositions is at the heart of the non-classical nature of . It manifests itself by producing interference patterns in interferometric experiments. We show that each visibility parameter of the , such as the difference between maximums and minimums in intensity, gives rise to a measure of coherence. The study thus connects the recently burgeoning, but hitherto abstract resource theory of coherence to concrete and physically relevant observations."

The scientists, experts in information quantum theory, study the intrinsic properties of quantum mechanics such as entanglement, uncertainty, superposition, indeterminism and interference, to be used as resources in , the foundation of future quantum computers.

Explore further: New 'quantum distillation' method allows measuring coherence of quantum states

More information: Tanmoy Biswas et al. Interferometric visibility and coherence, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science (2017). DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2017.0170

Related Stories

Physicists quantify the usefulness of 'quantum weirdness'

April 13, 2016

(Phys.org)—For the past 100 years, physicists have been studying the weird features of quantum physics, and now they're trying to put these features to good use. One prominent example is that quantum superposition (also ...

Physicists breeding Schroedinger cat states

May 1, 2017

Physicists have learned how they could breed Schrödinger cats in optics. Scientists tested a method that could potentially amplify superpositions of classical states of light beyond microscopic limits and help determine ...

Physicists seek to quantify macroscopic quantum states

June 29, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- "Scientists have been interested in generating and observing macroscopic quantum superpositions in order to test quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale," physicist Hyunseok Jeong of Seoul National University ...

Recommended for you

Magic number colloidal clusters

December 14, 2018

Complexity in nature often results from self-assembly, and is considered particularly robust. Compact clusters of elemental particles can be shown to be of practical relevance, and are found in atomic nuclei, nanoparticles ...

Tangled magnetic fields power cosmic particle accelerators

December 13, 2018

Magnetic field lines tangled like spaghetti in a bowl might be behind the most powerful particle accelerators in the universe. That's the result of a new computational study by researchers from the Department of Energy's ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 28, 2017
This makes no sense. We begin with all possible states based upon known physics, build a wave equation with the possibilities, then filter out the wavelets, or define events. Why not simply use the known physics, without scrambling, every wavelet describes the motion of a charge center. Bypass the over generalization and simply be specific!

Applying wavelet to motion, as a computer filter, i.e. actuality!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.