Using nature to build nanomachines

Using nature to build nanomachines
Schematic diagram of the bacterial flagellar basal body with name and size of each part. Credit: Osaka University

Flagella are tiny rotary motors that move bacteria. A research team led by Keiichi Namba, professor at Osaka University has used electron cryomicroscopy to show that a small difference of only several amino acids can have a large impact on flagella function. The study gives new insight on the construction of synthetic nanomachines and can be read in Nature Communications.

The flagellar motor can be subdivided into three subunits that include the helical propeller (filament), universal joint (hook), and drive shaft (rod). The hook is flexible and transmits torque to the filament, while the rod is remarkably stiff and can rotate >1000 Hz in some bacteria. The hook is 55 nm long and 18 nm wide, and the rod is 20 nm long and 13 nm wide. Structurally, the hook consists of one protein, FlgE, while the rod consists of several proteins, but only FlgG is in direct contact with the hook. FlgE and FlgG include two domains that are thought responsible for the very different mechanical properties of the rod and hook even though in many ways the domains are almost identical.

"The different functions can be explained by how the domains are packed," said Namba, whose lab studies nanomachines in nature, adding that, "In the rod, they are highly packed, which makes the rod rigid. In the hook, the domains are spaced out, giving the hook flexibility."

High-resolution images and corresponding atomic models suggested the different packing is related to a slightly different tilt of 7o in the orientation of the domains. This 7o tilt reduces the packing, which allows the hook protofilament to compress and expand, explaining its flexibility.

Using nature to build nanomachines
Molecular models of the flagellar rod (purple) and hook (blue green) and their comparison. (a) The model of the rod and hook complex including their direct connection in a section along their tubular axis. The structures of their corresponding domains are nearly identical. (b) Structural comparison of the rod and hook subunits by superposition. Domain D1 of the hook protein is more tilted than that of the rod protein by 7°, producing a gap between subunits in the axial neighbors to make the entire hook flexible in bending. (c) The C-terminal helix (blue) of the hook is shorter than that of the rod, making an axial gap between subunits in the hook structure but not in the rod. Credit: Osaka University

Namba noted that although similar, one particular part the two proteins is longer in FlgG by 18 amino acids. To confirm that these determined the rigidity of the rod, his team inserted them to the hook protein and found that the hook became much stiffer.

"The 18 amino acid insert shows how a small changes can drastically change the behavior of a nanomachine," he said.

Understanding the structural design of the flagellar motor is expected to provide a blueprint for the synthetic construction of similar nanomachines.

More information: Takashi Fujii et al, Identical folds used for distinct mechanical functions of the bacterial flagellar rod and hook, Nature Communications (2017). DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14276

Journal information: Nature Communications

Provided by Osaka University

Citation: Using nature to build nanomachines (2017, March 9) retrieved 30 November 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Atomic resolution of muscle contraction


Feedback to editors