The curious case of Earth's leaking atmosphere

July 8, 2016, European Space Agency
Artist's impression of Earth's magnetosphere and leaky upper atmosphere. Credit: ESA/ATG medialab

Earth's atmosphere is leaking. Every day, around 90 tonnes of material escapes from our planet's upper atmosphere and streams out into space. Although missions such as ESA's Cluster fleet have long been investigating this leakage, there are still many open questions. How and why is Earth losing its atmosphere – and how is this relevant in our hunt for life elsewhere in the Universe?

Given the expanse of our atmosphere, 90 tonnes per day amounts to a small leak. Earth's atmosphere weighs in at around five quadrillion (5 × 1015) tonnes, so we are in no danger of running out any time soon. However, understanding Earth's atmosphere, and how it escapes to space, is key to understanding the atmospheres of other planets, and could be crucial in our hunt for habitable planets and extraterrestrial life.

We have been exploring Earth's magnetic environment for years using satellites such as ESA's Cluster mission, a fleet of four spacecraft launched in 2000. Cluster has been continuously observing the magnetic interactions between the Sun and Earth for over a decade and half; this longevity, combined with its multi-spacecraft capabilities and unique orbit, have made it a key player in understanding both Earth's leaking atmosphere and how our planet interacts with the surrounding Solar System.

Earth's magnetic field is complex; it extends from the interior of our planet out into space, exerting its influence over a region of space dubbed the .

The magnetosphere – and its inner region (the plasmasphere), a doughnut-shaped portion sitting atop our atmosphere, which co-rotates with Earth and extends to an average distance of 20 000 km – is flooded with charged particles and ions that are trapped, bouncing back and forth along field lines.

At its outer Sunward edge the magnetosphere meets the , a continuous stream of charged particles – mostly protons and electrons – flowing from the Sun. Here, our magnetic field acts like a shield, deflecting and rerouting the incoming wind as a rock would obstruct a stream of water. This analogy can be continued for the side of Earth further from the Sun – particles within the solar wind are sculpted around our planet and slowly come back together, forming an elongated tube (named the magnetotail), which contains trapped sheets of plasma and interacting field lines.

Artist's impression of Earth's magnetosphere. Credit: ESA/ATG medialab

Weaknesses in our magnetic shield

However, our magnetosphere shield does have its weaknesses; at Earth's poles the field lines are open, like those of a standard bar magnet (these locations are named the polar cusps). Here, solar wind particles can head inwards towards Earth, filling up the magnetosphere with energetic particles.

Just as particles can head inwards down these open polar lines, particles can also head outwards. Ions from Earth's – the ionosphere, which extends to roughly 1000 km above the Earth – also flood out to fill up this region of space. Although missions such as Cluster have discovered much, the processes involved remain unclear.

"The question of plasma transport and atmospheric loss is relevant for both planets and stars, and is an incredibly fascinating and important topic. Understanding how atmospheric matter escapes is crucial to understanding how life can develop on a planet," said Arnaud Masson, ESA's Deputy Project Scientist for the Cluster mission. "The interaction between incoming and outgoing material in Earth's magnetosphere is a hot topic at the moment; where exactly is this stuff coming from? How did it enter our patch of space?"

Initially, scientists believed Earth's magnetic environment to be filled purely with particles of solar origin. However, as early as the 1990s it was predicted that Earth's atmosphere was leaking out into the plasmasphere – something that has since turned out to be true.

Observations have shown sporadic, powerful columns of plasma, dubbed plumes, growing within the plasmasphere, travelling outwards to the edge of the magnetosphere and interacting with solar wind plasma entering the magnetosphere.

More recent studies have unambiguously confirmed another source – Earth's atmosphere is constantly leaking! Alongside the aforementioned plumes, a steady, continuous flow of material (comprising oxygen, hydrogen, and helium ions) leaves our planet's plasmasphere from the polar regions, replenishing the plasma within the magnetosphere. Cluster found proof of this wind, and has quantified its strength for both overall (reported in a paper published in 2013) and for hydrogen ions in particular (reported in 2009).

Artist's impression of the plasmasphere in Earth's magnetosphere. Credit: ESA/ATG medialab

Overall, about 1 kg of material is escaping our atmosphere every second, amounting to almost 90 tonnes per day. Singling out just cold ions (light hydrogen ions, which require less energy to escape and thus possess a lower energy in the magnetosphere), the escape mass totals thousands of tonnes per year.

Cold ions are important; many satellites – Cluster excluded – cannot detect them due to their low energies, but they form a significant part of the net matter loss from Earth, and may play a key role in shaping our magnetic environment.

Solar storms and periods of heightened solar activity appear to speed up Earth's atmospheric loss significantly, by more than a factor of three. However, key questions remain: How do ions escape, and where do they originate? What processes are at play, and which is dominant?

Where do the ions go? And how?

One of the key escape processes is thought to be centrifugal acceleration, which speeds up ions at Earth's poles as they cross the shape-shifting magnetic field lines there. These ions are shunted onto different drift trajectories, gain energy, and end up heading away from Earth into the magnetotail, where they interact with plasma and return to Earth at far higher speeds than they departed with – a kind of boomerang effect.

Such high-energy particles can pose a threat to space-based technology, so understanding them is important. Cluster has explored this process multiple times during the past decade and a half – finding it to affect heavier ions such as oxygen more than lighter ones, and also detecting strong, high-speed beams of ions rocketing back to Earth from the magnetotail nearly 100 times over the course of three years.

More recently, scientists have explored the process of magnetic reconnection, one of the most efficient physical processes by which the solar wind enters Earth's magnetosphere and accelerates plasma. In this process, plasma interacts and exchanges energy with magnetic field lines; different lines reconfigure themselves, breaking, shifting around, and forging new connections by merging with other lines, releasing huge amounts of energy in the process.

The four Cluster spacecraft crossing the northern cusp of Earth's magnetosphere. Credit: ESA/AOES Medialab

Here, the cold ions are thought to be important. We know that cold ions affect the magnetic reconnection process, for example slowing down the reconnection rate at the boundary where the solar wind meets the magnetosphere (the magnetopause), but we are still unsure of the mechanisms at play.

"In essence, we need to figure out how cold plasma ends up at the magnetopause," said Philippe Escoubet, ESA's Project Scientist for the Cluster mission. "There are a few different aspects to this; we need to know the processes involved in transporting it there, how these processes depend on the dynamic solar wind and the conditions of the magnetosphere, and where plasma is coming from in the first place – does it originate in the ionosphere, the plasmasphere, or somewhere else?"

Recently, scientists modelled and simulated Earth's magnetic environment with a focus on structures known as plasmoids and flux ropes – cylinders, tubes, and loops of plasma that become tangled up with . These arise when the magnetic reconnection process occurs in the magnetotail and ejects plasmoids both towards the outer tail and towards Earth.

Cold ions may play a significant role in deciding the direction of the ejected plasmoid. These recent simulations showed a link between plasmoids heading towards Earth and heavy oxygen ions leaking out from the ionosphere – in other words, oxygen ions may reduce and quench the reconnection rates at certain points within the magnetotail that produce tailward trajectories, thus making it more favourable at other sites that instead send them Earthwards. These results agree with existing Cluster observations.

Another recent Cluster study compared the two main atmospheric escape mechanisms Earth experiences – sporadic plumes emanating through the plasmasphere, and the steady leakage of Earth's atmosphere from the ionosphere – to see how they might contribute to the population of cold ions residing at the dayside magnetopause (the magnetosphere-solar wind boundary nearest the Sun).

Both escape processes appear to depend in different ways on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), the solar magnetic field that is carried out into the Solar System by the solar wind. This field moves through space in a spiralling pattern due to the rotation of the Sun, like water released from a lawn sprinkler. Depending on how the IMF is aligned, it can effectively cancel out part of Earth's magnetic field at the magnetopause, linking up and merging with our field and allowing the solar wind to stream in.

Plumes seem to occur when the IMF is oriented southward (anti-parallel to Earth's magnetic field, thus acting as mentioned above). Conversely, leaking outflows from the ionosphere occur during northward-oriented IMF. Both processes occur more strongly when the solar wind is either denser or travelling faster (thus exerting a higher dynamic pressure).

Magnetic reconnection in the tail of Earth's magnetosphere. Credit: ESA/ATG medialab

"While there is still much to learn, we've been able to make great progress here," said Masson. "These recent studies have managed to successfully link together multiple phenomena – namely the ionospheric leak, plumes from the plasmasphere, and magnetic reconnection – to paint a better picture of Earth's magnetic environment. This research required several years of ongoing observation, something we could only get with Cluster."

Applying what we learn to other planets

Learning more about our own atmosphere can tell us much about our planetary neighbours – we could potentially apply such research to any astrophysical object with both an atmosphere and a magnetic field. We know that planetary atmospheres play an essential role in rendering a planet habitable or lifeless, but there remain many open questions.

Consider the diversity seen in the planets and moons of our Solar System, for example. In our small patch of the Universe we see extreme and opposite worlds: the smog-like carbon dioxide atmosphere of Venus, the much-depleted tenuous atmosphere of present-day Mars, the nitrogen-rich atmosphere of Saturn's moon Titan, the essentially airless Jovian moon Callisto, the oxygen-bearing atmosphere of Earth.

How do we know if these planets could support life, or whether they may once have done so? Mars, for example, is thought to have once had a thick, dense atmosphere that has been considerably stripped away over time. Although the Red Planet is unlikely to be habitable today, it may well have been so in the past.

"Understanding more about our own atmosphere will help us when it comes to other planets throughout the Universe," said Escoubet. "We need to know more. Why does Earth have an atmosphere that can support life, while other planets do not?"

Cluster is a unique mission; it comprises four spacecraft – a format that NASA recently used for their Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission, launched in 2015 – which allow continuous study of Earth's and the solar wind from multiple locations and orientations. Cluster has been operating since 2000, and in that time has compiled a wealth of information about our magnetic environment across various periods of solar and terrestrial activity.

"Additionally, Cluster's orbit is truly unique amongst all current missions; the fleet is on a polar orbit, meaning they can explore our planet's dynamic polar regions – specifically the cusps and polar caps – up close and in unprecedented detail," added Escoubet.

"Overall, long-term space missions like Cluster are helping us to understand a whole lot more about our planet, its , and atmospheric loss in general – which in turn will help us to understand the Solar System in which we live."

Explore further: Saturn and Enceladus produce the same amount of plasma

More information: S. H. Lee et al. A statistical study of plasmaspheric plumes and ionospheric outflows observed at the dayside magnetopause, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics (2016). DOI: 10.1002/2015JA021540

B. Zhang et al. The role of ionospheric Ooutflow in the generation of earthward propagating plasmoids, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics (2016). DOI: 10.1002/2015JA021667

Related Stories

Saturn and Enceladus produce the same amount of plasma

February 12, 2016

The first evidence that Saturn's upper atmosphere may, when buffeted by the solar wind, emit the same total amount of mass per second into its magnetosphere as its moon, Enceladus, has been found by UCL scientists working ...

Earth's magnetosphere behaves like a sieve

October 24, 2012

ESA's quartet of satellites studying Earth's magnetosphere, Cluster, has discovered that our protective magnetic bubble lets the solar wind in under a wider range of conditions than previously believed.

Hubble captures vivid auroras in Jupiter's atmosphere

June 30, 2016

Astronomers are using the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope to study auroras—stunning light shows in a planet's atmosphere—on the poles of the largest planet in the Solar System, Jupiter. This observation programme is supported ...

The solar wind breaks through the Earth's magnetic field

June 10, 2014

Space is not empty. A wind of charged particles blows outwards from the Sun, carrying a magnetic field with it. Sometimes this solar wind can break through the Earth's magnetic field. Researchers at the Swedish Institute ...

What's it like to see auroras on other planets?

November 10, 2015

Witnessing an aurora first-hand is a truly awe-inspiring experience. The natural beauty of the northern or southern lights captures the public imagination unlike any other aspect of space weather. But auroras aren't unique ...

Swept up in the solar wind

May 10, 2016

From our vantage point on the ground, the sun seems like a still ball of light, but in reality, it teems with activity. Eruptions called solar flares and coronal mass ejections explode in the sun's hot atmosphere, the corona, ...

Recommended for you

Neutron-star merger yields new puzzle for astrophysicists

January 18, 2018

The afterglow from the distant neutron-star merger detected last August has continued to brighten - much to the surprise of astrophysicists studying the aftermath of the massive collision that took place about 138 million ...

New technique for finding life on Mars

January 18, 2018

Researchers demonstrate for the first time the potential of existing technology to directly detect and characterize life on Mars and other planets. The study, published in Frontiers in Microbiology, used miniaturized scientific ...

North, east, south, west: The many faces of Abell 1758

January 18, 2018

Resembling a swarm of flickering fireflies, this beautiful galaxy cluster glows intensely in the dark cosmos, accompanied by the myriad bright lights of foreground stars and swirling spiral galaxies. A1758N is a sub-cluster ...

17 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rrrander
5 / 5 (6) Jul 09, 2016
Means that 22 billion years after the sun goes red giant and consumes the earth, the atmosphere will be depleted....
cantdrive85
1.3 / 5 (9) Jul 09, 2016
Well, as we know magnetic reconnection is pseudoscience. Any explanation that relies upon pseudoscience will result in pseudoscience. As such, the above is nothing more than nonsensical pseudoscience.
Da Schneib
4.6 / 5 (11) Jul 09, 2016
I'll point out that this looks very much like the same sort of phenomenon that creates plasma jets around compact massive objects like neutron stars and black holes. It's very slow since the Earth's mass, size, and magnetic field are weak compared to these massive compact objects, but it seems obvious that it's driven by the same sorts of processes.
Maggnus
4.6 / 5 (9) Jul 10, 2016
Well, as we know magnetic reconnection is pseudoscience. Any explanation that relies upon pseudoscience will result in pseudoscience. As such, the above is nothing more than nonsensical pseudoscience.
And, of course, the Acolyte must chime in, spouting his usual nonsense about things he does not understand supported only by the fantasies of a long dead fiction writer and a group of delusional electrical engineers.

A lunatic, a fake, a fraud, a liar, and all charlatans. Those describe his heroes. (Velikovski, Scott, Talbot, Thornhill, in that order).
cantdrive85
1.6 / 5 (7) Jul 10, 2016
However, our magnetosphere shield does have its weaknesses; at Earth's poles the field lines are open, like those of a standard bar magnet (these locations are named the polar cusps). Here, solar wind particles can head inwards towards Earth, filling up the magnetosphere with energetic particles.

This is nothing more than nonsensical pseudoscience lumped on top of the MR pseudoscience. There are no "open field lines" as claimed by these sorry excuses for scientists. The so called "open field lines" are the electric Birkeland currents which are directly connected to the Sun. The irony being that these electrical engineers who correctly apply EM Theory are frauds while those who rely on pseudoscience such as magnetic reconnection and "open field lines" are respectable scientists. Laughable!
And of course maggnuts relies on the typical ad hominem attacks due to her inability to discuss the real science involved.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (6) Jul 10, 2016
So, what's the probability that this affects the ozone layer at the poles and has been attributed to CFCs.
TechnoCreed
4.6 / 5 (9) Jul 10, 2016
So, what's the probability that this affects the ozone layer at the poles and has been attributed to CFCs.

Absolotely none... 0%. You will find most stratospheric ozone between 15 and 30 km of altitude; where the level of solar UV is favorable to its formation. The gas that is being lost in the described process, found its way in the plasmasphere (1000km above ground) and is monoatomic (at 150 km of altitude and above, most gas are monoatomic).
hangman04
5 / 5 (1) Jul 11, 2016
i like the title.
the curious case of......... benjamin button... :)
bschott
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 11, 2016
I'll point out that this looks very much like the same sort of phenomenon that creates plasma jets around compact massive objects like neutron stars and black holes. It's very slow since the Earth's mass, size, and magnetic field are weak compared to these massive compact objects, but it seems obvious that it's driven by the same sorts of processes.


Dear God....I agree. Good post.
outersphere
2.6 / 5 (5) Jul 11, 2016
The earth is traveling erratically through space and various magnetic domains at 740,000 miles/hour. Of course the would be some leakage.
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
4 / 5 (8) Jul 11, 2016
Well, as we know magnetic reconnection is pseudoscience.


"Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice presented as scientific, but which does not adhere to the scientific method.[Note 1][3] A field, practice, or body of knowledge can reasonably be called pseudoscientific when it is presented as consistent with the norms of scientific research, but it demonstrably fails to meet these norms.[4]

Pseudoscience is often characterized by the following: contradictory, exaggerated or unprovable claims; over-reliance on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts in the field; and absence of systematic practices when rationally developing theories."

[ https://en.wikipe...oscience ]

For an easy example, consider EU. It has failed to present peer reviewed work ("absence of systematic processes"), for starters.

[tbctd]
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
4 / 5 (8) Jul 11, 2016
[ctd]

Now compare with science:

"Magnetic reconnection is a physical process in highly conducting plasmas in which the magnetic topology is rearranged and magnetic energy is converted to kinetic energy, thermal energy, and particle acceleration."

"... the first direct observations of solar magnetic reconnection were gathered in 2012 (and released in 2013) by the High Resolution Coronal Imager.[12]"

"New measurements from the Cluster mission for the first time now can determine unambiguously the scale sizes of magnetic reconnection in the Earth's magnetosphere, both on the dayside magnetopause and in the magnetotail."

"The process of magnetic reconnection has been studied in detail by dedicated laboratory experiments ..."

[ https://en.wikipe...nnection ]

I.e. systematic publication *and* testing by direct observation.

Science. It works.
Scroofinator
4.3 / 5 (3) Jul 11, 2016
same sort of phenomenon that creates plasma jets around compact massive objects like neutron stars and black holes

I agree, but don't forget that the sun also has this phenomena as well, which is why the heliosphere is "peanut" shaped:
http://www.nasa.g...iosphere
Perhaps this is just a common theme amongst large active celestial bodies.
Captain Stumpy
4.1 / 5 (7) Jul 13, 2016
magnetic reconnection is pseudoscience
@cantthink
you keep stating magnetic reconnection doesn't exist, but here is 100,000 experimental tests proving you wrong and stupid all in one link
http://www.pppl.g...wn-earth

you do know PPPL has an education and outreach dept. to help yall learn, right?
http://www.pppl.g...nnection

this was done with plasma physicists, so where is your refute?

where is the evidence that magnetic reconnection doesn't exist?

where is your evidence period?

oh... right
ya aint got squat except your pseudoscience based religion of "eu"
jonesdave
4 / 5 (4) Jul 13, 2016
you do know PPPL has an education and outreach dept. to help yall learn, right?


Do they do courses for snake oil salesmen?
cantdrive85
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 13, 2016
you do know PPPL has an education and outreach dept. to help yall learn, right?


Do they do courses for snake oil salesmen?

Of course they do, they have entire labs full of them with their moving field lines and other such pseudoscience. Stupid question as usual.
gculpex
not rated yet Jul 13, 2016
you do know PPPL has an education and outreach dept. to help yall learn, right?


Do they do courses for snake oil salesmen?

Of course they do, they have entire labs full of them with their moving field lines and other such pseudoscience. Stupid question as usual.


there ARE no stupid questions only unanswered ones...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.