Life as we know it most likely arose via 'long, slow dance'

Life as we know it most likely arose via 'long, slow dance'
A schematic highlighting the possible evolutionary transitions in protein-coding genes underlying the prokaryote- to-eukaryote transition in light of the Lokiarchaeum genome. The putative archaeal host existed in a stable symbiotic relationship with one or more bacterial species, with the capacity for both gene and lipid exchange between species. The archaeal host, with a large complement of cytoskeletal genes and regulatory GTPases, was probably capable of complex shape regulation. The transition to compartmentalization and a eukaryotic cellular organization was facilitated by: (i) the ability to lipidate GTPases; (ii) the coupling of SNARE and longin domains; and (iii) the acquisition of dynamins and CopII-like coatamer proteins. Credit: Dey et al./Trends in Cell Biology 2016

The first eukaryote is thought to have arisen when simpler archaea and bacteria joined forces. But in an Opinion paper published June 16 in Trends in Cell Biology, researchers propose that new genomic evidence derived from a deep-sea vent on the ocean floor suggests that the molecular machinery essential to eukaryotic life was probably borrowed, little by little over time, from those simpler ancestors.

"We are beginning to think of eukaryotic origins as a slow process of growing intimacy—the result of a long, slow dance between kingdoms, and not a quick tryst, which is the way it is portrayed in textbooks," says Mukund Thattai of the National Centre for Biological Sciences in India.

The of plants, animals, and protists are markedly different from those of their single-celled, prokaryotic relatives, the archaea and bacteria. Eukaryotic cells are much larger and have considerably more internal complexity, including many internal membrane-bound compartments.

Although scientists generally agree that can trace their ancestry to a merger between archaea and bacteria, there's been considerable disagreement about what the first eukaryote and its immediate ancestors must have looked like. As Thattai and his colleagues Buzz Baum and Gautam Dey of University College London explain in their paper, that uncertainty has stemmed in large part from the lack of known intermediates that bridge the gap in size and complexity between prokaryotic precursors and eukaryotes. As a result, they say, the origin of the first eukaryotic cell has remained "one of the most enduring mysteries in modern biology."

That began to change last year with the discovery of DNA sequences for an organism that no one has ever actually seen living near a deep-sea vent on the . The genome of the archaeon known as Lokiarchaeum ('Loki' for short) contains more "eukaryotic signature proteins" (ESPs) than any other prokaryote. Importantly, among those ESPs are proteins (small Ras/Arf-type GTPases) critical for eukaryotes' ability to direct traffic amongst all those intercellular compartments.

The authors consider the available data to explore an essential question: what might the archaeal ancestor of all eukaryotes look like? "If we could turn back the clock and peer inside this cell, would its cellular organization have been like that of an archaeal cell or more eukaryote-like?" Dey says.

As the closest known archaeal relative of eukaryotes, Loki helps to answer that question. The researchers say that the ESPs found in Loki are unlikely to work in the same way they do in eukarytoes. That's because Loki doesn't appear to have enzymes required for ESP association with membranes or key building blocks of the membrane trafficking machinery.

"However," Baum says, "the genome can be seen as 'primed' for eukaryogenesis. With the acquisition of a number of key genes and lipids from a bacterial symbiont, it would be possible for Loki-type cells to evolve a primitive membrane trafficking machinery and compartmentalization."

The researchers predict that, when Loki is finally isolated or cultured, "it will look more like an archaeon than a proto-eukaryote and will not have internal compartments or a vesicle-trafficking network." But its morphology and/or cell cycle might have complexities more often associated with eukaryotes.

Baum and Dey say they now plan to explore the basic cell biology of the related archaea Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, first isolated from an acidic hot spring in Yellowstone National Park.

"We believe it will be very difficult to crack the mysteries of eukaryogenesis without first understanding the archaeal ," Dey says. "We are currently developing tools in the lab to study the cell cycle and cellular morphology of Sulfolobus at the single-cell level under the microscope. We would also love to catch a glimpse of Loki."


Explore further

Missing link in the evolution of complex cells discovered

More information: Trends in Cell Biology, Dey et al.: "On the archaeal origins of eukaryotes" http://www.cell.com/trends/cell-biology/fulltext/S0962-8924(16)30002-2 , DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.03.009
Provided by Cell Press
Citation: Life as we know it most likely arose via 'long, slow dance' (2016, June 16) retrieved 20 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-06-life-arose.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
52 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 16, 2016
An even "slower dance" than the one I envisioned, many failed attempts to engulf the mitochondrion ancestor, starting further back with a more archaea-like Loki-archaea. Yes, much more likely; I like this! Finding the Loki-archaea and surveying its traits, aside from its genes, would start test and narrow the field of possible pathways.

As a note, the suggested pathway makes the likelihood increase that other worlds have evolved eukaryote analogs, because there isn't a particular set of traits that connotes 'eukaryote like'. The Loki-archaea is 'eukaryote like', despite the deep divergence between them and extant eukaryotes.

On the other hand it becomes harder to understand why there are few intermediates. But of course, that is what was said before we found Loki-archaea - and now the even closer Thor-archaea (recent mass sequencing) - as well.

Jun 17, 2016
@ogg: We know of DNA sequences that are over 4 billion years old. The ribosome is universal, and the earliest split likely happened > 4,2 Ga ago, according to putative fossil finds showiing the split happened > 4.1 Ga, and of course molecular dating.

The ribosome has an active center that is conserved. And it has an unordered amino acid sequence that has no folds, which likely derives from a part of its mRNA that evolved before there were any genetic code. That is two RNA strands that derives from before proteins (genetic code).

So the proof of that it is not happening twice is phylogenetic, evolutionary shared ancestry. In fact, Theobald showed 2010 in Science that it is the best observed fact we have! (More likely than independent roots, with a factor > 10^2000 [!].)

How much? Enough to know these things, obviously. How much rocks do we have that are 4 billion years old? Not much, but the preserved grains (zircons) are enough to know that there was a habitable ocean.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more