Johnson Controls to spend $245M on N. America battery plants

June 13, 2016

Auto parts supplier Johnson Controls says it will sink $245 million into building automotive batteries to handle increasing demand for electrical devices in cars and trucks.

The Milwaukee company says the investment largely will be in the U.S. and will add jobs at multiple locations. But the company wouldn't reveal the expansion sites or how many jobs it will create because it's still working with local officials on the locations.

JCI also says it will invest over $780 million globally to increase manufacturing capacity for its Absorbent Glass Mat batteries.

Johnson Controls says cars now have 50 computers and 150 electrified devices such as navigation systems, heated seats and power windows and doors, increasing the need for electric power. Batteries also are needed for stop-start systems that halt at red lights and restart them when the driver wants to accelerate.

The company predicts the market for stop-start systems will jump from 25 million this year to 65 million by 2020 in North America, China and Europe as automakers try to comply with government fuel economy targets.

Last year, the made 146 million batteries across the globe. It recently announced a joint venture in China to build its fourth automotive plant.

Explore further: A123 bankruptcy financing gets final approval

Related Stories

A123 bankruptcy financing gets final approval

November 26, 2012

(AP)—A Delaware judge is giving final approval for Chinese auto-parts maker Wangxiang Group to provide $50 million in bankruptcy financing for battery maker A123 Systems.

Supercapacitors poised to help boost vehicle fuel efficiency

February 4, 2015

Unlike slow and steady batteries, supercapacitors gulp up energy rapidly and deliver it in fast, powerful jolts. A growing array of consumer products is benefiting from these energy-storage devices, reports Chemical & Engineering ...

Recommended for you

Can people learn to embrace risk?

March 18, 2019

Studies have shown women are more risk-averse than men, more likely to opt for the smaller sure thing than gamble on an all-or-nothing proposition, a trait experts say could help to explain the persistent wage gap between ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.