Gravitational waves found again: here's how they could whisper the universe's secrets

Gravitational waves found again: here's how they could whisper the universe's secrets
Credit: YouTube

The international team of physicists and astronomers responsible for the discovery of gravitational waves back in February has announced the detection of a second strong signal from the depths of space. It is further confirmation that gravitational waves both exist and tell us a whole new story about how the universe came to be the way it is.

In 1915 Albert Einstein put forward his general theory of relativity, making the bold step of equating gravity to distortions of time and space caused by the presence of mass. He and others went on to predict that accelerating masses would generate ripples of distortion, flowing out as gravitational waves, though it was thought these would be too weak to ever measure.

Like the first detection, this second fleeting signal came from two in a tight orbit – what's known as a binary black hole system. After spending many millions of years orbiting each other in ever decreasing circles, these black holes collided in a fraction of a second over a billion years ago.

They had total mass around three times smaller than in the first detection – roughly 22 times the mass of our sun – but once again the collision shook the structure of the universe so violently that we detected the waves of stretched and squeezed space and time as they passed through us at the speed of light on Boxing Day last year.

Even so, this did not produce the kind of clearly visible waveform that heralded the first detection. It only stood out strongly once processed by the software the team developed over many years to extract the maximum amount of science from our three gravitational wave detectors – the two that comprise Advanced LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory) in the US and Advanced Virgo in Italy.

Questions and possible answers

The existence of two black holes with such high masses came as a surprise to many astronomers at the time of the first announcement, since the formation routes for such black holes are unclear. It was in fact the first direct evidence that exist and can collide and merge.

The existence of massive black holes raises many questions: were they formed in the Big Bang or through the collapse of matter at a later date? Did they form from a pair of supermassive stars or did they join together by chance once the stars had become black holes? Are they related to the formation of the supermassive black holes that appear to exist in the cores of nearly all galaxies? And what are the implications for the collapse of matter into stars and galaxies and the formation of structure in the universe?

When it comes to answering questions such as these, the number of events we see is important. Everything we have seen to date was the result of the inaugural four-month run of Advanced LIGO – two spectacular deaths of binary black hole systems (and possibly also a third one, though the signal is not strong enough for us to say with certainty).

Gravitational waves found again: here's how they could whisper the universe's secrets
Black hole at the centre of a galaxy. Credit: Malll Themd

The tantalising implication is that we will see many more in future. This would let us see the full range of masses of binary black holes, and also how rapidly they spin and how their spin axes are aligned. These are crucial factors in determining how black holes are formed.

As if that wasn't enough, these signals give us something else. It's basic, but in astronomy it is a very highly prized number: the distance to their source. There are remarkably few reliable ways to measure the biggest distances in the universe and gravitational astronomy provides one that is entirely new. As the field advances and new telescopes become available, this could help us map the expansion of the universe and examine the elusive ideas of "dark matter" and "dark energy" that run through current cosmological theories.

When the Advanced LIGO detectors return to operation towards the end of the year it will be with even greater sensitivity and they will observe for longer, this time in conjunction with Advanced Virgo. As a result we can reasonably hope to see approximately ten further binary black hole signals by this time next year. By 2018 we predict that we will see many tens, maybe even hundreds of such signals, allowing us to study the population of these enigmatic sources more deeply.

The improved sensitivity and the third detector in Italy also open the door to even more exciting discoveries to come. We are hoping to observe gravitational waves from neutron stars. These are the remnants of lower-mass stars whose lower gravity prevented them from collapsing all the way to black holes. Unlike a black hole, a neutron star is a highly compressed ball of nuclear matter and its detailed structure is set by particle physics.

Gravitational waves found again: here's how they could whisper the universe's secrets
Northern leg of LIGO interferometer in Washington, US. Credit: Wikimedia

Observing either from single neutron stars or binary pairs would reveal the physics of matter under the most extreme conditions in the universe. Having three detectors working in conjunction will also mean that we can be more accurate about the position in the sky from which a wave is coming. That will help us to identify any signals from these sources seen by conventional telescopes – the flash from the collision or its aftermath. This will multiply the scientific return from both kinds of signals many times over, for example by giving us more insight into the structure of the universe.

Looking ahead a few years, we will have space-based gravitational wave observatories of the kind pioneered by the recent highly successful LISA Pathfinder Mission (which announced its own astonishing performance results earlier in June). This would allow us to see a new spectrum of sources at lower frequencies, but could also reveal these black hole binaries earlier in their lives, and allow us to follow them for years before they finally coalesce. In short, the spectacular results from this first short run of LIGO are just the beginning for gravitational astronomy.

Explore further

Black holes and measuring gravitational waves

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
The Conversation

Citation: Gravitational waves found again: here's how they could whisper the universe's secrets (2016, June 17) retrieved 16 July 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 17, 2016
Shouldn't the thing be almost constantly chirping - given the vastness of space (possibly infinite and growing) and the number of events taking place around us (I assume)?

Jun 17, 2016
Shouldn't the thing be almost constantly chirping - given the vastness of space (possibly infinite and growing) and the number of events taking place around us

It can only detect stuff in a very limited regime of events that cause gravitational waves. As they noted in the press conference: when we have enough detectors that can cover a wide range of events the they're expecting events on the order of once a day.

The 'vastness of space' means that -even though these events happen a lot if summed over the entirety of the observable universe- the average time between arrival is still significant.

Jun 18, 2016
The more likely pathway to form black holes starts with everyday physics of baryons, i.e. cloud collapse and stars.

Even if the later physics is exotic, and hopefully the ability to follow mergers for years [!] should help elucidate more of that. The 1st observation showed that astrophysicists can model near field gravity and event horizons of black holes. The 2nd showed that they can model spin physics of black holes, besides mass and charge one of their main characteristics, one or both of the black holes summed to 20 % of the permissible spin for a hole of their size.

I doubt they can extract charge out of these observations, unless future observations of neutron star mergers to black holes which should have a complement of EM observations can constrain it.

Exciting times, showing that black holes is not 'the end of physics', but the beginning of probing GR at high energies and hopefully small scales (since Hawking radiation at the event horizon is a constraint).

Jun 18, 2016
Hi torbjorn_b_g_larsson (and also Hannes Alfven and cantdrive if you're reading this). :)
...they can model spin physics of black holes, besides mass and charge one of their main characteristics,...
Mate, I don't want to get involved in a 'war' between you and them, but I HAVE to ask: How does your above statement reconcile with your denials of that very thing when Hannes Alfven and cantdrive say that our SUN has a CHARGE?

In your above statement you just allowed that a stellar-mass body/feature (ie, the black hole after stellar collapse) DOES have CHARGE.

Hence my curiosity: Do you have some SCIENTIFICALLY/LOGICALLY COGENT/CONSISTENT REASON/THEORY to explain the basis for your/other 'criticism' of Hannes Alfven and cantdrive on that point/claim? It would have to be very persuasive to cover the NON SEQUITUR of you/others ADMITTING to BHs having a charge whilst DENYING that our SUN can also have a charge?

I'm just impartially observing ALL sides' arguments. Cheers. :)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more