Your friends have more friends than you do

Your friends have more friends than you do
Credit: McGill University

No matter how smart and funny you think you are, those you follow on Twitter really do have a larger following than you. And the same holds true for Facebook. But there is no reason to feel badly about any of this, according to Naghmeh Momeni Taramsari, who is currently working on her PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at McGill University. According to her research, which was published earlier this spring in the journal PLOS ONE, it is all due to the inherently hierarchical nature of social media networks, where, in the social hierarchy of connections, people mostly either follow up or across; they rarely follow down.

"Most people tend to think that they are better than their when it comes to intelligence, memory, popularity, and other personal traits," says Taramsari. "However, a recent study by other researchers shows that this perception is false, at least in the context of . In reality, our friends really have more friends than we do, on average. Moreover, our friends are more active (post more material), and are more influential (their posts are viewed and passed on more often). This is known as the Generalized Friendship Paradox."

So the McGill researchers set out to discover to what extent the friendship paradox is present in the online social network Twitter, and how exactly it is reflected in the network structure (as in, who follows whom).

You may be less popular, but you're not alone

In case you are starting to feel discouraged about it, don't worry. After using new methods to measure user influence and the extent to which the Generalized Friendship Paradox exists in social networks, a research team has concluded that almost all users (up to 90 per cent of us) experience this paradox—-even those with relatively high levels of activity and influence.

That's because people at any level of activity and influence tend to follow others who are more active and influential than themselves, according to Prof. Michael Rabbat, who teaches in McGill's Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering and is the senior author on the paper.

"Social networks do not simply comprise a few ultra-popular people with tens of millions of followers, followed by the masses, and who themselves only follow a few others," says Rabbat. "Rather, Twitter is hierarchical in the following sense: those who have millions of connections mostly follow others with million connections. Those with thousands of connections mostly follow others with thousands or millions of connections. Those with a few connections follows others with few, thousands, or millions of connections. Apparently, it's just the way we're connected."

In the end, even online, it's because we all want to be friends with the popular kids.


Explore further

A social-network illusion that makes things appear more popular than they are

More information: Naghmeh Momeni et al, Qualities and Inequalities in Online Social Networks through the Lens of the Generalized Friendship Paradox, PLOS ONE (2016). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143633
Journal information: PLoS ONE

Provided by McGill University
Citation: Your friends have more friends than you do (2016, May 18) retrieved 19 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-05-friends.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
279 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 18, 2016
Hmm. I suppose this is a source of trepidation for those trying to derive a "voted-in" sense of self worth in a social networking world. I'm not sure exactly what "following" entails either. I can pretty much follow anyone if I've bookmarked their site.

I think my crowd of friends must be too old to care. None of us have Facebook pages or Twitter accounts. We grew up in an era where you learn to make plenty of friends. And most of us have enough hobbies to occupy several universes. I have hardly enough time in my day to peruse my favorite science sources.

For years I have been telling my relatives that my phones won't do texting. That leaves us with good old face-to-face (or voice-to-voice) communication. That's much more pleasing in a human sort of way.

I must confess. I have texted one person 3 times. No one else knows.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more