Crafting a sustainable future for humanity

April 1, 2016, Lancaster University

Global efforts to protect the planet will fail unless we take concepts like equality and wellbeing into account, according to a new paper published today in the journal Science

From flooding and crop failure to air quality and water pollution, governments around the globe are grappling with the challenge of shaping a for both people and nature.

"Our quest to achieve a healthy and sustainable environment utterly depends on understanding how human wellbeing is linked to the environment and impacted by our management of it", said Dr Phil Levin of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, who is the Principal Investiagtor on the project.  

The paper, led by Dr Christina Hicks of Lancaster University, argues that we need concrete engagement with key social concepts as well as science if we are to make fair and lasting changes to the environment. 

The authors, who also include social scientists from the University of Northumbria and the University of Washington, identify seven key social concepts, which are often marginalised in efforts to meet sustainability goals.

The concepts identified are: wellbeing; culture; values;  inequality;  justice;  power and agency (a sense of self-determination).  The authors argue that these concepts are critical to informing decision making and shaping policy to make it more fit for purpose

They suggest that, while these concepts are harder to quantify than GDP or carbon emissions, they can be measured. The paper highlights methods already being developed by academics and policy makers to quantify some of them, including well-being, self-determination, values and inequality.

Without these perspectives we risk going down a road which protects the planet but is incompatible with human wellbeing.

Dr Hicks said: "Human wellbeing is dependent on healthy ecosystems but short term pursuit of wellbeing may negatively affect those same ecosystems.

"For me it all comes down to creating a more fair world – we can act to protect our environment but sometimes those actions can increase inequality and that approach is not going to be sustainable in the long term.  For example we have created marine parks and terrestrial parks to protect nature and biodiversity and quite rightly so, but in doing that we have sometimes taken away people's livelihoods, moved people off their own land. People have suffered. Lasting sustainability will hinge on fair and just solutions."

The paper highlights the importance of social scientists working alongside environmental scientists and .

Co-author Dr Sarah Coulthard, from Northumbria University, said: "Social science is fundamental to unpacking how people interact with their environment, but often the complexities of that relationship and the languages in which it is expressed can become a barrier to how it is used by other sciences and policy."

Explore further: Project to explore how children use social media to promote mental wellbeing and seek health advice

More information: C. C. Hicks et al. Engage key social concepts for sustainability, Science (2016). DOI: 10.1126/science.aad4977

Related Stories

The art of being mentally healthy

January 11, 2016

Researchers at The University of Western Australia have found that engagement in the arts for enjoyment, entertainment or as a hobby, for two or more hours a week, is associated with good mental wellbeing.

Recommended for you

Paleontologists report world's biggest Tyrannosaurus rex

March 22, 2019

University of Alberta paleontologists have just reported the world's biggest Tyrannosaurus rex and the largest dinosaur skeleton ever found in Canada. The 13-metre-long T. rex, nicknamed "Scotty," lived in prehistoric Saskatchewan ...

NASA instruments image fireball over Bering Sea

March 22, 2019

On Dec. 18, 2018, a large "fireball—the term used for exceptionally bright meteors that are visible over a wide area—exploded about 16 miles (26 kilometers) above the Bering Sea. The explosion unleashed an estimated 173 ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
1 / 5 (3) Apr 01, 2016
If we do not do this, our people become more detached from their connections with their government and agencies. "Fairness" is very important, and is damaged by too many rich and super-rich who get special treatment, usually by the government they bought.
Squirrel
3 / 5 (2) Apr 01, 2016
I read this in Science this morning. Its the kind of thing I open the New York Times to read. I do not expect in Science. It has no content relevant of a specifically scientific nature being just platitudes and worthy good-feel observations that anyone could make. I read Science to read science not dressed up opinion pieces.
gkam
1 / 5 (3) Apr 01, 2016
"worthy good-feel observations"
----------------------------

Really?

It doesn't look like it made you feel very good.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.