$1M Turing Award winners advocate for encryption

March 1, 2016 by Bree Fowler
$1 million Turing Award winners advocate for encryption
This photo combination of images provided by Stanford University show Whitfield Diffie, left, and Martin Hellman. Diffie, a former chief security officer of Sun Microsystems, and Hellman, a professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Stanford University, have won the year's $1 million A.M. Turing Award, announced Tuesday, March 1, 2016, by the Association for Computing Machinery. (Rod Searcey, Linda A. Cicero/Courtesy of Stanford University via AP)

This year's $1 million A.M. Turing Award goes to a pair of cryptographers whose ideas helped make the Internet possible. Both men say giving governments control over encrypted communications puts everyone at risk.

Whitfield Diffie, a former chief security officer of Sun Microsystems, and Martin Hellman, a professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Stanford University, introduced the ideas of public-key cryptography and digital signatures back in 1976. The concepts now secure all kinds of data, from online communications and financial transactions to Internet-connected infrastructure like power plants.

The honor was announced Tuesday, the same day that FBI Director James Comey and Apple's top lawyer appealed to Congress for help as the government seeks to force the technology company to hack into a terrorist's iPhone.

Diffie, 71, and Hellman, 70, gained first-hand experience with issues of security and privacy as Stanford researchers in the 1970s.

Before their innovations, electronic communications mainly involved friends talking to friends, and governments tightly controlled encryption technology. The advent of public keys and digital certification enabled the private sector to make it possible for anyone to talk to anyone.

"What we did was reduce the need to know people before talking to them," Diffie told The Associated Press.

Their research did not make them popular with the government. The National Security Agency sought to contain their technology, an effort that became known as the first "crypto war."

Diffie sees the fight with Apple as just one small move in a much bigger government attempt to grab power.

"I think the people who will control the machines will control the world of the future," Diffie said. "Therefore, everyone today is jockeying for their position with those machines, and this is just one aspect of that."

Hellman told the AP that he sympathizes with efforts to investigate the attack, at least partly inspired by the Islamic State group, in which a couple killed 14 people before dying in a gun battle with police. But he said giving in to the FBI would unleash "huge" consequences.

"The problem isn't so much with this first request, it's the precedent that it would set and the avalanche of requests that would follow," Hellman says, adding that many would likely come from less democratic governments such as China, Russia and Saudi Arabia.

Hellman says he will sign onto one of the many "Friend of the Court" briefs backing Apple in the case. Tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, Facebook and Twitter have pledged to participate as well.

Difffie, for his part, co-authored a paper with other prominent cryptographers last year posing a host of tough questions the U.S. government should answer before it demands "back doors" for law enforcement.

Their award, from the Association for Computing Machinery and mostly funded by Google Inc., is named for British mathematician Alan Turing, and is one of the most prestigious prizes in computing. Past recipients have included Douglas Englebart, who developed the mouse and other computing technologies, and Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn, who developed the key communications protocol behind the Internet.

Hellman said it's nice to be recognized with the award, one of a handful he's received for his work in encryption over the years. He plans to use his $500,000 share to fund the publication of a book he's writing with his wife of nearly 49 years that looks at what goes into a successful marriage and how those same principles can be applied to creating a more peaceful and sustainable world.

"Holistic solutions are what we need to get past our narrow visions and get to something that works for everyone," he said.

Explore further: Google will back Apple in court against the FBI

Related Stories

US lawmakers call Apple, FBI to encryption hearing

February 25, 2016

US lawmakers Thursday called a hearing next week on encryption, saying they hope to craft "a solution" to the standoff between Apple and law enforcement over accessing locked devices.

Apple says expert panel should take up encryption issue

February 22, 2016

Apple said Monday it supports the idea of a panel of experts to consider access to encrypted devices if US authorities drop legal efforts to force it to help break into the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino attackers.

Google boss backs Apple in encryption battle with FBI

February 24, 2016

Google chief Sundar Pichai on Wednesday expressed his support for Apple in its standoff with the FBI over unlocking an iPhone as part of a terror probe, warning that creating so-called "backdoors" into encrypted communications ...

Recommended for you

Cryptocurrency rivals snap at Bitcoin's heels

January 14, 2018

Bitcoin may be the most famous cryptocurrency but, despite a dizzying rise, it's not the most lucrative one and far from alone in a universe that counts 1,400 rivals, and counting.

Top takeaways from Consumers Electronics Show

January 13, 2018

The 2018 Consumer Electronics Show, which concluded Friday in Las Vegas, drew some 4,000 exhibitors from dozens of countries and more than 170,000 attendees, showcased some of the latest from the technology world.

Finnish firm detects new Intel security flaw

January 12, 2018

A new security flaw has been found in Intel hardware which could enable hackers to access corporate laptops remotely, Finnish cybersecurity specialist F-Secure said on Friday.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (1) Mar 01, 2016
That's a surprise coming from two people who are so objective and have nothing to gain. :-)
You notice Trump said nothing about courts, lawyers etc. He said boycott Apple. What a silly idea, as if profits matter to APPLE. :-)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.