Research questions whether shark control programs work

February 9, 2016

New research from Deakin University has questioned the assumption that shark control programs designed to reduce the numbers of shark attacks on NSW and southern African beaches actually work.            

Associate Professor Laurie Laurenson led a team of marine science researchers who analysed 60 years of , shark population and human population data in South Africa and Australia, and found no relationship between in netted areas and the number of .

The research has been submitted for publication to a leading journal.

Associate Professor Laurenson, from Deakin University's Centre for Integrative Ecology within the School of Life and Environmental Sciences, said the researchers chose to speak publicly ahead of publication after he was approached by ABC's Four Corners while researching tonight's story probing the evidence of whether shark culling programs worked.

"Our research is the first of its kind, in that it statistically tests the hypothesis that there is a relationship between the size of and the number of attacks," Associate Professor Laurenson said.  

"We honestly expected that we would find that as the numbers of sharks declined there would be a reduction in the number of shark attacks. We simply could not demonstrate a statistically significant relationship."

Associate Professor Laurenson acknowledged his findings would be controversial as they are counter-intuitive.

"It makes sense, fewer sharks means fewer attacks.  It really should be this way, but we can't prove it to be true," he said.

Associate Professor Laurenson said that popular belief simply hadn't been tested until now.

"If better data becomes available and a similarly robust analysis can draw difference conclusions, then that is the nature of science and we are comfortable with that outcome. But until we are proved incorrect, we stand by the analysis," he said.

Explore further: Scientist warns against shark culling

Related Stories

Scientist warns against shark culling

August 18, 2015

A University of Queensland scientist has cautioned against culling sharks because the long term ecological impact cannot be predicted.

A factor in shark attack increase: More people in water

June 17, 2015

Federal wildlife protections are helping sharks rebound, but they aren't the sole reason for the uptick in encounters between sharks and humans. Expanding human populations and growing use of beaches are major factors too, ...

Humane strategy reduces shark attacks

August 4, 2014

A simple and humane technique may be an effective strategy to reduce human encounters with sharks without harming populations of threatened shark species.

Need for reliable data on sharks

September 15, 2015

It is a fact – there have been 25 shark attacks in the past eight months in Australia, compared with 23 in all of 2014. However, scientists dispute this nominal increase is cause for a shark cull in northern NSW.

Shark attack deaths down in 2014

February 12, 2015

Three people died worldwide from shark attacks last year, far below the average of 6.3 deaths per year over the past decade, according to the International Shark Attack File report released by the University of Florida today.

Recommended for you

New discovery challenges long-held evolutionary theory

October 19, 2017

Monash scientists involved in one of the world's longest evolution experiments have debunked an established theory with a study that provides a 'high-resolution' view of the molecular details of adaptation.

Gene editing in the brain gets a major upgrade

October 19, 2017

Genome editing technologies have revolutionized biomedical science, providing a fast and easy way to modify genes. However, the technique allowing scientists to carryout the most precise edits, doesn't work in cells that ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.