Losing the fight against antibiotic resistance

Pills. Credit: Public Domain

Tackling antibiotic resistance on only one front is a waste of time because resistant genes are freely crossing environmental, agricultural and clinical boundaries, new research has shown.

Analysis of historic soil archives dating back to 1923 has revealed a clear parallel between the appearance of antibiotic resistance in medicine and similar antibiotic resistant genes detected over time in agricultural soils treated with animal manure.

Collected in Denmark - where antibiotics were banned in agriculture from the 1990s for non-therapeutic use - the soil archives provide an 'antibiotic resistance timeline' that reflects resistant genes found in the environment and the evolution of the same types of antibiotic resistance in medicine.

Led by Newcastle University, UK, the study also showed that the repeated use of animal manure and antibiotic substitutes can increase the capacity of soil bacteria to mobilise, or ready themselves, and acquire resistance genes to new antibiotics.

Publishing their findings today in the academic journal Scientific Reports, the study's authors say the data highlights the importance of reducing antibiotic use across all sectors if we are to reduce global antibiotic resistance.

Lead author David Graham, Professor of Ecosystems Engineering at Newcastle University, said:

"The observed bridge between clinical and agricultural antibiotic resistance means we are not going to solve the resistance problem just by reducing the number of antibiotics we prescribe in our GP clinics.

"To reduce the global rise in resistance we need to reduce use and improve antibiotic stewardship across all sectors.

"If this is not done, antibiotic resistance from imprudent sectors will cross-contaminate the whole system and we will quickly find ourselves in a situation where our antibiotics are no longer effective."

Antibiotics have been used in medicine since the 1930s, saving millions of lives. Two decades later they were introduced into agricultural practices and Denmark was among the leaders in employing antibiotics to increase agricultural productivity and animal production.

However, a growing awareness of the antibiotic resistance crisis and continued debate over who and which activities are most responsible led to the EU calling for the use of antibiotics in non-therapeutic settings to be phased out and Denmark led the way.

The Askov Long-Term Experiment station in Denmark was originally set up in 1894 to study the role of versus inorganic fertilisers on soil fertility.

Analysing the samples, the team - involving experts from Newcastle University, the University of Strathclyde and Aarhus University - were able to measure the relative abundance of specific β-lactam antibiotic resistant genes, which can confer resistance to a class of antibiotics that are of considerable medical importance.

Prior to 1960, the team found low levels of the genes in both the manured soil and that treated with inorganic fertiliser. However, by the mid 1970's, levels of selected β-lactam genes started to increase in the manured soils, with levels peaking in the mid 1980's. No increase or change was detected in the soil treated with inorganic fertiliser.

"We chose these resistant genes because their appearance and rapid increase in hospitals from 1963 to 1989 is well-documented," explains Professor Graham.

"By comparing the two timelines, we saw the appearance of each specific gene in the soil samples was consistent with the evolution of similar types of resistance in medicine. So the question now is not which came first, clinical or environmental resistance, but what do we do about it?"

Following the ban on non-therapeutic antibiotic use in Danish agriculture, farmers substituted metals for antibiotics, such as copper, and levels of the key β-lactam genes in the manured soils declined rapidly, reaching pre-industrialisation levels by 2010.

However, at the same time the team measured a 10-fold rise in Class 1 Integrons. These are gene carrier and exchange molecules - transporters which allow bacteria to readily share genes, including .

These findings suggest the application of manure and antibiotic substitutes, such as copper, may be 'priming' the soils, readying them for increased resistance transmission in the future.

"Once antibiotics were banned, operators substituted them with copper which has natural antibiotic properties," explains Professor Graham.

"More research is needed but our findings suggest that by substituting for metals such as copper we may have increased the potential for resistance transmission.

"Unless we reduce use and improve stewardship across all sectors - environmental, clinical and agricultural - we don't stand a chance of reducing in the future."

Explore further

Scientists must reduce antibiotic use in experiments

More information: Appearance of β-lactam resistance genes in agricultural soils and clinical isolates over the 20th century. David W Graham, Charles W Knapp, Bent T Christensen, Seanin McCluskey and Jan Dolfing, Scientific Reports, 2016.
Journal information: Scientific Reports

Citation: Losing the fight against antibiotic resistance (2016, February 16) retrieved 18 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-02-antibiotic-resistance.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 17, 2016
The heaviest need for antibiotics is and has always been for poor people who live in the edge...and for various reasons are bottomless drains for money. The heaviest profit for the makers of antibiotics has always been agriculturists seeking increased rates of return from overdriven production models. "Grow them in a cage and feed them dope to keep them docile", feed them drugs to 'lower the illness to optimize production vs costs at some level of gratuitous non-therapeutic non-varying antibiotic dosing' = keep them well enough to drive them to unhealthy..for the animal or plant..high production levels to chase sales and profits.
Therein lies the fatal flaw in our human survival plans. Our greed trumps our needs as a species.

The solution, if there is one, is to regulate malefactors of great greed. Profiteers!! Ah but first the greedy will seek to corrupt its limiters; so hard strikes at the corrupt must come first. Society must protect the many by limiting the few.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more