Culture-shifting new initiative to make 'open science' a reality

January 13, 2016, Monash University
Culture-shifting new initiative to make 'open science' a reality

Renowned microbiologist Louis Pasteur famously declared that "knowledge belongs to humanity, and is the torch that illuminates the world". It is perhaps ironic, then, that the fruits of scientific research often remain in the dark. While science should be an open and transparent process, particularly in the information age where sharing processes are simple and efficient, this is often not the case.

A new paper featuring authors from numerous international universities including Monash University's Mr Daniel Newman, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, has proposed an initiative to encourage scientists to share their data, analysis scripts and materials freely with their peers. The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative (PRO) aims to incentivise the sharing of data through the of . Under the PRO, peer reviewers who have signed the declaration will only review authors who have shared their content, or provided an acceptable reason for restricting access to their work.

Sharing in science has always been plagued by commercial and time-related concerns, from the secret, coded notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci, to Sir Isaac Newton's accusations of "stolen" calculus research. However, Mr Newman said the concerns around are far outweighed by the benefits. Some researchers are deterred by the perceived time burden of sharing and its impact on publishing potential.

"It can feel like a burden at first, but there are many online tools to help with open science. Once I became familiar with these practices, these skills are simple to implement as a usual part of my analysis pipeline," Mr Newman said.

"I'm excited to get on board with this open science movement as much as possible early in my career. My most recently submitted paper will be fully accessible, including all related raw data, analysis scripts and paradigm code open source, so my results are reproducible." he added.

Lead researcher Dr Richard D Morey of Cardiff University said the key to enacting genuine change in current sharing practices is the collective action of reviewers.

"Although many researchers are excited about creating a more open scientific culture, evaluation of openness has not traditionally been part of the peer-review process," Dr Morey said. "The Initiative is all about telling reviewers 'Yes, we can do this.'" Reviewers who agree are encouraged to add their names to the PRO website. "The signatures are an important part of the Initiative, so that reviewers know they aren't acting alone."

Dr Morey and Mr Newman are pleased with scientific community's enthusiastic response to the PRO initiative, which has already received over 200 peer reviewer signatures.

The PRO paper has been published in the Royal Society Open Science journal.

Explore further: Open peer review could result in better quality of peer review


— The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: Incentivising Open Research Practices through Peer Review, Royal Society Open Science, rsos.royalsocietypublishing.or … /10.1098/rsos.150547

Related Stories

Open peer review could result in better quality of peer review

September 29, 2015

Whether or not a research article has been peer reviewed openly can seemingly make a difference to the quality of the peer review, according to research carried out by BioMed Central's Research Integrity Group and Frank Dudbridge ...

Nature journal to begin offering double-blind peer review

February 23, 2015

Well known and respected journal, Nature, will begin next month offering researchers who submit their work for peer review, the option of having it done via the double-blind method—whereby both submitters and reviewers ...

Online game aims to improve scientific peer review accuracy

November 9, 2011

Peer review of scientific research is an essential component of research publication, the awarding of grants, and academic promotion. Reviewers are often anonymous. However, a new study by researchers at the Johns Hopkins ...

Publisher retracts 64 articles for fake peer reviews

August 19, 2015

(—German based publishing company Springer has announced on its website that 64 articles published on ten of its journals are being retracted due to editorial staff finding evidence of fake email addresses for ...

Journal team adds reviewer pay to open-access model

January 18, 2015

A new open-access journal called Collabra plans to pay reviewers, and that's a twist in the world of scientific publishing. The reviewers get to exercise some options. They can keep the cash (generally a modest sum) or give ...

Recommended for you

Study sheds new light on ancient human-turkey relationship

January 17, 2018

For the first time, research has uncovered the origins of the earliest domestic turkeys in ancient Mexico. The study also suggests turkeys weren't only prized for their meat—with demand for the birds soaring with the Mayans ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.