Study shows animals with larger brains are best problem solvers

January 25, 2016, University of Wyoming
A spotted hyena investigates a puzzle box after an experimental trial that showed carnivore species with larger brains relative to their body size are better at solving problems. Credit: Sarah Benson-Amram

Why did some species, such as humans and dolphins, evolve large brains relative to the size of their bodies? Why did others, such as blue whales and hippos, evolve to have brains that, compared to their bodies, are relatively puny?

It has long been thought that with brains that are large relative to their body are more intelligent. Despite decades of research, the idea that relative brain size predicts cognitive abilities remains highly controversial, because there is still little experimental evidence to support it. However, a paper released today describes a massive experiment that supports the theory.

Sarah Benson-Amram, an assistant professor in the Department of Zoology and Physiology at the University of Wyoming, is the lead author on a new paper, titled "Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores." It shows that carnivore species with larger brains relative to their body size are better at solving a novel problem-solving task. The paper appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, one of the world's most prestigious scientific journals.

Other authors of the study include Kay Holekamp, a University Distinguished Professor at Michigan State University; Ben Dantzer, an assistant professor at the University of Michigan; Eli Swanson, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Minnesota; and Greg Stricker, also from Michigan State University.

The authors traveled around the country to nine different zoos and presented 140 animals from 39 different mammalian carnivore species with a novel problem-solving task. The study included polar bears, arctic foxes, tigers, river otters, wolves, spotted hyenas and some rare, exotic species such as binturongs, snow leopards and wolverines. Each animal was given 30 minutes to try to extract food from a closed metal box. To access the food, an animal had to slide a bolt latch, which would allow a door to open. The box was baited with the favorite food of the study animal, so red pandas received bamboo and got steak.

The main result is that species with larger brains relative to their body size were more successful than species with relatively smaller brains.

"This study offers a rare look at problem solving in carnivores, and the results provide important support for the claim that brain size reflects an animal's problem-solving abilities—and enhance our understanding of why larger brains evolved in some species," Benson-Amram says.

Dantzer explains that, "Overall, 35 percent of animals (49 individuals from 23 species) were successful in solving the problem. The bears were the most successful, solving the problem almost 70 percent of the time. Meerkats and mongooses were the least successful, with no individuals from their species solving the problem."

Interestingly, larger animals were less successful overall than smaller-bodied animals. The paper also reports that manual dexterity did not affect problem-solving success.

Video of some of the zoo animals trying to extract food from a closed metal box

In addition to examining the influence of on problem-solving abilities, the authors also asked whether species that live in larger average group sizes are more successful problem solvers.

Holekamp explains, "A hypothesis that has garnered much support in primate studies is 'the hypothesis,' which proposes that larger brains evolved to deal with challenges in the social domain. This hypothesis posits that intelligence evolved to enable animals to anticipate, respond to and, perhaps, even manipulate the actions of others in their social groups. If the social brain hypothesis is correct, then we would expect that species that live in larger social groups would be more intelligent. However, we did not find any support for the social brain hypothesis in this study. There was no indication that social group size influenced problem-solving abilities."

Explore further: Hyenas that think outside the box solve problems faster

More information: Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores, PNAS,

Related Stories

Shorebirds prefer a good body to a large brain

July 18, 2013

In many animal species, males and females differ in terms of their brain size. The most common explanation is that these differences stem from sexual selection. But predictions are not always certain. A team of researchers ...

An evolutionary heads-up—the brain size advantage

May 22, 2015

A larger brain brings better cognitive performance. And so it seems only logical that a larger brain would offer a higher survival potential. In the course of evolution, large brains should therefore win out over smaller ...

Recommended for you

After a reset, Сuriosity is operating normally

February 23, 2019

NASA's Curiosity rover is busy making new discoveries on Mars. The rover has been climbing Mount Sharp since 2014 and recently reached a clay region that may offer new clues about the ancient Martian environment's potential ...

Study: With Twitter, race of the messenger matters

February 23, 2019

When NFL player Colin Kaepernick took a knee during the national anthem to protest police brutality and racial injustice, the ensuing debate took traditional and social media by storm. University of Kansas researchers have ...

Researchers engineer a tougher fiber

February 22, 2019

North Carolina State University researchers have developed a fiber that combines the elasticity of rubber with the strength of a metal, resulting in a tougher material that could be incorporated into soft robotics, packaging ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (1) Jan 25, 2016
Explain crows....
5 / 5 (1) Jan 25, 2016
While the study is interesting it actually proves nothing. The study was very poorly designed and the test is not a test of intelligence at all. the test measures how the animal reacted to food in an enclosure that is not found in nature. The bears solved the problem 70 percent of the time and a human adult 100 percent of the time yet bears and humans are not that alike except we are both omnivores which requires a lot of different ways of acquiring food. Our brains are wired differently than pure carnivores. Monkey were not tested but I bet that most would solve the problem and you cannot claim a lot of monkey species are as intelligent as a bear or man. I bet all the failures were not omnivores . mongooses and Meerkats are not,most carnivores are not. Put some crows to the test and they would probably figure it out as would some parrots. .
not rated yet Jan 25, 2016
While the article mentions whales and dolphins plenty of evidence shows both are pretty intelligent at solving problems for food. The large whales all need that size for the food source they eat. The dolphins are the same for the fish food they eat, if you want to eat something you have to big enough to catch it in the quantity you need to live. The brain size has zero to do with that task.
3 / 5 (2) Jan 26, 2016
not rated yet Jan 26, 2016
Explain crows....

Well, crows are huge black birds more or less the size of a chicken and which have an uncanny aim with poop.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.