On the precision frontier: A new calculation holds promise for new physics

October 13, 2015 by Siv Schwink, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Artist's rendering of a rare B-meson "penguin" (decay process) showing the quark-level process. Credit: Daping Du, Syracuse University

A team of theoretical high-energy physicists in the Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations has published a new high-precision calculation that could significantly advance the indirect search for physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). The calculation applies to a particularly rare decay of the B meson (a subatomic particle), which is sometimes also called a "penguin decay" process.

After being produced in a collision, subatomic particles spontaneously decay into other particles, following one of many possible decay paths. Out of one billion B mesons detected in a collider, only about twenty decay through this particular process.

With the discovery of the Higgs boson, the last missing piece, the SM of particle physics now accounts for all known subatomic particles and correctly describes their interactions. It's a highly successful theory, in that its predictions have been verified consistently by experimental measurements. But scientists know that the SM doesn't tell the whole story, and researchers around the globe are eagerly searching for evidence of physics beyond the SM.

"We have reason to believe that there are yet undiscovered subatomic particles that are not part of the SM," explains Fermilab scientist Ruth Van De Water. "Generally, we expect them to be heavier than any subatomic particles we have found so far. The new particles would be part of a new theory that would look like the SM at low energies. Additionally, the new theory should account for the astrophysical observations of dark matter and dark energy. The particle nature of dark matter is a complete mystery."

University of Illinois physicist Aida El-Khadra adds, "Scientists are attacking this problem from several directions. Indirect searches focus on virtual effects that the conjectured new heavy particles may have on low-energy processes. Direct searches look for the production of new heavy particles in high-energy collisions. The interplay of both indirect and direct searches may ultimately provide us with enough pieces of the puzzle to make out the new underlying theory that would explain all of these phenomena."

Syracuse University physicist John "Jack" Laiho describes why "penguin decays" provide powerful probes of new physics: "In the observation of a rare decay, because contributions from the SM are relatively small, there is a good possibility that contributions from new virtual heavy particles may be significant. These would be observed as deviations from SM predictions. However, in order to know that such a deviation (if observed) is not just a statistical fluctuation, the difference must be conclusive—it must be at least five times larger than the experimental and theoretical uncertainties. So rare decays require high precision in both the experimental measurements and the theoretical calculations."

Artist's rendering of a rare B-meson decay process with depiction of the strong interaction corrections. Credit: Aida El-Khadra, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

B mesons belong to class of subatomic particles that are bound states of quarks and they feel the so-called strong interactions, also known by the colorful name Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Quarks are found inside protons and neutrons—which make up the atomic nucleus—as well as within other sub-atomic particles, such as pions and the aforementioned B mesons.

The new high-precision calculation employs lattice QCD to calculate the effects of the strong interaction on the process in question.

"Decay processes that involve bound states of quarks receive contributions from the strong interactions, which are very difficult to quantify, especially at low energies," explains Fermilab scientist Andreas Kronfeld. The only first-principles method for calculating with controlled errors the properties of containing quarks is lattice QCD, where the unwieldy integrals of QCD are cast into a form that makes it possible to calculate them numerically."

The project was started when Syracuse University researcher Daping Du was a postdoctoral fellow at Illinois with El-Khadra.

"Our calculation is clean," asserts Du. "We focused on a process for which lattice QCD methods yield small and completely quantified uncertainties."

"We have witnessed amazing progress in lattice QCD calculations in recent years," observes Enrico Lunghi, a non-lattice theorist at Indiana University, who joined the team for his expertise in rare decay phenomenology. "Lattice calculations have advanced to the point where they provide ab initio predictions of strong interaction effects with small and reliable uncertainties. This is how we are able to obtain a SM prediction of this process with better precision than previously possible."

The team's high precision lattice QCD calculation required large-scale computational resources.

"Fortunately, we were able to leverage supercomputing resources across the U.S. for this project," comments Indiana University physicist Steven Gottlieb. "In fact, this project is part of a larger effort by the Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations to produce precise theoretical calculations of the strong interaction effects for a range of important processes relevant to precision frontier experiments. We used allocations at Fermilab (provided by the USQCD Collaboration), at the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the National Institute for Computational Science, the Pittsburgh Supercomputer Center, the San Diego Supercomputer Center, and the Texas Advanced Computing Center. "

After completing the new calculation and prior to its publication in Physical Review Letters [115, 152002 (2015)] in the article entitled, " B→πℓℓ Form Factors for New Physics Searches from Lattice QCD", the LHCb experiment at CERN in Switzerland announced a new experimental measurement of the differential decay rate for this decay process.

Fermilab scientist Ran Zhou concludes, "The recent measurements are compatible with our SM predictions, with commensurate uncertainties from theory and experiment. This puts interesting constraints on possible new physics contributions which are very useful for building models of beyond the SM physics."

The team also recently completed another paper, "Phenomenology of semileptonic B meson decays with form factors from lattice QCD", in which they make additional predictions for related rare decays that have not yet been experimentally observed. Once observed, these decay processes likewise may play an important role in the quest to find the new fundamental theory that lies beyond the SM.

Explore further: New theory of stealth dark matter may explain universe's missing mass

More information: Jon A. Bailey et al. Form Factors for New Physics Searches from Lattice QCD , Physical Review Letters (2015). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.152002

Related Stories

A particle purely made of nuclear force

October 13, 2015

Scientists at TU Wien (Vienna) have calculated that the meson f0(1710) could be a very special particle – the long-sought-after glueball, a particle composed of pure force.

Recommended for you

How can you tell if a quantum memory is really quantum?

May 23, 2018

Quantum memories are devices that can store quantum information for a later time, which are usually implemented by storing and re-emitting photons with certain quantum states. But often it's difficult to tell whether a memory ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (6) Oct 13, 2015
Additionally, the new theory should account for the astrophysical observations of dark matter and dark energy. The particle nature of dark matter is a complete mystery."

We can call them "QUIPS" particles.

Quasi-Ubiquitous Interstellar Particle Suggestions

Quasi because they are always where DM theorists claim they need to be, but have never been detected inside the Milky Way.

See what I did there?

They're where the scientists want them to be to correct for "Error".
Hence "Suggestion".

1.8 / 5 (5) Oct 13, 2015
What is a Year?

The Planetary Clock contradiction says a Year could be a few seconds if you are moving or accelerating fast enough.

Maybe Dark Matter is a difference in reference frames....maybe we are so far from these other galaxies, and because they have non-local motion, the could be considered to be in another reference frame, and therefore time moves differently for them.

If that is the case, then these systems would not need as much gravity to hold themselves together....because more time is passing for them...the objects are actually moving in slower speeds, but if time is moving fast then they look like they are moving normal speeds...and then you can't figure out why they don't fly apart.

Apparently the Apostle Peter thought that time was relative.

Maybe the galaxies out there pass through time at different speeds...therefore their apparent rotation speed is biased by the speed they pass through time.
Uncle Ira
3.5 / 5 (8) Oct 13, 2015
Oh boy, here we go again.
1.8 / 5 (5) Oct 13, 2015
Aha....the correct theory of Relativity is in the Bible!


Psalm 90:4
3You turn man back into dust And say, "Return, O children of men." 4For a thousand years in Your sight Are like yesterday when it passes by, Or as a watch in the night. 5You have swept them away like a flood, they fall asleep; In the morning they are like grass which sprouts anew.…

2 Peter 3:8
But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.

This is actually not a very good translation, but you get the point.

"Island universes" indeed.

The meaning of the verse is that time doesn't matter because God is eternal.

but think about that.

A day in heaven is as a thousand years on Earth.

And simultaneously.

A thousand years on Earth is as a day in Heaven.

2 / 5 (4) Oct 13, 2015
Oh boy, here we go again.

Yes, Gilligan, I shall continue to throw out ideas, because the scientists don't throw out ideas, they hide in darkness and the status quo.

They will never learn what all of this stuff is anyway, they even have a theorem that says they can't learn it all, but with darkened minds they keep trying anyway.

Dark Matter
Dark Energy
Dark Flow

What next?
Dark Elves?

Ever consider the fact that maybe God doesn't want humans knowing everything?

5 / 5 (5) Oct 13, 2015
Oh boy, here we go again.

It never rains but it pours .
3 / 5 (2) Oct 14, 2015
If you model an electron and a proton as small loops of current as Ampere did, and consider a neutron as one loop within the other, This model alone will explain all measurements(and predictions) of the periodic table better than any other theory.

If you replace the loop with a spring(circular helix), in which the loops of the helix can only be added in multiples of one........ you get the quantum effect when you wind or relax the spring.

This energy confinement system is what you call mass.

This energy confinement system is the only thing in existence.

All phenomena comes from it. You know it as charge.
3 / 5 (2) Oct 14, 2015
"Yes, Gilligan, I shall continue to throw out ideas, because the scientists don't throw out ideas, they hide in darkness and the status quo."

Interesting. Saying scientists don't throw out ideas? You're right. They test them. They don't uselessly spam websites hoping something sticks.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.