LHCb experiment observes two new baryon particles never seen before

November 19, 2014
LHCb experiment observes two new baryon particles never seen before
The mass difference spectrum: the LHCb result shows strong evidence of the existence of two new particles the Xi_b'- (first peak) and Xi_b*- (second peak), with the very high-level confidence of 10 sigma. The black points are the signal sample and the hatched red histogram is a control sample. The blue curve represents a model including the two new particles, fitted to the data. Delta_m is the difference between the mass of the Xi_b0 pi- pair and the sum of the individual masses of the Xi_b0 and pi-. INSET: Detail of the Xi_b'- region plotted with a finer binning.

(Phys.org) —Today the collaboration for the LHCb experiment at CERN's Large Hadron Collider announced the discovery of two new particles in the baryon family. The particles, known as the Xi_b'- and Xi_b*-, were predicted to exist by the quark model but had never been seen before. A related particle, the Xi_b*0, was found by the CMS experiment at CERN in 2012. The LHCb collaboration submitted a paper reporting the finding to Physical Review Letters.

Like the well-known protons that the LHC accelerates, the new are baryons made from three quarks bound together by the strong force. The types of quarks are different, though: the new Xi_b particles both contain one beauty (b), one strange (s), and one down (d) quark. Thanks to the heavyweight b quarks, they are more than six times as massive as the proton. But the particles are more than just the sum of their parts: their mass also depends on how they are configured. Each of the quarks has an attribute called "spin". In the Xi_b'- state, the spins of the two lighter point in opposite directions, whereas in the Xi_b*- state they are aligned. This difference makes the Xi_b*- a little heavier.

"Nature was kind and gave us two particles for the price of one," said Matthew Charles of the CNRS's LPNHE laboratory at Paris VI University. "The Xi_b'- is very close in mass to the sum of its decay products: if it had been just a little lighter, we wouldn't have seen it at all using the decay signature that we were looking for."

"This is a very exciting result. Thanks to LHCb's excellent hadron identification, which is unique among the LHC experiments, we were able to separate a very clean and strong signal from the background," said Steven Blusk from Syracuse University in New York. "It demonstrates once again the sensitivity and how precise the LHCb detector is."

As well as the masses of these particles, the research team studied their relative production rates, their widths - a measure of how unstable they are - and other details of their decays. The results match up with predictions based on the theory of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD).

QCD is part of the Standard Model of particle physics, the theory that describes the of matter, how they interact and the forces between them. Testing QCD at high precision is a key to refine our understanding of quark dynamics, models of which are tremendously difficult to calculate.

A pink glow illuminates the inside of this model of the LHC beam pipe, which is used to train engineers and technicians at CERN. Credit: Guillaume Jeanneret/CERN

"If we want to find new physics beyond the Standard Model, we need first to have a sharp picture," said LHCb's physics coordinator Patrick Koppenburg from Nikhef Institute in Amsterdam. "Such high precision studies will help us to differentiate between Standard Model effects and anything new or unexpected in the future."

The measurements were made with the data taken at the LHC during 2011-2012. The LHC is currently being prepared - after its first long shutdown - to operate at higher energies and with more intense beams. It is scheduled to restart by spring 2015.

Explore further: First-time observation of photon polarization emitted in the weak decay of a bottom quark

More information: "Observation of two new Ξ−b baryon resonances." arXiv:1411.4849 [hep-ex]. arxiv.org/abs/1411.4849

Related Stories

Maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle after all

November 7, 2014

Last year CERN announced the finding of a new elementary particle, the Higgs particle. But maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle, maybe it just looks like it. And maybe it is not alone.

CERN's LHCb experiment takes precision physics to a new level

August 29, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Results presented by CERN1's LHCb experiment at the biennial Lepton-Photon conference in Mumbai, India on Saturday 27 August are becoming the most precise yet on particles called B mesons, which provide a ...

Quirky quark combination creates exotic new particle

April 10, 2014

Since the spectacular discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012, physicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the gigantic particle accelerator outside Geneva, have suffered a bit of a drought when it comes to finding new particles. ...

Recommended for you

Studying the quantum vacuum: Traffic jam in empty space

January 18, 2017

An important step towards a completely new experimental access to quantum physics has been made at University of Konstanz. The team of scientists headed by Professor Alfred Leitenstorfer has now shown how to manipulate the ...

Flexible ferroelectrics bring two material worlds together

January 17, 2017

Until recently, "flexible ferroelectrics" could have been thought of as the same type of oxymoronic phrase. However, thanks to a new discovery by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory in collaboration ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.5 / 5 (10) Nov 19, 2014
LOL The post-modern version of Turtles-all-the-way-down, "A quark! A quark for Muster Mark!"

One week until Lee Smolin's new book is released, and I have truly enjoyed Susskind as background while preparing to read it.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (4) Nov 19, 2014
Errr, these are "turtles all the way up." Six times the mass of the proton, in fact.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (4) Nov 19, 2014
Might want to read this too: http://phys.org/n...ork.html

Gee, looks like those computer models really actually work. And so does QCD. Who knew? /sarcasm
5 / 5 (1) Nov 20, 2014
'...the new Xi_b particles both contain one beauty (b), one strange (s), and one down (d) quark....'
@Da Schneib, sorry to bother you again but is the 'beauty' a new quark? My understanding was of 6 quarks;(u,d), (t,b), (c,s).
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (2) Nov 20, 2014
b is "beauty" or "bottom." You'll also see t called "truth" or "top."
5 / 5 (2) Nov 20, 2014
@Da Schneib, Ha, what would I do without you posts. Thanks
5 / 5 (2) Nov 20, 2014
Why do we not see similar "paired" particles for protons and neutrons ?
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (1) Nov 20, 2014
Good question.

It's because at those low energies, the spin pairings vs. anti-pairings don't make enough difference to change the mass of the particles. Thus, the partners are indistinguishable from the normal particle. Remember that the masses of the quarks make up only a very small fraction of the mass of a neutron or proton; but in particles that have these heavier quarks like s and c quarks, not to mention the b quark, the quarks make up a much larger fraction of the mass. The rest of the mass is in the gluons and in the energy of the quarks orbiting under the influence of the color force within the particles. In protons and neutrons, this overwhelmingly dominates; in heavier baryons, like the Xi (and there are other types of Xi, BTW, than just these two), the mass of the quarks is much larger.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.