TES satellite instrument gives new insight into water cycle

TES satellite instrument gives new insight into water cycle
A new study clarifies what happens to precipitation that falls on land. Credit: NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory

Research using NASA satellite measurements has given scientists a better understanding of what happens to rain and snow that falls on land—how much runs off into rivers, lakes and aquifers; how much plants use; and how much simply evaporates. Among the new findings: plants around the world use less water than previous studies had indicated, and most freshwater passes more rapidly through soil than previously thought, with less exposure to the nutrients and contaminants contained there.

Understanding how precipitation, , soil, groundwater and other fresh water interact is important for improving large-scale climate models and regional and local hydrology models.

Water that has taken different pathways through the water cycle—water released by plants during photosynthesis versus water evaporated from a lake, for example—contains different ratios of hydrogen and the hydrogen isotope deuterium. Researchers from the University of Utah, Salt Lake City; and Oregon State University, Corvallis, analyzed the two forms of hydrogen in as measured from space by the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) on NASA's Aura satellite, and also in global water samples. The researchers accounted for each different isotopic signature in a computer simulation, producing a narrow range of estimates of the amount of water released to the atmosphere by each pathway.

More than a quarter of the rain and snow that falls on continents runs off directly, ending up in the ocean. Of the water that does not run off, two-thirds is eventually released by plants during photosynthesis. The last third evaporates—mostly from plant leaves, with a few percent evaporating from bare ground or water.

"Some previous estimates suggested that more water was used by plants than we find here," said University of Utah hydrologist Stephen Good, first author of a paper on the research recently published in Science. Good said that means "either plants are less productive globally than we thought, or plants are more efficient at using than we assumed."

Good noted, "In a variety of models—from large-scale climate models to regional and local hydrology models—we try to simulate all these pathways, but we currently have difficulty measuring them individually. Our study presents a new approach for measuring the importance of these pathways and provides a new, improved estimate at the global scale."


Explore further

Where does water go when it doesn't flow?

More information: For more information on the study, see unews.utah.edu/news_releases/water-cycle/

To learn more about TES, see tes.jpl.nasa.gov/

Journal information: Science

Citation: TES satellite instrument gives new insight into water cycle (2015, September 4) retrieved 18 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-09-tes-satellite-instrument-insight.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
20 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 04, 2015
Despite the importance of the water cycle to our environment (and ultimately human civilization is not all life on Earth), it's amazing how little 'play' this story has gotten in the environmentally-centric press. Indeed, if it wasn't for phys.org, I doubt I'd ever even heard of it.

Maybe if the headline for this story included some sort of angle about climate change are global warming, that environmentalists would be all over themselves wanting to know more about this satellite data.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more