Ad-blocking on iPhones chips at website money model

September 19, 2015 by Glenn Chapman
A top iPhone ad-blocking application was pulled from the App Store by its creator, amid a surge in interest in new programs to t
A top iPhone ad-blocking application was pulled from the App Store by its creator, amid a surge in interest in new programs to thwart marketing messages

A top iPhone ad-blocking application was pulled from the App Store on Friday by its creator, amid a surge in interest in new programs to thwart marketing messages.

Programmer Marco Arment removed the Peace app after it spent more than a day as the most downloaded paid application at Apple's online shop.

"Achieving this much success with Peace just doesn't feel good, which I didn't anticipate," Arment said in a post at

"Ad blockers come with an important asterisk: while they do benefit a ton of people in major ways, they also hurt some, including many who don't deserve the hit."

The $2.99 app jumped to the top of the charts after the Wednesday release of updated iOS 9 Apple mobile operating software that allows the use of programs blocking ads from popping up while visiting websites using Safari web browser.

While blocking ads promised to make surfing the Internet from iPhones or iPads faster and rein in telecom data use, it also sabotages what has long been the main way websites make money while providing free content or services.

"Of course, ads pay for properties on the Web," said independent analyst Rob Enderle of Enderle Group.

"You are essentially fast-forwarding through the commercials the way people do with TV."

Sidestepping mobile ads

Skipping ads is not new, according to the analyst. Ad blockers have been options on desktop computers for some time, but the numbers of people who opt to turn them on have been low.

Meanwhile, mobile lifestyles involving smartphones or tablets have increasingly centered on using apps that sidestep web browsers all together.

Ad-blocking does not apply to apps, which are vetted by Apple before being allowed in the App Store and which allow for Apple to share in the revenue generated.

Advertisers could be even more drawn to Facebook, which has its own ad platform at the social network.

The mainstay of Google revenue continues to be online ads, but a good portion of that involves search page marketing posts that are not affected by ad-blocking applications, according to analysts.

"Doing anything like this that prevents Google from getting revenue is likely one of the unique pleasures for Apple," Enderle said.

A study last month found that software that blocks online ads is expected to cost websites some $21.8 billion globally in 2015, and could rise further with the new iOS system, but some analysts questioned the methodology of the report.

Could be good

A shift to blocking ads could have a silver lining, according to Enderle.

Publishers who have been forced to put their content online for free while search engines make money off ads could see the rebirth of subscription models through paid apps.

"So, this could be a good thing," Enderle said.

"It could also be that if you want to see content, you have to turn off the ad-blocker as part of the deal."

Arment expressed concern that Peace treated all the same in an approach that was too heavy-handed in a world where such decisions are not black-and-white.

"I still believe that ad blockers are necessary today, and I still think Ghostery is the best one, but I've learned over the last few crazy days that I don't feel good making one and being the arbiter of what's blocked," Arment said.

"Ad-blocking is a kind of war—a first-world, low-stakes, both-sides-are-fortunate-to-have-this-kind-of-problem war, but a war nonetheless, with damage hitting both sides."

And, citing Chinese classical text Tao Te Ching, he said it should be avoided when possible and entered into solemnly when unavoidable.

Explore further: Costs of ad blocking rise to nearly $22 bn

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (3) Sep 19, 2015
How much did the advertisers pay him off with? Hmmmmmm?
5 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2015
Agree Lex et als. When I do a search I am thoroughly annoyed to find the page offering a result yet another page of search listings. AND it seems that some subjects have become taboo. The past results I found for the cons of fetal cord blood collecting have disappeared replaced with the endlessly repeated 1) will be useful for your baby in the future (it isnt), 2) research using cord blood will cure autism (No, but possibly it causes autism).
1 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2015
There are some doors that should never be opened.
5 / 5 (2) Sep 19, 2015
"Cost 21.8 billion"

Is very different from

"Cut profit by 21.8 billion"
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 19, 2015
"it also sabotages what has long been the main way websites make money while providing free content or services."

Read more at:

Copied the above false statement right out of the article. It is false because the one downloading ads is paying for them via the bandwidth usage you pay for that is subtracted from the bandwidth limitation of your account.

Flash video ads are the worst offenders when it comes to using bandwidth allocation. So, "free content" is what the author says you get because of your willingness to tolerate ads. It isn't free if the advertisers are using bandwidth I'm paying for to shove their worthless ads in my face.
5 / 5 (2) Sep 20, 2015
Internet without adblock is just...ewww.
(And the company where I work at doesn't allow plugins for web browsers. The difference between that and home is like night and day)

Ads are no different than spam email. And I sure as hell am allowed to have spam filters in my inbox so I'm most definitely not going to turn off script/ad/cookie-blockers.

I'd much rather pay a fixed, monthly internet-usage fee that gets divided amongst the sites I visit that month than lay eyes on one more ad.
5 / 5 (1) Sep 20, 2015
Ads will evolve in response. Had you noticed that even at the ads are custom tailored to your previous internet searches? Advertising that blindingly casts a net is obsolete and people will block them once their threshold of tolerance is exceeded. This is a market natural reaction, and as such is a good thing.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.