Solar System formation don't mean a thing without that spin

August 18, 2015, Carnegie Institution for Science
These images show the central plane of a rotating disk orbiting a newly formed protostar (dark dot) formed in a three-dimensional model of the shock-triggered collapse of a molecular cloud of gas and dust. On the right you can see how the shock (outer edge) has injected fingers with motions that are responsible for producing the spin of the disk around the central protostar. Image is provided courtesy of Alan Boss. Credit: Alan Boss

New work from Carnegie's Alan Boss and Sandra Keiser provides surprising new details about the trigger that may have started the earliest phases of planet formation in our solar system. It is published by The Astrophysical Journal. For decades, it's been hypothesized that our Solar System's genesis was initiated by a shock wave from a supernova. According to this theory, the wall of pressure formed by a shock wave from the exploding star smacked into a cloud of dust and gas, causing it to collapse and contract into the core of a new proto-star—our Sun. This young Sun was surrounded by a rotating disk of dust and gas that eventually aggregated to form the planets of our Solar System.

Boss and Keiser have explored this theory of cloud collapse—as opposed to a previous theory of shock wave-caused cloud shredding—using advanced 2-D and 3-D modeling for several years and have published a series of papers supporting it.

A crucial aspect of this line of research is the distribution of certain products of the explosion, called short-lived radioisotopes. Isotopes are versions of elements that contain the same number of protons, but different number of neutrons. Specific isotopes were formed during the supernova's explosion and distributed throughout the region that would eventually become our Solar System, before the isotopes had a chance to undergo radioactive decay. Their daughter products can be found today in samples of primitive meteorites.

Previous modeling work from Boss and Keiser demonstrated that a wave of pressure expanding out from a supernova's explosion could have struck a gas cloud, and formed little finger-like indentations in the cloud's surface, which injected the short-lived radioisotopes into the collapsing ball of gas and dust that would eventually become our Sun and its planets.

The new modeling work from Boss and Keiser shows that this shock injection could have been responsible not only for the distribution of the isotopes now found in primitive meteorites, but also for the spin of our Solar System. The angular momentum of the shock fingers appears to be what allowed the disk of gas and dust to form around the Sun, instead of collapsing into it.

"This was a complete surprise to me," Boss said, "the very fact that a rotating disk formed around our proto-Sun may have been a result of the spin induced by this shock front. Without spin, the cloud disappears into the proto-Sun. With spin, a disk suitable for is created."

Explore further: Fingering the culprit that polluted the Solar System

Related Stories

Fingering the culprit that polluted the Solar System

August 2, 2012

(Phys.org) -- For decades it has been thought that a shock wave from a supernova explosion triggered the formation of our Solar System. According to this theory, the shock wave also injected material from the exploding star ...

Solar system's youth gives clues to planet search

July 24, 2013

Comets and meteorites contain clues to our solar system's earliest days. But some of the findings are puzzle pieces that don't seem to fit well together. A new set of theoretical models from Carnegie's Alan Boss shows how ...

Spiral arms cradle baby terrestrial planets

June 25, 2015

New work from Carnegie's Alan Boss offers a potential solution to a longstanding problem in the prevailing theory of how rocky planets formed in our own Solar System, as well as in others. The snag he's untangling: how dust ...

Modeling Jupiter and Saturn's possible origins

March 5, 2013

New theoretical modeling by Carnegie's Alan Boss provides clues to how the gas giant planets in our solar system—Jupiter and Saturn—might have formed and evolved. His work was published recently by the Astrophysical Journal.

Jupiter's movements made way for Earth

June 23, 2015

There's something about our solar system that appears to be unusual. For some reason, most of our bigger planets are far away from our host star, while closer in are smaller, rocky worlds, including Earth itself.

How are planets formed?

January 30, 2015

How did the Solar System's planets come to be? The leading theory is something known as the "protoplanet hypothesis", which essentially says that very small objects stuck to each other and grew bigger and bigger—big enough ...

Recommended for you

Semimetals are high conductors

March 18, 2019

Researchers in China and at UC Davis have measured high conductivity in very thin layers of niobium arsenide, a type of material called a Weyl semimetal. The material has about three times the conductivity of copper at room ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

FredJose
1 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2015
Well, at least the authors acknowledge that their work is simply highly theoretical.

For starters, one has to question the statement that a shockwave from a supernova initiated the spin in the cloud. There just is no physically observable evidence that the sun and the rest of the solar system is the result of a supernova.

Also notice that the supposed birth of the sun is highly dependent on the existence of this supernova shockwave - which of course begs the question - how did the first stars in the universe start their existence all by themselves, without any outside assistance?

Appealing to dark matter and dark energy might produce a theoretical solution to this conundrum but it does nothing to provide the observational evidence that is required to support that particular line of thought. The dark matter and energy can only be inferred and then assumed to exist - it's all a very abstract and non-concrete phenomenon which cannot be observed so how now, brown cow.
Da Schneib
not rated yet Aug 20, 2015
Nothing like a little consilience to tell you you're on the right track. Having the Solar System's spin emerge from this is pretty strongly indicative. I'm not sure there's another really good explanation for that out there.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.