Language analysis predicts a coming betrayal

August 20, 2015 by Bill Steele, Cornell University
Credit: George Hodan/public domain

Being betrayed is worse than just being attacked. Someone you trusted as a friend and ally suddenly stabs you in the back.

According to a team of researchers at Cornell, the University of Maryland and the University of Colorado, there are subtle linguistic clues that predict when a is coming. Humans are poor at noticing them, but computer analysis can detect them.

"Language does tell us a lot about human relations," said Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cornell assistant professor of information science. "Not with certainty, but signaling intentions. Language is a social signal we are trying to decode."

Analyzing messages in an online game has identified signals of coming betrayal, Cornell Vlad Niculae reported at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, held in conjunction with the seventh International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, July 26-31 in Beijing. Collaborators on the paper along with Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil are Jordan Boyd-Graber, assistant professor of at the University of Colorado, and Srijan Kumar, a graduate student in computer science at the University of Maryland.

The result is not a recipe for avoiding betrayal in romance and friendship, the researchers said. If it worked, they pointed out, betrayals could not happen. But it might offer ways to help groups work more effectively together, they said, for example in software development teams or online crowdsourcing projects like Wikipedia.

The game they studied was the online version of Diplomacy (also played as a board game), in which players assume the roles of European nations before World War I and try to conquer the entire map. In wars launched in the game, two or more countries will defeat a lone opponent, so players must form alliances to advance. Each round of play begins with a "diplomacy" discussion period for such negotiations. But since the ultimate goal is to rule alone, players inevitably will turn against their allies, an act gamers call "backstabbing" or just "stabbing." Parallels with the TV show "Survivor" come to mind.

The researchers analyzed a dataset of 145,000 messages between pairs of players in 249 online Diplomacy games. They matched pairs of players whose relationship ended in betrayal with similar pairs where it did not, and compared the language of the messages exchanged. Drawing sometimes on algorithms developed by previous researchers they looked for positive or negative sentiment, politeness and for keywords suggesting such concepts as planning ("next," "then"), claims ("I believe," "I think"), time ("still," "while") or comparison ("as much as," "after").

Among the most obvious findings were that betrayers become more positive and less polite just before a betrayal, and that the language patterns of betrayer and victim become less balanced at that time. Among others, victims used more planning words than their betrayers, further proof that victims were unaware of the coming treachery.

To carry their work forward, the researchers have created a new online game called StreetCrowd, where teams must work together to solve a problem. They hope to study the play to learn how to make group efforts more successful.

Explore further: Gamers who buy advantages are respected less by other players

Related Stories

Gamers who buy advantages are respected less by other players

August 5, 2015

How do gamers perceive other gamers that buy an in-game advantage using microtransactions (real money)? In studies with 532 active gamers as participants, psychologists from Tilburg University and UC Berkeley found that players ...

In longterm relationships, the brain makes trust a habit

September 3, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—After someone betrays you, do you continue to trust the betrayer? Your answer depends on the length of the relationship, according to research by sociologist Karen Cook of Stanford University and her colleagues. ...

US diplomacy goes virtual with youth video game

December 12, 2012

The United States expanded its e-diplomacy efforts Wednesday with the launch of a video game aimed at helping young people get a better understanding of American language and culture.

Recommended for you

Pushing lithium ion batteries to the next performance level

December 13, 2018

Conventional lithium ion batteries, such as those widely used in smartphones and notebooks, have reached performance limits. Materials chemist Freddy Kleitz from the Faculty of Chemistry of the University of Vienna and international ...

Uber filed paperwork for IPO: report

December 8, 2018

Ride-share company Uber quietly filed paperwork this week for its initial public offering, the Wall Street Journal reported late Friday.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 20, 2015
I played three handed cut-throat bridge in college (when we could not get a fourth player). Also played "Spades" there. Both of these are played like the Diplomacy game above. In these games, nobody "trusted" each other. Ganging up on another player was part of a larger strategy of using a partner's resources up faster than one's own. No betrayal was involved, just cut-throat alliances. Perhaps the authors of this study assume too much.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.