We are in the midst of a shark frenzy.
In recent weeks, there has been a spate of reported attacks on both coasts of the United States. The frenzy, however, appears to be more a product of our fears than an actual uptick in the risk of shark encounters, according to a new Stanford-led study.
The study, to be published later this month in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, finds that despite increasing records of shark attacks – mostly by white sharks – in California, the individual attack risk has dropped by more than 91 percent during the past six decades. Rather than cull sharks – which research shows has no effect on the risks of an encounter – resource managers should promote safe ocean-going behavior by providing information on how risk varies among locations and times, according to the study.
"Our results indicate that the seemingly conflicting goals of protecting large predators and people can be reconciled," said co-author Fiorenza Micheli, the David and Lucile Packard Professor of Marine Science at Stanford's Hopkins Marine Station and a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. "An awareness of risk – in places and times of the year – can greatly increase the safety of ocean users."
The researchers show that increasing reports of shark attacks are due to an increased human population and more ocean recreation. The decline in actual risk may be due to factors such as a drop in the white shark population off California's coast and a shift in white shark spatial distribution in response to growing populations of seals – a favorite prey.
Why large predators are good
Sharks play a vital role in marine ecosystems, and can benefit humans. For example, research has linked a drop in shark numbers to the collapse of a North Carolina bay scallops fishery due to an outbreak of scallop-eating rays normally controlled by sharks.
Likewise, research has shown that the loss of large predators like lions and leopards in sub-Saharan Africa has led to higher rates of intestinal parasite infections among baboons and humans who live in close proximity.
The study's results indicate that healthier ecosystems are safer when it comes to human-shark interaction. In California, for example, effective marine management leading to the recovery of elephant seals has concentrated sharks around seal colonies and away from human beachgoers.
Avoiding shark attacks
The chances of being bitten by a shark are slim, according to the California-focused study:
- Scuba divers are 6,897 times more likely to be hospitalized for diving-related decompression sickness than for white shark bites.
- Ocean-goers are 1,817 times more likely to drown than die from a shark attack.
- Scuba divers have a 1-in-136 million chance of being bitten.
- Surfers have a 1-in-17 million chance of being bitten.
The best way to avoid a shark encounter is to avoid locations and seasons where risk is highest, the study's authors advise. For example, the riskiest time and place for California surfers is October and November in Mendocino County. That risk can be reduced 25-fold if you surf in March, and more than 1,600-fold if you surf in March between San Diego and Los Angeles.
"The more we understand about shark ecology, behavior and distribution, the better able we are to create effective guidelines and help people make informed decisions," said lead author Francesco Ferretti, a postdoctoral scholar in biology at Stanford's Hopkins Marine Station. "Analyzing global shark bite statistics has no ecological cost and virtually no financial burden when compared to shark control programs. By contrast, ineffective cull programs can cost millions of dollars and deplete already endangered populations."
Explore further: A factor in shark attack increase: More people in water
"Reconciling predator conservation with public safety." Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, DOI: 10.1890/150109