Severe ozone depletion avoided

Severe ozone depletion avoided
Arctic ozone without the Montreal Protocol (left) and following its implementation (right) on 26 March 2011. Credit: Sandip Dhomse

We are already reaping the rewards of the Montreal Protocol, with the ozone layer in much better shape than it would have been without the UN treaty, according to a new study in Nature Communications.

Study lead author Professor Martyn Chipperfield, from the School of Earth & Environment at the University of Leeds, said: "Our research confirms the importance of the Montreal Protocol and shows that we have already had real benefits. We knew that it would save us from large ozone loss 'in the future', but in fact we are already past the point when things would have become noticeably worse."

Although the Montreal Protocol came into force in 1987 and restricted the use of ozone-depleting substances, atmospheric concentrations of these harmful substances continued to rise as they can survive in the atmosphere for many years. Concentrations peaked in 1993 and have subsequently declined.

In the new study, the researchers used a state-of-the-art 3D computer model of atmospheric chemistry to investigate what would have happened to the ozone layer if the Montreal Protocol had not been implemented.

Professor Chipperfield said: "Ozone depletion in the polar regions depends on meteorology, especially the occurrence of cold temperatures at about 20km altitude - colder temperatures cause more loss. Other studies which have assessed the importance of the Montreal Protocol have used models to predict atmospheric winds and temperatures and have looked a few decades into the future. The predictions of winds and temperatures in these models are uncertain, and probably underestimate the extent of cold winters.

"We have used actual observed meteorological conditions for the past few decades. This gives a more accurate simulation of the conditions for polar ozone loss."

The researchers suggest that the hole in the ozone layer over the Antarctic would have grown in size by an additional 40% by 2013. Their model also suggests that had ozone-depleting substances continued to increase, the ozone layer would have become significantly thinner over other parts of the globe.

Professor Chipperfield said he undertook this study because of the exceptionally cold Arctic winter of 2010/11.

"We could see that previous models used to predict the impact of the Montreal Protocol in the future would not have predicted such extreme events and we wondered how much worse things could have been if the Montreal Protocol had not been in place," he said.

Without the Montreal Protocol, the new study reveals that a very large ozone hole over the Arctic would have occurred during that cold winter and smaller Arctic ozone holes would have become a regular occurrence.

The Montreal Protocol has been strengthened over time through amendments and adjustments, supported by ongoing research. The researchers behind the new study say that scientists must continue to monitor the situation to ensure all potential threats to the are mitigated.


Explore further

Increase in ozone-destroying substances—but Montreal Protocol on track

More information: The research paper, 'Quantifying the Ozone and UV Benefits Already Achieved by the Montreal Protocol', is published in the journal Nature Communications on 26 May 2015: dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8233
Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Severe ozone depletion avoided (2015, May 26) retrieved 16 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-05-severe-ozone-depletion.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
67 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 26, 2015
Another pointless modeling exercise.

May 26, 2015
And duPont's bank account much more flush.

Fraud!

May 26, 2015
I am a proud DuPont retiree, and Chemical Engineer. In 1978 (Montreal Protocol), the DuPont company couldn't trump City Hall (Government) and hysterical uniformed public opinion ( chloro-carbons will kill us all). With the Freon@R patents due to expire in 1979, the DuPont Freon management of said: "Why fight City Hall ? Why fight Public Opinion (DuPont's customers) ? Let's make HFC-134a and cut out competitors. Of course, chlorine is the absolute, evil enemy, even though we depend upon chlorophyl. Every element in the Periodic Table is bad, bad, bad, evil, evil, evil. Go with the flow, if you want to stay in business.

May 26, 2015
Of course, chlorine is the absolute, evil enemy, even though we depend upon chlorophyl.


@RFC: There is no chlorine in chlorophyll (in spite of the similarity in names)...

May 27, 2015
If there had been an internet in 1987, those who deny global warming now would have been denying the existence of the ozone hole then. It is truly an example of how international co-operation can work.

And then we would have had Water Pffftttt claiming it was actually hydrogen - or some other equally ridiculous claptrap.

May 27, 2015
If there had been an internet in 1987, those who deny global warming now would have been denying the existence of the ozone hole then. It is truly an example of how international co-operation can work.

And then we would have had Water Pffftttt claiming it was actually hydrogen - or some other equally ridiculous claptrap.

The rant of someone with a hole in their head.
Read the first paragraph - http://www.thegua...ta-shows

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more