How many organisms do live in this aquatic habitat?

April 6, 2015
Mesocosm experiment that involves different numbers of common carp. Credit: Institute for Sustainable Sciences and Development, Hiroshima University

The aim of this new measurement method is to estimate the distribution of aquatic animals using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in order to quantify the number of target DNA copies present. This method focuses on quantification accuracy for low environmental DNA (eDNA) concentrations, because the eDNA recovered for target species from field samples typically occur in very low concentrations. This technique can be applied for habitat research on rare or non-native species in the field.

Evaluations of distribution and biomass are fundamental in studies on the population dynamics and community structure of an ecosystem. Recently, the eDNA method was developed to identify organisms in various aquatic ecosystems, such as lakes/ponds, rivers, and oceans. However, no quantitative eDNA technique has been fully established, because there are methodological limitations to quantifying eDNA concentrations.

ddPCR was used to ascertain the DNA concentrations and can detect differences as low as 1.25-fold, which is more accurate than the two-fold differences detected using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Thus, ddPCR more accurately quantifies eDNA concentration, enhancing the estimation capability of species abundance/biomass in eDNA surveys.

Dr. Hideyuki Doi from the Institute for Sustainable Sciences and Development at Hiroshima University compared the methodological advantages of ddPCR over those of conventional qPCR for eDNA quantification. Dr. Doi and his colleagues at Ryukoku University and Kobe University used eDNA from mesocosm experiments with different numbers of common carp to evaluate the quantification accuracy of qPCR and ddPCR when estimating species abundance and biomass.

Dr. Doi and his colleagues found that ddPCR quantified the concentration of carp eDNA relative to carp abundance and biomass more accurately than qPCR, especially at low eDNA concentrations. In addition, errors in the analysis were relatively lower with ddPCR than with qPCR.

Researchers sampling environmental DNA in the mesocosm. Credit: Institute for Sustainable Sciences and Development, Hiroshima University

"We showed that the relationship between carp abundance and eDNA concentration was higher than that between biomass and eDNA using both ddPCR and qPCR. Therefore, ddPCR can be used to quantify eDNA concentration in water. However, ddPCR is currently more expensive and time consuming compared to qPCR and in natural habitats, eDNA estimation for organism abundance is more complex. Therefore, by using multiple technologies, we can develop better eDNA methods to evaluate the distribution and abundance/biomass of species and communities" said Dr. Doi.

Explore further: Current tools for Asian Carp eDNA monitoring fall short, study shows

More information: The article "Use of Droplet Digital PCR for Estimation of Fish Abundance and Biomass in Environmental DNA Surveys" by Hideyuki Doi, Kimiko Uchii, Teruhiko Takahara, Saeko Matsuhashi, Hiroki Yamanaka, and Toshifumi Minamoto was published in PLOS ONE online on March 23, 2015.

Related Stories

Sampling rivers for genes rather than organisms

December 11, 2014

Effective environmental management depends on a detailed knowledge of the distribution of species. But taxonomists are in short supply, and some species can be difficult to identify, even for experts. Eawag, in collaboration ...

Recommended for you

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.