Saharan 'carpet of tools' is earliest known man-made landscape

March 11, 2015, University of Cambridge
A Levallois core, a distinctive type of Middle Stone Age stone tool, recovered on the surface of the Messak. Credit: Foley/Mirazón Lahr

A new intensive survey of the Messak Settafet escarpment, a massive outcrop of sandstone in the middle of the Saharan desert, has shown that stone tools occur "ubiquitously" across the entire landscape: averaging 75 artefacts per square metre, or 75 million per square kilometre.

Researchers say the vast 'carpet' of stone-age tools - extracted from and discarded onto the escarpment over hundreds of thousands of years - is the earliest known example of an entire landscape being modified by hominins: the group of creatures that include us and our ancestral species.

The Messak Settafet runs a total length of 350 km, with an average width of 60 km. Parts of the landscape are 'anthropogenic', or man-made, through build-up of tools over hundreds of thousands of years.

The research team have used this and other studies to attempt to estimate the volume of stone tools discarded over the last one million years of on the African continent alone. They say that it is the equivalent of more than one Great Pyramid of Giza per square kilometre of the entire continent (2.1 x 1014 cubic metres of rock).

"The Messak sandstone, now in the middle of the vast sand seas of Libya, would have been a high quality rock for hominins to fracture - the landscape is in effect a carpet of stone tools, most probably made in the Middle and Upper Pleistocene," said Dr Robert Foley, from the Leverhulme Centre for Evolutionary Studies at the University of Cambridge, who conducted the research with colleague Dr Marta Mirazón Lahr.

"The term 'anthropocene' is now used to denote the point at which humans began to have a significant effect on the environment," said Mirazón Lahr. "The critical time may well be the beginning of the industrial revolution about 200 years ago. Some talk of an 'early anthropocene' about 10,000 years ago when forests began being cleared for agriculture.

"Making stone tools, however, dates back more than two million years, and little research has been done on the impact of this activity. The Messak Settafet is the earliest demonstrated example of the scars of human activity across an entire landscape; the effects of our technology on the environment may be considerably older than previously thought," Mirazón Lahr said. The study is published today in the journal PLOS ONE.

The carpet of lithics -- a view across a valley in the Messak landscape. Credit: Foley/Mirazón Lahr

The survey, conducted in 2011, involved randomly selecting plots of one metre squared across the parts of the plateau surface. In each square, the researchers sifted through all the stones to identify the number that showed evidence of modification through hominin activity - evidence such as a 'bulb of percussion': a bulge or curved dent on the surface of a stone tool produced by the angular blows of hominin percussion. The average number of artefacts across all sample squares was 75.

At the simple end, large flakes of stone would have been opportunistically hacked from boulders to be used for cutting or as weapons. At the more sophisticated level, researchers found evidence that specific tools had been used to wedge into the stone in order split it.

"It is clear from the scale of activity how important were, and shows that African hominins were strongly technologically dependent," said Foley. "Landscapes such as these must have been magnets for hominin populations, either for 'stone foraging trips' or residential occupation."

The researchers say that if - as seems likely - the success of Stone Age communities depended significantly on tool technology, there would be enormous advantage to knowing, remembering and indeed controlling access to areas with a "super-abundance" of raw materials, such as the Messak Settafet.

"Hominins may well have become tethered to these areas, unable to stray too far if survival depended on access to the raw materials for tools, and forced to make other adaptations subservient to that need," said Mirazón Lahr.

One way that the environmental impact of hominin tool excavation may have been positive for later humans is through the clusters of small quarrying pits dotted across the landscape (ranging up to 2 metres in diameter, and 50 centimetres in depth).

Prof. Robert Foley recording lithic density on the Messak. Credit: Foley/Mirazón Lahr

These pits would have retained moisture - with surface water still visible today after rains - and the small pools would have attracted game. In many of these pits, the team found 'trapping stones': large stones used for traps and ties for game and/or cattle during the last 10,000 years.

By combining their data with previous extensive surveys carried out across Africa, the researchers attempted to estimate roughly how much stone had been used as tools and discarded during human evolution.

Although stone tool manufacture dates back at least 2.5 million years, the researchers limited the estimate to one million years. Based on their and others research, they standardised population density (based on extant hunter-gatherers), tool volume, the number of tools used by one person in a year and the amount of resulting debris per tool.

They estimate an average density of between 0.5 and 5 million stone artefacts per square kilometre of Africa. When converted into an estimate of volume, this is the equivalent of between 42 to 84 million Great Pyramids of Giza.

Researchers say this would be the equivalent of finding between 1.3 and 2.7 Great Pyramids per square kilometre throughout Africa.

Explore further: World's oldest butchering tools gave evolutionary edge to human communication

More information: Early human impact from stone tool production on the Central Saharan landscape, PLOS ONE, 2015.

Related Stories

Non-dominant hand vital to the evolution of the thumb

September 10, 2014

New research from biological anthropologists at the University of Kent has shown that the use of the non-dominant hand was likely to have played a vital role in the evolution of modern human hand morphology.

Beachcombing for early humans in Africa

June 3, 2013

(Phys.org) —From the earliest modern humans to the present day, our species has evolved dramatically in both biological and behavioural terms. What forces prompted these momentous changes?

Recommended for you

Sensual fresco discovered in ancient Pompeii bedroom

November 19, 2018

Archaeologists have found a fresco in an ancient Pompeii bedroom that depicts a sensual scene of the Roman god Jupiter, disguised as a swan, and a legendary queen of Sparta from Greek mythology.

Excavators find tombs buried in Bolivia 500 years ago

November 17, 2018

Archaeologists say they found tombs at a Bolivian quarry containing remains from more than 500 years ago that give an insight into the interaction of various peoples with the expanding Inca empire.

Preventing chemical weapons as sciences converge

November 15, 2018

Alarming examples of the dangers from chemical weapons have been seen recently in the use of industrial chemicals and the nerve agent sarin against civilians in Syria, and in the targeted assassination operations using VX ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jay_robbins
1.6 / 5 (7) Mar 12, 2015
A billion rocks in the desert and you find some pieces of chipped flint and now some how that makes them man made. Let me guess,,,, your the same people that are seeing thing on Mars too aren't you?
Caliban
4 / 5 (4) Mar 12, 2015
A billion rocks in the desert and you find some pieces of chipped flint and now some how that makes them man made. Let me guess,,,, your the same people that are seeing thing on Mars too aren't you?


Sorry to crush your bird, but if you look carefully at the sample artefact pictured above the article, you will see that it is not shaped in a way that is found to arise from purely natural forces such as mechanical or chemical weathering, or as a result of being transported by fast or slow water, falling from a height, or being crushed like your bird.

The sample we may take as typical of the handiwork of our ancestors, from the clearly defined percussion bulb where a flake was struck off of the stone(forming an easily gripped surface), to the evenly-worked outer rim, which hasclearly and visibly had flakes struck from it along the entire outer edge of the piece, to a pretty uniform thickness and very sharp cutting/scraping edge.

When are you leaving for Mars?
B_Martin
1 / 5 (1) Mar 12, 2015
The UK has a similar mountain of prehistoric artifacts, except this mountain contains figurative artworks as well as tools. The artworks date to at least 100kbp, by species content (gorilla, elephant, both interglacial period creatures) Can anyone find me a real Scientist who is willing to investigate? eoliths.blogspot.co.uk

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.