Ryegrass screening method aids farmers

March 23, 2015 by Aaron Bryans, Science Network WA
Despite the new risk rating method classifying some pastures as ‘low risk’, the rating is based on an average and as a result some pastures may have small areas that are of high toxicity. Credit: Peter Heilmann

A recently developed risk rating system will aid farmers in determining ryegrass toxicity within their hay paddocks or bales of hay.

Annual ryegrass toxicity (ARGT) is a serious issue for seeking to export hay domestically and internationally and an even bigger concern for those feeding their with potentially toxic fodder.

However, a recent Department of Agriculture and Food WA study has helped construct a method of explaining the risk of ARGT to farmers seeking fodder testing.

"People who buy or sell fodder for animals can have it tested at the Animal Health Laboratories of the Department of Agriculture & Food, WA for a fairly low reasonable fee to assess the risk that it might present of causing annual ryegrass toxicity in the animals that they feed it to," DAFWA scientist Anne Masters says.

"Because of the way that we have now organised the results we can give them a risk rating for the results of their test rather than just a number of bacterial galls per kilogram and that's easier for them to interpret."

The risk rating system will provide easily understandable results to farmers within 48 hours.

"The hay exporters collect the hay one day, soak it overnight, take the extracts early the next morning and bring it to us," Ms Masters says.

"We test it the same day so they get a result by late afternoon."

Low risk but still a danger

Despite the new risk rating method classifying some pastures as 'low risk', the rating is based on an average and as a result some pastures may have small areas that are of high toxicity.

"Quite often in a paddock you might have a patch which has a lot of ryegrass and that's where the toxicity is," senior veterinary parasitologist Dieter Palmer says.

"Animals quite like ryegrass so they may preferably go to into that corner.

"Although you could have a low risk paddock on average, that part of the paddock could be high risk."

Because of this, it is recommended that farmers who collect samples of their pasture to send away for testing take hay from multiple areas in the paddock.

"If [a farmer] has the bacteria in his paddock it could be quite unevenly distributed so the farmer has to collect samples of from all over the paddock and bundle them into one and send it to us for testing," Ms Masters says.

Explore further: Farm fodder project relies on feedback from 'smart' sheep

More information: "A semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Rathayibacter toxicus, the bacterium involved in annual ryegrass toxicity, to assist in risk assessment of fodder for domestic use." Crop and Pasture Science 65(12) 1329-1334 dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP14052

Related Stories

Worst weed the culprit of herbicide resistance

October 18, 2010

Scientists at the University of Adelaide's Waite Research Institute have discovered new cases of herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass, the most serious and costly weed of Australian cropping.

Undesirable weather slows down hay production

June 25, 2009

Spring weather has been less than favorable for harvesting hay, keeping many Indiana hay producers out of their fields, said Keith Johnson, Purdue Extension forage specialist.

Recommended for you

When more women make decisions, the environment wins

March 21, 2019

When more women are involved in group decisions about land management, the group conserves more—particularly when offered financial incentives to do so, according to a new University of Colorado Boulder study published ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.