Migrating 'supraglacial' lakes could trigger future Greenland ice loss

Migrating 'supraglacial' lakes could trigger future Greenland ice loss
Supraglacial lakes on the Greenland ice sheet can be seen as dark blue specks in the center and to the right of this satellite image. Credit: USGS/NASA Landsat

Predictions of Greenland ice loss and its impact on rising sea levels may have been greatly underestimated, according to scientists at the University of Leeds.

The finding follows a new study, which is published today in Nature Climate Change, in which the future distribution of lakes that form on the surface from melted snow and ice - called supraglacial lakes - have been simulated for the first time.

Previously, the impact of supraglacial lakes on Greenland ice loss had been assumed to be small, but the new research has shown that they will migrate farther inland over the next half century, potentially altering the ice sheet flow in dramatic ways.

Dr Amber Leeson from the School of Earth and Environment and a member of the Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling (CPOM) team, who led the study, said: "Supraglacial lakes can increase the speed at which the ice sheet melts and flows, and our research shows that by 2060 the area of Greenland covered by them will double."

Supraglacial lakes are darker than ice, so they absorb more of the Sun's heat, which leads to increased melting. When the lakes reach a critical size, they drain through ice fractures, allowing water to reach the ice sheet base which causes it to slide more quickly into the oceans. These changes can also trigger further melting.

Dr Leeson explained: "When you pour pancake batter into a pan, if it rushes quickly to the edges of the pan, you end up with a thin pancake. It's similar to what happens with ice sheets: the faster it flows, the thinner it will be.

Migrating 'supraglacial' lakes could trigger future Greenland ice loss
Credit: Amber Leeson

"When the ice sheet is thinner, it is at a slightly lower elevation and at the mercy of warmer air temperatures than it would have been if it were thicker, increasing the size of the melt zone around the edge of the ice sheet."

Until now, supraglacial lakes have formed at low elevations around the coastline of Greenland, in a band that is roughly 100 km wide. At higher elevations, today's climate is just too cold for lakes to form.

In the study, the scientists used observations of the ice sheet from the Environmental Remote Sensing satellites operated by the European Space Agency and estimates of future ice melting drawn from a climate model to drive simulations of how meltwater will flow and pool on the ice surface to form supraglacial lakes.

Since the 1970s, the band in which supraglacial lakes can form on Greenland has crept 56km further inland. From the results of the new study, the researchers predict that, as Arctic temperatures rise, supraglacial lakes will spread much farther inland - up to 110 km by 2060 - doubling the area of Greenland that they cover today.

Dr Leeson said: "The location of these new lakes is important; they will be far enough inland so that water leaking from them will not drain into the oceans as effectively as it does from today's lakes that are near to the coastline and connected to a network of drainage channels."

"In contrast, water draining from lakes farther inland could lubricate the ice more effectively, causing it to speed up."

Ice losses from Greenland had been expected to contribute 22cm to global sea-level rise by 2100. However, the models used to make this projection did not account for changes in the distribution of supraglacial lakes, which Dr Leeson's study reveals will be considerable.

If new lakes trigger further increases in ice melting and flow, then Greenland's future ice losses and its contribution to global sea-level rise have been underestimated.

The Director of CPOM, Professor Andrew Shepherd, who is also from the School of Earth and Environment at the University of Leeds and is a co-author of the study, said: "Because ice losses from Greenland are a key signal of global climate change, it's important that we consider all factors that could affect the rate at which it will lose ice as climate warms.

"Our findings will help to improve the next generation of ice sheet models, so that we can have greater confidence in projections of future sea-level rise. In the meantime, we will continue to monitor changes in the losses using satellite measurements."

Explore further

Lakes discovered beneath Greenland ice sheet

More information: Supraglacial lakes on the Greenland ice sheet advance inland under warming climate , Nature Climate Change, DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2463
Journal information: Nature Climate Change

Citation: Migrating 'supraglacial' lakes could trigger future Greenland ice loss (2014, December 15) retrieved 17 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2014-12-migrating-supraglacial-lakes-trigger-future.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 15, 2014
Greenland had been losing 200,000,000,000 tons of ice mass each year. Is it more now?

Dec 15, 2014
The Thermohaline Conveyor.

I had given up on bringing up a subject so complex to conservatives.

Dec 15, 2014
I hate to ask, but is it actually losing more, or is it just being replaced at a slower rate? If there were more water vapor available in the colder months, would it still be shrinking? I only ask because the land has been drying out for a long, long time, and the seas rising.

Dec 16, 2014
Greenland losing weight rising as a consequence with the rate accelerating:-

Even back in 2010 a whole 4 years ago !

European Alps also rising !

Even on our own phys.org site here some 4 years back:-

Dec 16, 2014
BrassOrchid did ask
I hate to ask, but is it actually losing more, or is it just being replaced at a slower rate?
The overall indicator is the integrated loss of mass, evidence is the fact the whole island of Greenland is rising... See my last post, sorry couldn't edit it some glitch :-/

BrassOrchid added
If there were more water vapor available in the colder months, would it still be shrinking?
Well yes, that's an important negative feedback effect but, its overwhelmed by far more ice melt, the rate of some 3cm is HUGE to say the least, especially when you relate the fact melting ice absorbs ~150 more heat than ice alone !

If we accept that the 400 trillion tonnes of melting ice absorbed 330 units of heat vs that of say water at 4 units of heat then the crucial question to ask is "What would the temperature of same mass water be if it started at 0 C were it exposed to the SAME heat ?"

The maths is simple & irrefutable but, the result is intimidating !

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more