Low error-rate detector system for telecommunications

Low error-rate detector system for telecommunications

NIST scientists have devised an experimental photon-detection system for communications with error rates far below even the most ideal conventional designs.

Telecomm networks need to move trillions of bits per second in the form of sent over fiber-optic lines, with information encoded in increasingly complex states of the pulses. Ensuring transmission fidelity in those conditions will demand ever-lower detector error rates. But even state-of-the-art receivers are approaching their design sensitivity limits.

The system developed in PML's Quantum Optics Group and reported in Nature Photonics combines two major innovations: adaptive measuring, which successively samples the incoming signal in comparison an adjustable reference beam which is optimized with each sample; and photon-number resolving (PNR) detectors, which allow more accurate noise reduction and state discrimination.

The system's error probability for pulses of about 20 photons is 25 times lower than even the best possible conventional receivers, with better performance likely as photon numbers increase. In practical use, it could lead to lower energy consumption, longer network links without signal-boosters, and higher-capacity links.

More information: "Photon number resolution enables quantum receiver for realistic coherent optical communications."Nature Photonics (2014) DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.280

Journal information: Nature Photonics

Citation: Low error-rate detector system for telecommunications (2014, December 3) retrieved 29 March 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2014-12-error-rate-detector-telecommunications.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Record high data accuracy rates for phase-modulated transmission

0 shares

Feedback to editors